Abstract
The method employed in this study combines large-scale shaking table tests with fully coupled 3D non-linear dynamic analysis to investigate the site response and structural damage mechanisms of laterally spreading site cluster pile foundation systems under weak and strong seismic excitation. The study also aims to verify the applicability of the high-efficiency and universal parallel calculation system method, which involves SolidWorks, HyperMesh, OpenSeesMP, and GiD, with a fully visualized interface operation in geotechnical engineering, based on the test database. The results show that under weak seismic excitation, the acceleration and displacement in the free field and near-pile region are linearly distributed along the burial depth, and the motion of shallow pile foundation is mainly controlled by the inertial effect of the superstructure; while under strong seismic excitation, the displacement in the near-field region is much smaller than the free field showing significant pile pinning effect, and the displacement and acceleration in the near-pile domain are cosine-shaped distributed along the burial depth, with the lateral spreading of site liquefaction intensifying. At the intersection of clay and sand layers, a weak interlayer is present, which affects the structural response. The kinematic effect of the site dominates the response, and the location of vulnerability gradually shifts from the pile bottom to the pile head.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang D, Boulanger R, Brandenberg S, Kutterb B (2013) FEM analysis of dynamic soil-pile-structure interaction in liquefied and laterally spreading ground. Earthq Spectra 29:733–755. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000156
Chen X-W, Han X-L (2010) Research summary on long-span connected tall building structure with viscous dampers. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 19:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.582
Cubrinovski M, Winkley A, Haskell J et al (2014) Spreading-induced damage to short-span bridges in Christchurch, New Zealand. Earthq Spectra 30:57–83. https://doi.org/10.1193/030513EQS063M
Dou P, Xu C, Du X, Chen S (2021) Influence of structure on the aseismic stability and dynamic responses of liquefiable soil. Bull Earthq Eng 20:55–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01213-x
Ebeido A, Elgamal A, Tokimatsu K, Abe A (2019) Pile and pile-group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in four large-scale shake-table experiments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002142
Elbadawy MA, Zhou Y-G, Liu K (2022) A modified pressure dependent multi-yield surface model for simulation of LEAP-Asia-2019 centrifuge experiments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 154:107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107135
Elgamal A, Yang Z, Parra E (2002) Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2
Elgamal A, Lu J, Forcellini D (2009) Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: three-dimensional numerical simulation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1672–1682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000137
Filippou FC, Popov EP, Bertero VV (1983) Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints. California Univ, Berkeley
Funahara H, Fujii S, Tamura S (2002) Numerical simulation of pile failure in liquefaction soil observed in large-scale shaking table test. In: 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE 2000). pp 0028–1421
Gavali P, Shah MS, Kadam G, Meher K (2013) Seismic response and simulations of reinforced concrete bridge using OpenSees on high performance computing. CSIT 1:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-013-0019-z
Green R, Olson S, Cox B et al (2011) Geotechnical Aspects of Failures at Port-au-Prince Seaport during the 12 January 2010 Haiti Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 27:S43–S65. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3636440
Hussein AF, El Naggar MH (2022a) Effect of model scale on helical piles response established from shake table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 152:107013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107013
Hussein AF, El Naggar MH (2022b) Seismic behaviour of piles in non-liquefiable and liquefiable soil. Bull Earthquake Eng 20:77–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01244-4
Jia-jia X, Xiao-jian W (2016) Optimization analysis of h-type anti-sliding pile reinforcing slope. Water Resour Pow 34:113–115+106
Kato K, Gonzalez D, Ledezma C, Ashford S (2014) Analysis of pile foundations affected by liquefaction and lateral spreading with pinning effect during the 2010 Maule Chile earthquake. In: NCEE 2014 - 10th US national conference on earthquake engineering: frontiers of earthquake engineering. https://doi.org/10.4231/D3KS6J54D
Kent DC, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div 97:1969–1990. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957
Kuhlmeyer RL, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Division 99:421–427. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001885
Kulasingam R, Malvick EJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL (2004) Strength loss and localization at silt interlayers in slopes of liquefied sand. J Geotec Geoenviron Eng 130:1192–1202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:11(1192)
Mahalakshmi M, Arulsurya M (2021) Effect of lateral load on response of pile foundation. In: Kumaresan G, Shanmugam NS, Dhinakaran V (eds) Advances in materials research. Springer, Singapore, pp 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8319-3_25
Malvick EJ, Kutter BL, Boulanger RW (2008) Postshaking shear strain localization in a centrifuge model of a saturated sand slope. J Geotec Geoenviron Eng 134:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(164)
Mazzoni S, Mckenna F, Fenves G et al (2009) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley
McCullough NJ (2004) The seismic geotechnical modeling, performance, and analysis of pile -supported wharves. Oregon State University, Ph.D.
Motamed R, Sesov V, Towhata I, Anh NT (2010) Experimental modeling of large pile groups in sloping ground subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral flow: 1-G shaking table tests. Soils Found 50:261–279. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.261
Papanikolaou VK, Kartalis-Kaounis T, Protopapadakis VK, Papadopoulos T (2017) GiD+OpenSees Interface: a major extension to nonlinear finite element analysis
Petracca M, Candeloro F, Camata G (2017) STKO user manual. ASDEA Software Technology, Pescara Italy
Scott BD, Park R, Priestley MJN (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. JP 79:13–27. https://doi.org/10.14359/10875
Stockwell RG (2007) A basis for efficient representation of the S-transform. Digital Signal Process 17:371–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2006.04.006
Su L, Tang L, Ling X et al (2016) Pile response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: a shake-table investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 82:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.013
Su L, Wan H-P, Abtahi S et al (2020) Dynamic response of soil–pile–structure system subjected to lateral spreading: Shaking table test and parallel finite element simulation. Can Geotech J 57:497–517. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0485
Takahashi H, Takahashi N, Morikawa Y et al (2016) Efficacy of pile-type improvement against lateral flow of liquefied ground. Géotechnique 66:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.14.P.238
Thevanayagam S, Kanagalingam T, Reinhorn A et al (2009) Laminar box system for 1-g physical modeling of liquefaction and lateral spreading. Geotech Test J 32:438–449. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102154
Tokimatsu K, Suzuki H, Sato M (2005) Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:753–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.018
Wang N (2015) Three-dimensional modeling of ground-pile systems and bridge foundations. Ph. D. University of California, San Diego
Wang R, Fu P, Zhang J-M (2016) Finite element model for piles in liquefiable ground. Comput Geotec 72:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.10.009
Wang X, Luo F, Su Z, Ye A (2017) Efficient finite-element model for seismic response estimation of piles and soils in liquefied and laterally spreading ground considering shear localization. Int J Geomech 17:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000835
Xu C, Dou P, Du X et al (2020) Seismic performance of pile group-structure system in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soil from large-scale shake table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 138:106299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106299
Yang Z, Elgamal A (2002) Influence of permeability on liquefaction-induced shear deformation. J Eng Mech 128:720–729. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399
Zalachoris G, Zekkos D, Athanasopoulos-Zekkos A, Gerolymos N (2021) The role of liquefaction on the seismic response of quay walls during the 2014 cephalonia, greece, earthquakes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147:04021137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002662
Zerwer A, Cascante G, Hutchinson J (2002) Parameter estimation in finite element simulations of rayleigh waves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:250–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:3(250)
Zhang Z, Li Y, Xu C et al (2021) Study on seismic failure mechanism of shallow buried underground frame structures based on dynamic centrifuge tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 150:106938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106938
Zienkiewicz OC, Chang CT, Bettess P (1980) Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behaviour assumptions in soils. Géotechnique 30:385–395. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.385
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52225807). Special thanks to the peer reviewers who provided valuable suggestions to improve this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52225807).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
The equations for different depths in frictional contact are described below.
where, \({F}_{max}^{h}\) is the ultimate frictional resistance; \({G}_{h}\) is the initial shear modulus of the soil; \({K}_{0}\) is the static earth pressure coefficient of the soil; \({\varphi }_{h}\), \({c}_{h}\), \({\sigma }_{v}^{,}\), are the effective internal friction angle, undrained shear cohesion, and initial vertical effective stress of the soil, respectively; N is the number of pile foundations; \({A}_{h}\) is the force area assigned to a single zero-length unit; D is the diameter of the pile foundation; \({l}_{h}\) is the force length of the pile node; \({d}_{D}^{h}, {d}_{l}^{h}\) are the critical pile-soil relative displacements along the pile diameter and pile axis, respectively;\({E}_{D}^{h}, {E}_{l}^{h}\) are the frictional contact stiffness along the pile diameter and pile axis.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, R., Xu, C., Jia, K. et al. Large-scale shaking table test and three-dimensional numerical simulation research on earthquake seismic failure response of laterally spreading site-pile group-superstructure system. Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 4789–4819 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01713-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01713-y