Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive analytical study on seismic performance of concrete structures equipped with self-centered hybrid wall system in moderate to high seismic hazard zones

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, comprehensive analytical and parametric studies were conducted on seismic performance of concrete structures equipped with self-centered unbonded post-tensioned hybrid wall system in comparison with traditional structural wall system. For this purpose, analytical models were developed and to further study the seismic performance of self centering hybrid wall, parametric analysis was performed considering four parameters: wall aspect ratio, initial stress of post-tensioned (PT) tendons, the total area of PT tendons, the total area of mild bars. The performance of buildings was evaluated under non-linear quasi cyclic and time history method considering two seismic hazard levels, the design-based earthquake (DBE) level and the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCE) level. Hysteresis response, damage severity and pattern index estimation, energy dissipation ability and damping ratio, relative self-centering efficiency (RSE), residual drift, peak roof drift and inter-story drift ratio, floors acceleration, shear force ratio, column curvature ductility, prestressing and gap opening effect of all buildings were studied. The results of the parametric analysis showed by increasing the prestressing ratio, wall damage severity, residual drift and energy dissipation capacity were decreased and structural seismic demand and RSE increased, while increasing mild bars was the most efficient method for improving the energy dissipation ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • ACI318-14 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318-14). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.

  • Ajrab JJ, Pekcan G, Mander JB (2004) Rocking wall–frame structures with supplemental tendon systems. J Struct Eng 130(6):895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE/SEI7 (2017) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers.

  • Belleri A, Schoettler MJ, Restrepo JI, Fleischman RB (2014) Dynamic behavior of rocking and hybrid cantilever walls in a precast concrete building. ACI Struct J. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddika HS, Wijeyewickrema AC (2016) Seismic performance evaluation of posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame buildings and comparison with shear wall-frame buildings. J Struct Eng 142(6):04016021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnady AM, Jiang H (2023) Seismic performance of an earthquake resilient self-centering precast reinforced concrete rocking wall with external SMA rods. J Earthq Eng 28:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkmen B, Schultz AE (2009) Self-centering behavior of unbonded, post-tensioned precast concrete shear walls. J Earthquake Eng 13(7):1047–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA, P 695 (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695). Washington, DC.

  • Foyouzati A (2023) Analytical study on seismic strengthening of reinforced concrete frame equipped with steel damping system with shear mechanism fuse. Asian J Civil Eng 25(1):1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00820-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foyouzati A, Rahimzadeh Rofooei F (2023) Seismic hazard assessment studies based on developed deterministic and probabilistic approaches for the central-east of Iran region. World J Eng. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-04-2023-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu A, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Li Q, Qu G (2019) Experimental study and parameter analysis on the seismic performance of self-centering hybrid reinforced concrete shear walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 116:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan D, Peng Z, Lin Y, Liu J, Zhang L (2023) Development and seismic performance of precast rocking walls with multiple steel energy dissipaters. Case Stud Constr Mater 19:e02304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid N, Mander JB (2010) Lateral seismic performance of multipanel precast hollowcore walls. J Struct Eng 136(7):795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid N, Mander JB (2012) A comparative seismic performance between precast hollow core walls and conventional walls using incremental dynamic analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 37(7):1801–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid N, Mander JB (2014) Damage avoidance design for buildings. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(2):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry RS, Aaleti S, Sritharan S, Ingham JM (2010) Concept and finite-element modeling of new steel shear connectors for self-centering wall systems. J Eng Mech 136(2):220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry RS, Sritharan S, Ingham JM (2016) Residual drift analyses of realistic self-centering concrete wall systems. Earthq Struct 10(2):409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden T, Restrepo J, Mander JB (2003) Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. J Struct Eng 129(3):286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITG-5.1-07 A (2007) Acceptance criteria for special unbonded posttensioned precast structural walls based on validation testing. ACI ITG-5.1–07, American Concrete Institute.

  • ITG-5.2 A (2009) Requirements for design of a special unbonded post-tensioned precast shear wall satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 and commentary. ACI ITG-5.2.

  • Jafari A, Akbarzadeh Bengar H, Hassanli R, Nazari M, Dugnani R (2021) The response of self-centering concrete walls under quasi-static loading. Bull Earthq Eng 19:2893–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaloo A, Doost RB (2018) Seismic performance of precast RC column to steel beam connections with variable joint configurations. Eng Struct 160:408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaloo A, Maghsoudi-Barmi A, Moeini ME (2020) Numerical parametric investigation of hysteretic behavior of steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings under large shear deformation. Structures 26:456–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T-H, Lee K-M, Chung Y-S, Shin H (2005) Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Eng Struct 27(4):576–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC (2000) Unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with supplemental viscous damping. ACI Struct J 97(4):648–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurama Y, Pessiki S, Sause R, Lu L-W (1999a) Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. PCI J 44(3):72–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurama Y, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu L-W (1999b) Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. Structural Journal 96(4):622–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu L-W (2002) Seismic response evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned precast walls. Structural Journal 99(5):641–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Dang X, Qian J, Zhou Y, Jiang H (2017) Experimental study of self-centering shear walls with horizontal bottom slits. J Struct Eng 143(3):04016183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoudi-Barmi A, Khansefid A, Khaloo A, Moeini ME (2021) Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of optimally designed highway bridge isolated by ordinary unbonded elastomeric bearings. Eng Struct 247:113058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Cheng CT (1997) Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design. In: Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design. pp 109–109

  • McKenna F (2011) OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng 13(4):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagae T, Tahara K, Fukuyama K, Matsumori T, Shiohara H, Kabeyasawa T, Kono S, Nishiyama M, Moehle J, Wallace J (2012) Test results of four-story reinforced concrete and post-tensioned concrete buildings: The 2010 E-Defense shaking table test. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering.

  • Nazari M, Sritharan S, Aaleti S (2017) Single precast concrete rocking walls as earthquake force-resisting elements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 46(5):753–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T, Priestley MN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings (Vol 768). Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perez F, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu L-W (2002) Lateral load behavior of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. In: Advances in Building Technology. Elsevier, New York. pp 423-430

  • Preti M, Giuriani E (2007) Preliminary results on a full scale experiment on seismic rocking structural walls. Third central European congress on concrete engineering.

  • Preti M, Marini A, Metelli G, Giuriani E (2009) Full scale experimental investigation on a prestressed rocking structural wall with unbonded steel dowels as shear keys. In: 13th Conference ANIDIS on Earthquake engineering.

  • Preti M, Meda A (2015) RC structural wall with unbonded tendons strengthened with high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Mater Struct 48(1):249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MN, Sritharan S, Conley JR, Pampanin S (1999) Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J 44(6):42–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley M, Calvi G, Kowalsky M (2007) Direct displacement-based seismic design of structures. In: NZSEE conference, pp 1–23.

  • Rahman AM, Restrepo-Posada JI (2000) Earthquake resistant precast concrete buildings: seismic performance of cantilever walls prestressed using unbonded tendons.

  • Rahman MA, Sritharan S (2006) An evaluation of force-based design versus direct displacement-based design of jointed precast post-tensioned wall systems. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 5(2):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MA, Sritharan S (2007) Performance-based seismic evaluation of two five-story precast concrete hybrid frame buildings. J Struct Eng 133(11):1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MA, Sritharan S (2015) Seismic response of precast, posttensioned concrete jointed wall systems designed for low-to midrise buildings using the direct displacement-based approach. PCI J 60(2):38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo JI, Rahman A (2007) Seismic performance of self-centering structural walls incorporating energy dissipators. J Struct Eng 133(11):1560–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers GW, Solberg KM, Chase JG, Mander JB, Bradley BA, Dhakal RP, Li L (2008) Performance of a damage-protected beam–column subassembly utilizing external HF2V energy dissipation devices. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37(13):1549–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers GW, Mander JB, Chase G, Dhakal R (2016) Beyond ductility: parametric testing of a jointed rocking beam-column connection designed for damage avoidance. J Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideris P, Aref AJ, Filiatrault A (2014) Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints. J Bridg Eng 19(10):04014036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BJ, Kurama YC, McGinnis MJ (2011) Design and measured behavior of a hybrid precast concrete wall specimen for seismic regions. J Struct Eng 137(10):1052–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BJ, Kurama YC, McGinnis MJ (2013) Behavior of precast concrete shear walls for seismic regions: comparison of hybrid and emulative specimens. J Struct Eng 139(11):1917–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Yang T, Zhou Y (2021) Performance evaluation of self-centering rocking shear walls: Part 1—quantification of structural damages. Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toranzo L, Restrepo J, Mander J, Carr A (2009) Shake-table tests of confined-masonry rocking walls with supplementary hysteretic damping. J Earthquake Eng 13(6):882–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigden K, Sritharan S, Henry R (2017) Cyclic testing of unbonded post-tensioned concrete wall systems with and without supplemental damping. Eng Struct 140:406–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Foyouzati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foyouzati, A., Khaloo, A. Comprehensive analytical study on seismic performance of concrete structures equipped with self-centered hybrid wall system in moderate to high seismic hazard zones. Bull Earthquake Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01913-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01913-0

Keywords

Navigation