Abstract
In low to moderate seismic regions such as the Korean peninsula, it is difficult to perform seismic hazard analyses to construct hazard maps and curves because only a limited number of strong ground motion records is available. In this study, to solve such obstacles, ground motions are simulated using a stochastic model for Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) in frequency domain and shaping window model in time domain. The generalized inversion technique is adopted to determine the seismological characteristics (source, path, and site effects) of the FAS for Korean region. The validity of the source, path, and site effects obtained from the GIT and that of simulated ground motions is verified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data can be downloaded from NECIS website operated by the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) after registration.
References
Ameri G, Oth A, Pilz M, Bindi D, Parolai S, Luzi L, Mucciarelli M, Cultrera G (2011) Separation of source and site effects by generalized inversion technique using the aftershock recordings of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. B Earthq Eng 9:717–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9248-4
Andrews DJ (1986) Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size. Geophys Monogr Ser 37:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM037p0259
Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 438–483
Atkinson G, Assatourians K, Cheadle B, Greig W (2015) Ground motions from three recent earthquakes in Western Alberta and Northeastern British Columbia and their implications for induced-seismicity hazard in eastern regions. Seismol Res Lett 86(3):1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140195
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground-motion relations for eastern North America. B Seismol Soc Am 85(1):17–30. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0850010017
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. B Seismol Soc Am 96(6):2181–2205. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050245
Atkinson GM, Cassidy JF (2000) Integrated use of seismograph and strong-motion data to determine soil amplification: response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait earthquakes. B Seismol Soc Am 90(4):1028–1040. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990098
Bindi D, Kotha SR (2020) Spectral decomposition of the Engineering Strong Motion (ESM) flat file: regional attenuation, source scaling and Arias stress drop. B Earthq Eng 18:2581–2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00796-1
Boatwright J, Fletcher J, Fumal TE (1991) A general inversion scheme for source, site, and propagation characteristics using multiply recorded sets of moderate-sized earthquakes. B Seismol Soc Am 81(5):1754–1782. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0810051754
Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high–frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. B Seismol Soc Am 73(6A):1865–1894. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA07306A1865
Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3–4):635–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553
Boore DM, Boatwright J (1984) Average body-wave radiation coefficients. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5):1615–21. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0740051615
Borcherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. B Seismol Soc Am 60(1):29–61. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0600010029
Braganza S, Atkinson GM, Ghofrani H, Hassani B, Chouinard L, Rosset P, Motazedian D, Hunter J (2016) Modeling site amplification in eastern Canada on a regional scale. Seismol Res Lett 87(4):1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160009
Brune J (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves. J Geophys Res-Atmos 75:4997–5009. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075I026P04997
Brune J (1971) Correction: tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves. J Geophys Res-Atmos 76:5002. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB076i020p05002
Calais E, Camelbeeck T, Stein S, Liu M, Craig TJ (2016) A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors. Geophys Res Lett 43(20):10621–10637. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070815
Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground–motion(attenuation) relations in Eastern North America. B Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020002
Castro RR, Anderson JG, Singh SK (1990) Site response, attenuation and source spectra of S waves along the Guerrero, Mexico, subduction zone. B Seismol Soc Am 80(6A):1481–1503. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA08006A1481
Castro RR, Mucciarelli M, Pacor F, Petrungaro C (1997) S-wave site-response estimates using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios. B Seismol Soc Am 87(1):256–260. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870010256
Chiu H (1997) Stable baseline correction of digital strong–motion data. B Seismol Soc Am 87(4):932–944. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870040932
Dutta U, Martirosyan A, Biswas N, Papageeorgiou A, Combellick R (2001) Estimation of S-wave site response in anchorage, Alaska, from weak-motion data using generalized inversion method. B Seismol Soc Am 91(2):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000119
Edwards B, Rietbrock A, Bommer JJ, Baptie B (2008) The acquisition of source, path, and site effects from microearthquake recordings using Q tomography: application to the United Kingdom. B Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1915–1935. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070127
El-Hussain I, Deif A, Al-Jabri K, Mohamed AME, Al-Rawas G, Toksöz MN, Sundararajan N, El-Hady S, Al-Hashmi S, Al-Toubi K, Al-Saifi M, Al-Habsi Z (2013) Seismic microzonation for Muscat region, Sultanate of Oman. Nat Hazards 69:1919–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0785-9
Ellsworth WL, Giardini D, Townend J, Ge S, Shimamoto T (2019) Triggering of the Pohang, Korea, earthquake (Mw 5.5) by enhanced geothermal system stimulation. Seismol Res Lett 90(5):1844–1858. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190102
Field EH, Jacob KH (1995) A comparison and test of various site–response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference–site dependent. B Seismol Soc Am 85(4):1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0850041127
Frankel A (1994) Implication pf felt area-magnitude relations for earthquake scaling and the average frequency of perceptible ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84(2):462–465
Grendas I, Theodoulidis N, Hatzidimitriou P, Margaris B, Drouet S (2018) Determination of source, path and site parameters based on non-linear inversion of accelerometric data in Greece. B Earthq Eng 16:5061–5094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0379-8
Ha SJ, Han SW (2016) A method for selecting ground motions that considers target response spectrum mean and variance as well as correlation structure. J Earthq Eng 20(8):1263–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1138162
Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid. Earth 84(B5):2348–2350. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348
Hanks TC, McGuire R (1981) The character of high-frequency strong ground motion. B Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2071–2095. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0710062071
Hartzell S, Leeds A, Frankel A, Michael J (1996) Site response for urban Los Angeles using aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake. B Seismol Soc Am 86(1B):S168–S192. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA08601BS168
Jee HW, Han SW (2022) Regional ground motion prediction equation developed for the Korean Peninsula using recorded and simulated ground motions. J Earthq Eng 26(10):5384–5406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1871682
Ji K, Ren Y, Wen R (2017) Site classification for National Strong Motion Observation Network System (NSMONS) stations in China using an empirical H/V spectral ratio method. J Asian Earth Sci 147(1):79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.07.032
Johnston AC (1996) (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—I. Instrumental seismicity. Geophys J Int 124:381–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb07028.x
Joshi A, Tomer M, Lal S, Chopra S, Singh S, Prajapati S, Sharma ML, Sandeep (2016) Estimation of the source parameters of the Nepal Earthquake from strong motion data. Nat Hazards 83:867–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2351-8
Kalkan E (2016) An automatic P-phase arrival–time picker. B Seismol Soc Am 106(3):971–986. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150111
Kim K, Seo W, Han J, Kwon J, Kang SY, Ree J, Kim S, Liu K (2020) The 2017 ML 5.4 Pohang earthquake sequence, Korea, recorded by a dense seismic network. Tectonophysics 774(5):228306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228306
Klin P, Laurenzano G, Priolo E (2018) GITANES: a MATLAB package for estimation of site spectral amplification with the generalized inversion technique. Seismol Res Lett 89(1):182–190. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170080
Laouami N, Slimani A, Larbes S (2018) Ground motion prediction equations for Algeria and surrounding region using site classification based H/V spectral ratio. B Earthq Eng 16:2653–2684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0310-3
Laurenzano G, Barnaba C, Romano MA, Priolo E, Bertoni M, Bragato PL, Comelli P, Dreossi I, Garbin M (2019) The Central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence: site response analysis based on seismological data in the Arquata del Tronto-Montegallo municipalities. B Earthq Eng 17:5449–5469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0355-3
Lee J, Ryoo Y, Park SC, Han YM, Park JS, Kim MS, Park SM, Cho HG, Lee KS, Kim IS, Kim HS, Bae S (2018) Seismicity of the 2016 ML 58 Gyeongju earthquake and aftershocks in South Korea. Geosci J 22(3):433–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0071-z
Lee K, Yang WS (2006) Historical seismicity of Korea. B Seismol Soc Am 96(3):846–855. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050050
Moon KH, Han SW, Lee TS, Seok SW (2012) Approximate MPA-based method for performing incremental dynamic analysis. Nonlin Dyn 67(4):2865–2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0195-z
Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep Railw Tech Res Inst 30(1):25–33
NEMA (2012) Active fault map and seismic harzard map. National Emergency Management Agency. Korea, pp 939 (in Korean)
Oth A, Bindi D, Parolai S, Giacomo DD (2011) Spectral analysis of K-NET and KiK–net data in Japan, part II: on attenuation characteristics, source spectra, and site response of borehole and surface stations. B Seismol Soc Am 101(2):667–687. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100135
Pacor F, Spallarossa D, Oth A, Luzi L, Puglia R, Cantore L, Mercuri A, D’Amico M, Bindi D (2016) Spectral models for ground motion prediction in the L’Aquila region(central Italy): evidence for stress–drop dependence on magnitude and depth. Geophys J Int 204(2):697–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv448
Parolai S, Bindi D, Augliera P (2000) Application of the generalized inversion technique (GIT) to a microzonation study: numerical simulations and comparison with different site-estimation techniques. B Seismol Soc Am 90(2):286–297. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990041
Parolai S, Picozzi M, Richwalski SM, Milkereit C (2005) Joint inversion of phase velocity dispersion and H/V ratio curves from seismic noise recordings using a genetic algorithm, considering higher modes. Geophys Res Lett 32(1):L01303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021115
Pezeshk S, Zandieh A, Tavakoli B (2011) Hybrid empirical ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America using NGA models and updated seismological parameters. B Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1859–1870. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100144
Priolo E, Pacor F, Spallarossa D, Milana G, Laurenzano G, Romano MA, Felicetta C, Hailemikael S, Cara F, Di Giulio G, Ferretti G, Barnaba C, Lanzano G, Luzi L, D’Amico M, Puglia R, Scafidi D, Barani S, De Ferrari R, Cultrera G (2020) Seismological analyses of the seismic microzonation of 138 municipalities damaged by the 2016–2017 seismic sequence in Central Italy. B Earthq Eng 18:5553–5593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00652-x
Ren Y, Wen R, Yamanaka H, Kashima T (2013) Site effects by generalized inversion using strong motion recordings of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 12:165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0160-6
Salazar W, Sardina V, Cortina J (2007) A Hybrid inversion technique for the evaluation of source, path, and site effects employing S-wave spectra for subduction and upper-crustal earthquakes in El salvador. B Seismol Soc Am 97(1B):208–221. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060076
Sánchez-Sesma FJ (2017) Modeling and inversion of the microtremor H/V spectral ratio: physical basis behind the diffuse field approach. Earth Planets Space 69:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0667-6
Schulte SM, Mooney WD (2005) An updated global earthquake catalogue for stable continental regions: reassessing the correlation with ancient rifts. Geophys J Int 161(3):707–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02554.x
Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1996) What is a reference site? B Seismol Soc Am 86(6):1733–1748. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0860061733
Sung C, Abrahamson NA, Kuehn NM, Traversa P, Zentner I (2022) A non-ergodic ground-motion model of Fourier amplitude spectra for France. B Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01403-1
Tanırcan G, Yelkenci-Necmioğlu S (2020) Simulation of the strong ground motion for the 20 July 2017 (Mw. 6.6) Bodrum-Kos earthquake. B Earthq Eng 18:5807–5825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00892-2
Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.41
Tsuda K, Kokesu K, Hisada Y, Hayakawa T (2010) Inversion analysis of site responses in the Kanto basin using data from a dense strong motion seismograph array. B Seismol Soc Am 100(3):1276–1287. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090153
Tucker B, King J (1984) Dependence of sediment-filled valley response on input amplitude and valley properties. B Seismol Soc Am 74:153–165. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0740010153
Wen YK, Collins KR, Han SW, Elwood KJ (1996) Dual-level designs of buildings under seismic loads. Struct Saf 18(2–3 SPEC. ISS.):195–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(96)00011-2
Woo J, Rhie J, Kim S, Kang T, Kim K, Kim Y (2019) The 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence revisited: aftershock interactions within a complex fault system. Geophys J Int 217(1):58–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz009
Yenier E, Atkinson GM (2015) An equivalent point-source model for stochastic simulation of earthquake ground motions in California. B Seismol Soc Am 105(3):1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140254
Zandieh A, Pezeshk S (2010) Investigation of geometrical spreading and quality factor functions in the New Madrid seismic zone. B Seismol Soc Am 100:2185–2195. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090209
Zhao JX, Irikura K, Zhang J, Yoshimitsu F, Somerville PG, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H (2006) An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio. B Seismol Soc Am 96(3):914–925. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050124
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by a Grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C2010548). The valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers were greatly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B: Extrapolation of the GMS to simulate strong ground motions
The GMS model proposed in this study could be used to simulate strong ground motions, which could be used to conduct seismic hazard analyses and to construct the seismic map. It is important to acquire strong ground motion data for low-to-moderate seismicity regions such as the Korean Peninsula.
For this purpose, ground motions should be simulated for any given event with a specific magnitude and \({R}_{H}\). In previous sections, the source effect is determined using the GIT only for earthquake events collected in the database.
Equation B1 can be used to determine the source effect, which was proposed by Brune (1970, 1971), which was used in previous studies (Atkinson and Boore 1995, 2006; Toro et al. 1997; Boore 1983, 2003 Campbell 2003; Pezeshk et al. 2011; Atkinson et al. 2015; Yenier and Atkinson 2015).
where \({M}_{o}\), \({f}_{c}\), and \({\kappa }_{Source}\) are the seismic moment in dyne-cm, corner frequency in Hz (Boore 1983), and source attenuation parameter for a given earthquake, respectively. The \({M}_{o}\) value can be calculated using equations proposed by Hanks and Kanamori (1979) by which source effect for a given earthquake magnitude can be estimated. The \({f}_{c}\) value can be calculated using an equation developed by Brune (1970, 1971), whereas the \({\kappa }_{Source}\) value can be found in Jee and Han (2022). In Eq. 13, \({R}_{\theta \varnothing }\left(=0.55\right)\) is the S-wave averaged radiation pattern coefficient (Boore and Boatwright 1984), \(F\left(=2\right)\) is the free surface effect, \(V\left(=1/\sqrt{2}\right)\) is the partition value of a vector into two horizontal components (Boore 1983), \({\rho }_{s}\) is the near source S-wave soil density in \({\text{g}}/{{\text{cm}}}^{3}\), \({\beta }_{s}\) is the near source S-wave shear wave velocity in \({\text{km}}/{\text{s}}\), and \(p\) (\(=\) 0, 1, and 2 for displacement, velocity, and acceleration) is the type of ground motion coefficient (Boore 1983). In Eq. 13, \({R}_{\theta \varnothing }\), \(F\), and \(V\) are parameters that use the same fixed values regardless of locations.
In addition to reproducing the ground motions recorded in the past in stable continental region (SCR) such as the Korean Peninsula, it is necessary to use methods that can extrapolate the magnitude of earthquakes in order to generate strong ground motions that may occur in future. According to previous studies (Hanks and Kanamori 1979; Boore 1983; Frankel 1994; Jee and Han 2022), it has been reported that the parameters \({M}_{o}\), \({f}_{c}\), and \({\kappa }_{Source}\) of the source effect can be determined for large moment magnitude (\({M}_{W}\)) in the stable continental region using Eq. B2, where \({M}_{o}\) can be calculated using Eq. B2 proposed by Hanks and Kanamori (1979).
However, there is no simple way to calculate \({f}_{c}\) only with \({M}_{W}\). This problem can be circumvented by using the stress drop (∆σ) before and after an earthquake event. Equation B3 is an equation proposed by Boore (1983) to calculate \({f}_{c}\) using \(\Delta \sigma \) and \({M}_{o}\) (Frankel 1994; Jee and Han 2022).
Figure 16a shows the stress drop (∆σ) values for each earthquake event derived by Eq. B3 according to \({M}_{W}\). As shown in Fig. 16a, ∆σ is proportional to the increase in \({M}_{W}\), but above a certain \({M}_{W}\) value, ∆σ is a relatively stable.
Frankel (1994) reported that stable continental regions (SCRs) such as the Korean Peninsula have stable ∆σ for \({M}_{W}\) of 4.0 or higher, and Jee and Han (2022) also reported that stable ∆σ was obtained for \({M}_{W}\) of 3.63 or higher in the Korean peninsula. Considering this aspect, in a stable continental region such as the Korean Peninsula, \({f}_{c}\) can be calculated using Eq. B3 with a fixed value of ∆σ for \({M}_{W}\) of 4.0 or higher. Figure 16b shows the values of source attenuation parameter (\({\kappa }_{Source}\)) estimated using Eq. B1 for earthquake events collected in this study according to \({M}_{W}\). Similarly with ∆σ, \({\kappa }_{Source}\) increases in proportion to \({M}_{W}\), but it has almost constant value irrespective of \({M}_{W}\) when \({M}_{W}\) exceeds a certain value (= 3.63). Thus, based on such observations, ∆σ of 69.27 and \({\kappa }_{Source}\) of 0.0099 are used when \({M}_{W}\) = 4.0 or higher. Ground motions induced by earthquakes with \({M}_{W} =\) 4.0 or higher can be generated using the proposed ground motion simulation model with calculated \({M}_{o}\), \({f}_{c}\), and \({\kappa }_{Source}\). This indicates that the GIT-based ground motion simulation model proposed in this study can generate strong ground motions from future earthquakes with \({M}_{W}\ge 4.0\), which can be used when conducting seismic hazard analyses and developing ground motion prediction equation.
As an example, ground motions were generated at the YOW2 station for earthquakes of \({M}_{W}\)= 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 occurred at a latitude of 37.18, longitude of 128.71, and depth of 6 km. The epicentral distance was 23.21 km. Figure 17 shows the FAS and acceleration time histories of the ground motions.
To simulate the strong ground motions for conducting seismic hazard analyses, the site effect should be determined at any locations in the Korean peninsula. There are ergodic amplification models, developed in different regions in the world. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is no equation to determine the site effect for the Korean peninsula. The procedure calculating site effect proposed by this study makes it possible to determine site effect at any location of Korea. Without the proposed procedure, ground motions should be simulated only at the same locations of seismic stations in Korea. Otherwise, some assumptions should be made that all locations are the same site condition as the reference stations.
Once the source effect is determined, strong ground motions can be simulated according to the procedure in Sect. 7.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jee, H.W., Han, S.W. Simulation of ground motions in the Korean peninsula using a stochastic model with generalized inversion technique. Bull Earthquake Eng 22, 2329–2351 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01869-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01869-1