Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Isolation Between Sympatric and Allopatric Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis*

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

According to reinforcement theory, sexual isolation between species in sympatry is strengthened by natural selection against maladaptive hybrids. Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis from four locations where these species are sympatric, and from three locations where only D. pseudoobscura has been found, were utilized in studies of sexual isolation. Multiple-choice observation chambers were used to record matings between sympatric and allopatric strains of the two species. There was a wide variation in sexual isolation between the two species in the four localities we studied. The average isolation index for sympatric strains of the species was not significantly different from the average index for allopatric strains. There were no meaningful differences between the isolation indices in sympatric and allopatric strains of the species. The failure to find a relationship is likely the result of gene flow among populations within the two species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W. W. Anderson J. Arnold D. B. Baldwin A. T. Beckenbach C. J. Brown S. H. Bryant J. D. Coyne L. G. Harshman W. B. Heed D. E. Jeffrey L. B. Klaczko B. C. Moore J. M. Porter J. R. Powell T. Prout S. W. Schaeffer J. C. Stephens C. E. Taylor M. E. Turner G. O. Williams J. A. Moore (1991) ArticleTitleFour decades of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 10367–10371

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Anderson F. J. Ayala R. E. Michod (1977) ArticleTitleChromosomal and allozymic diagnosis of three species of Drosophila: D. pseudoobscura, D. persimilis, and D. miranda J.␣Hered. 68 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Anderson C. J. Brown (1984) ArticleTitleA test for rare male mating advantage with Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes Genetics 107 577–699

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Anderson L. Ehrman (1969) ArticleTitleMating choice in crosses between geographic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura Am. Midl. Nat. 81 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H. L. (1971). The ecology of Drosophila breeding sites. Harold L. Lyon Arboretum Lecture No. 2, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii

  • P. Casares M. C. Carracedo B. Rio R. Pineiro L. Garcia-Florez A. R. Barros (1998) ArticleTitleDisentangling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila Evolution 52 126–133

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Coyne H. A. Orr (1997) ArticleTitle“Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited Evolution 51 295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Coyne H. A. Orr (2004) Speciation Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Coyne S. Y. Kim A. S. Chang D. Lachaise S. Elwyn (2002) ArticleTitleSexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping races: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba Evolution 56 2424–2434

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon Schully, S., and Noor, M. A. F. (2004). Evaluating the mode of reinforcement in Drosophila pseudoobscura: Discrimination enhancement vs. preference evolution. Dros. Inf. Serv. (in press)

  • Th. Dobzhansky (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky (1940) ArticleTitleSpeciation as a stage in genetic divergence Am. Nat. 74 312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky (1944) ArticleTitleChromosomal races in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Carnegie Institution of Washington Publ. 554 47–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky (1945) ArticleTitleGenetic structure of natural populations Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 44 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky (1974) ArticleTitleActive dispersal and passive transport in Drosophila Evolution 27 565–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky P. C. Koller (1938) ArticleTitleAn experimental study of sexual isolation in Drosophila Biologischen Zentralblatt 58 589–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky O. Pavlovsky (1971) ArticleTitleExperimentally created incipient species of Drosophila Nature 230 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky J. R. Powell (1975) Drosophila pseudoobscura and its American relatives R. C. King (Eds) Handbook of Genetics NumberInSeriesVol. 3. New York Plenum 537–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Dobzhansky S. Wright (1947) ArticleTitleGenetics of natural populations XV. Rate of diffusion of a mutant gene through a population of Drosophila pseudoobscura Genetics 32 303–324

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman (1965) ArticleTitleDirect observations of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of different Drosophila paulistorum races Evolution 19 459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman (1966) ArticleTitleMating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila Anim. Behav. 14 332–339

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman (1970) ArticleTitleThe mating advantage of rare males in Drosophila Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 65 345–348

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman (1971) ArticleTitleNatural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation Am. Nat. 105 479–483

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman (1983) ArticleTitleFourth report on natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation Am. Nat. 121 290–293

    Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Elens J. M. Wattiaux (1964) ArticleTitleDirect observation of sexual isolation Dros. Inf. Serv. 39 118–119

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hey R. Nielsen (2004) ArticleTitleMultilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence times, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Genetics 167 747–760

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Howard (1999) ArticleTitleConspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Hunter (1960) ArticleTitleDrosophilidae of Bogota, Colombia Dros. Inf. Serv. 34 86

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Jones S. H. Bryant R. C. Lewontin J. A. Moore T. Prout (1981) ArticleTitleGene flow and the geographical distribution of a molecular polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura Genetics 98 157–178

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Kaneshiro (1976) ArticleTitleEthological isolation and phylogeny in the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 30 740–745

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kessler (1966) ArticleTitleSelection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis Evolution 20 634–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. -K. Kim H. R. Koepfer L. Ehrman (1996) ArticleTitleDevelopmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III Alternative rearing. Behav. Genet. 26 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Knoppien (1985) ArticleTitleRare-male mating advantage: a review Biol. Rev. 60 81–117

    Google Scholar 

  • K. F. Koopman (1950) ArticleTitleNatural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis Evolution 4 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Machado R. M. Kliman J. A. Markert J. Hey (2002) ArticleTitleInferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives Mol. Biol. Evol., 19 472–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Ch. Malogolowkin-Cohen A. S. Simmons H. Levene (1965) ArticleTitleA study of sexual isolation between certain strains of Drosophila paulistorum Evolution 19 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Marshall M. L. Arnold D. J. Howard (2002) ArticleTitleReinforcement: The road not taken Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 558–563

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Muller (1942) ArticleTitleIsolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature Biol. Symposia 6 71–125

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Noor (1995) ArticleTitleSpeciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila Nature 375 674–675

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Noor (1999) ArticleTitleReinforcement and other consequences of sympatry Heredity 83 503–508

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Noor K. L. Grams A. Bertucci Y. Almendarez J. A. Reiland (2001) ArticleTitleThe genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males Evolution 55 512–521

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Ortiz-Barrientos B. A. Counterman M. A. F. Noor (2004) ArticleTitleThe genetics of speciation by reinforcement PLoS Biol. 2 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Schaeffer E. L. Miller (1991) ArticleTitleNucleotide sequence analysis of Adh genes estimates the time of geographic isolation of the Bogota population of Drosophila pseudoobscura Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 6097–6101

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Schaeffer E. L. Miller (1992) ArticleTitleEstimates of gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura determined from nucleotide sequence analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase region Genetics 132 471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Servedio M. A. Noor (2003) ArticleTitleThe role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34 339–364

    Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Siegel J. C. Hall D. A. Gailey C. P. Kyriacou (1984) ArticleTitleGenetic elements of courtship in Drosophila: mosaics and learning mutants Behav. Genet. 14 383–410

    Google Scholar 

  • E. B. Spiess (1970) Mating propensity and its genetic basis in drosophila M. K. Hecht W. C. Steere (Eds) Essays in evolution and genetics in honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky Appleton Century Crofts New York 315–379

    Google Scholar 

  • H. T. Spieth (1968) Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila Th. Dobzhansky M. K. Hecht W. C. Steere (Eds) Evolutionary biology NumberInSeriesVol. 2 Plenum New York 157–193

    Google Scholar 

  • H. T. Spieth J. Ringo (1983) Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila M. Ashburner H. L. Carson J. M. Thompson SuffixJr. (Eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila NumberInSeriesVol. 3c Academic Press New York 223–284

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Wang J. Hey (1996) ArticleTitleThe speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus Genetics 144 1113–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Wang J. Wakeley J. Hey (1997) ArticleTitleGene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives Genetics 147 1091–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wasserman H. R. Koepfer (1977) ArticleTitleCharacter displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis Evolution 43 362–381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-7223, USA

    Wyatt W. Anderson & Yong-Kyu Kim

Authors
  1. Wyatt W. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong-Kyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wyatt W. Anderson.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Prof. Lee Ehrman – excellent scientist, friend, and mentor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, W.W., Kim, YK. Sexual Isolation Between Sympatric and Allopatric Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis*. Behav Genet 35, 305–312 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3222-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3222-3

KEYWORDS

Search

Navigation