Skip to main content
Log in

Design approach of shear strengthened masonry: welded wire meshes, Reticulatus and cementitious plastering methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Masonry often requires strengthening to withstand against extreme actions such as earthquakes, cyclones and flooding. Recently, new methods have been developed to strengthen masonry, such as fabric reinforced cementitious matrixes and fibre reinforced polymers. However, other strengthening systems such as welded wire meshing (WWM), reticulatus and plastering with cementitious matrixes/mortar (CP) have been also practiced to reinforce masonry, conversely no systematic design guidelines are available for these methods. In this study, an attempt has been made to establish rational design approaches to predict the shear resistance of WWM, reticulatus and CP methods. Three sets of experimental database have been developed for design verification. The effectiveness of these strengthening methods was appraised by comparing their structural performances. The available formulations to predict the shear resistance of unreinforced masonry (URM) and CP strengthened masonry were assessed against the established database, and suitable modifications were proposed to effectively account the contribution of cementitious matrix. A unified approach to estimate the shear strength was proposed based on the contribution of URM, CP and reinforcements. The design approach is shown to conservatively predict the shear strength of strengthened masonry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI (2017) ACI committee 440 (2017) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures (440.2R-17)

  • ACI Committee 549 (2013) Guide to design and construction of externally bonded fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems for repair and strengthening concrete and masonry structures (ACI 549.4R-13). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  • Almeida JAPP, Pereira EB, Barros JAO (2015) Assessment of overlay masonry strengthening system under in-plane monotonic and cyclic loading using the diagonal tensile test. Constr Build Mater 94:851–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araya-Letelier G, Calderón S, Sandoval C, Sanhueza M, Murcia-Delso J (2019) Fragility functions for partially-grouted masonry shear walls with bed-joint reinforcement. Eng Struct 191:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AS 3700 (2018) Design of masonry structures. Australian Standards, Sydney

  • ASTM E519/E519M-21 (2021) Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear) in masonry assemblages. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021,

  • Augenti N, Parisi F (2011) Constitutive modelling of tuff masonry in direct shear. Constr Build Mater 25(4):1612–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augenti N, Parisi F, Prota A, Manfredi G (2010) In-plane lateral response of a fullscale masonry subassemblage with and without an inorganic matrix-grid strengthening system. J Compos Constr 15(4):578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2020a) Improving the in-plane behavior of brick masonry wallet using PP band and steel wire mesh. J Mater Civ Eng 32(6):04020132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Nayak S, Das S (2020b) Shear and flexural behaviour of unreinforced masonry wallets with steel wire mesh. J Build Eng 30:101254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M (2011a) Shear behavior of masonry panels strengthened by high strength steel cords. Constr Build Mater 25(2):494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M, Speranzini E (2011b) Shear behavior of unreinforced and reinforced masonry panels subjected to in situ diagonal compression tests. Constr Build Mater 25:4403–4414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M, Sisti R (2014) Masonry wall panels with GFRP and steel-cord strengthening subjected to cyclic shear: an experimental study. Constr Build Mater 56:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brignola A, Frumento S, Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2008) Identification of shear parameters of masonry panels through the in-situ diagonal compression test. Int J Archit Herit 3(1):52–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS EN 1996-1-1 (2005) Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures—Part 1–1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. British Standards Institution, London

  • Bustos-García A, Moreno-Fernández E, Zavalis R, Valivonis J (2019) Diagonal compression tests on masonry wallets coated with mortars reinforced with glass fibers. Mater Struct 52:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.N.R. Dt, 215 (2018) Guide for the design and construction of fiber reinforced inorganic matrix systems for strengthening existing structures. Italian Council of Research (CNR), Rome

  • Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S (2010) The use of the diagonal compression test to identify the shear mechanical parameters of masonry. Constr Build Mater 24(5):677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castori G, Corradi M, Sperazini E (2021) Full size testing and detailed micro-modeling of the in-plane behavior of FRCM–reinforced masonry. Const Build Mater 299:124276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng S, Yin S, Jing L (2020) Comparative experimental analysis on the in-plane shear performance of brick masonry walls strengthened with different fiber reinforced materials. Constr Build Mater 259:120387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNR (2013) Italian National Research Council. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures. CNR-DT-200 R1/2013

  • Corradi M, Borri A (2018) A database of the structural behavior of masonry in shear. Bull Earthq Eng 16(9):3905–3930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi M, Borri A, Vignoli A (2002) Strengthening techniques tested on masonry structures struck by the Umbria–Marche earthquake of 1997–1998. Constr Build Mater 16(4):229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi M, Borri A, Castori G, Sisti R (2016) The Reticulatus method for shear strengthening of fair-faced masonry. Bull Earth Eng 14:3547–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi M, Borri A, Poverello E, Castori G (2017) The use of transverse connectors as reinforcement of multi-leaf walls. Mater Struct 50:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi M, Sisti R, Borri A (2018) Effect of thin cement-based renders on the structural response of masonry wall panels. Appl Sci 8:98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSA (2010) Design of masonry structures, CSA S304.1-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada

  • D'Ambra C, Lignola GP, Prota A (2021) Simple method to evaluate FRCM strengthening effects on in-plane shear capacity of masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 263:121125

  • D’Antino T, Carozzi FG, Poggi C (2019) Diagonal shear behavior of historic walls strengthened with composite reinforced mortar (CRM). Mater Struct 52(6):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Felice G, De Santis S, Garmendia L, Ghiassi B, Larrinaga P, Lourenço PB et al (2014) Mortar-based systems for externally bonded strengthening of masonry. Mater Struct 47:2021–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Zoppo M, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A, Prota A (2019a) Experimental in-plane shear capacity of clay brick masonry panels strengthened with FRCM and FRM composites. J Compos Constr 23(5):04019038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Zoppo M, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A, Prota A (2019b) In-plane shear capacity of tuff masonry walls with traditional and innovative composite reinforced mortars (CRM). Constr Build Mater 210:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Zoppo M, Di Ludovico M, Prota A (2019c) Analysis of FRCM and CRM parameters for the in-plane shear strengthening of different URM types. Compos B Eng 171:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Zoppo M, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A, Prota A (2020) Diagonal compression testing of masonry panels with irregular texture strengthened with inorganic composites. Mater Struct 171:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizhur D, Ingham J (2013) Diagonal tension strength of vintage unreinforced clay brick masonry wall panels. Constr Build Mater 43:418–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Deng M, Dai J, Ma P (2021) Diagonal compressive behavior of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar added with short PVA fibers. Eng Struct 246:113034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnini J, Maracchini G, Lenci S, Corinaldesi L, Quagliarini E (2021) TRM reinforced tuff and fired clay brick masonry: Experimental and analytical investigation on their in-plane and out-of-plane behavior. Const Build Mater 272:121643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN 1992-1-1:2004+A1:2014 (2015) Eurocode 2—design of concrete structures: part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

  • Faella C, Martinelli E, Nigro E, Paciello S (2010) Shear capacity of masonry walls externally strengthened by a cement-based composite material: an experimental campaign. Constr Build Mater 24:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti F, Mazzotti C (2021) FRCM/SRG strengthened masonry in diagonal compression: experimental results and analytical approach proposal. Constr Build Mater 283:122766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattesco N, Boem I (2015) Experimental and analytical study to evaluate the effectiveness of an in-plane reinforcement for masonry walls using GFRP meshes. Constr Build Mater 88:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattesco N, Boem I (2019) Review of experimental tests and numerical study on masonry vaults reinforced through fiber-reinforced mortar coating. Bull Earthq Eng 17:4027–4048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattesco N, Boem I, Dudine A (2015) Diagonal compression tests on masonry walls strengthened with a GFRP mesh reinforced mortar coating. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1703–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2008) Recommendations for design and construction of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites with multiple fine cracks (HPFRCC), JSCE, Tokyo, 88

  • Kadam SB, Singh Y, Li B (2014) Strengthening of unreinforced masonry using welded wire mesh and micro-concrete–Behaviour under in-plane action. Constr Build Mater 54:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kržan M, Gostič S, Cattari S, Bosiljkov V (2015) Acquiring reference parameters of masonry for the structural performance analysis of historical buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 13:203–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YM, Biggs D, Wotherspoon L, Ingham JM (2014a) In-plane strengthening of unreinforced concrete masonry wallettes using ECC shotcrete. J Struct Eng 140(11):04014081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YW, Wotherspoon L, Scott A, Ingham JM (2014b) In-plane strengthening of clay brick unreinforced masonry wallettes using ECC shotcrete. Eng Struct 66:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo F, Cascardi A, Lassandro P, Aiello MA (2021) Thermal and seismic capacity improvements for masonry building heritage: a unified retrofitting system. Sustainability 13:1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchini SS, Facconi L, Minelli F, Plizzari G (2020) Retrofitting unreinforced masonry by steel fiber reinforced mortar coating: uniaxial and diagonal compression tests. Mater Struct 50:144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maione A, Casapulla C, Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Ceroni F (2021) Efficiency of injected anchors in connecting T–shaped masonry walls: a modelling approach. Constr Build Mater 301:124051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli E, Perri F, Sguazzo C, Faella C (2016) Cyclic shear-compression tests on masonry walls strengthened with alternative configurations of CFRP strips. Bull Earthq Eng 14(6):1695–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) (2011) Building code requirements for masonry structures, TMS 402/ASCE 5/ACI 530, New York

  • Meriggi P, De Santis S, Fares S, De Felic G (2021) Design of the shear strengthening of masonry walls with fabric reinforced cementitious matrix. Constr Build Mater 279:122452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezrea PE, Ispir M, Balci IA, Bal IE, Ilki A (2021) Diagonal tensile tests on historical brick masonry wallets strengthened with fabric reinforced cementitious mortar. Structures 33:935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco A, Minafò G, Cucchiara C, D’Anna J, La Mendola L (2017) Finite element analysis of the out-of-plane behavior of FRP strengthened masonry panels. Compos B Eng 115:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafaraj E, Yardim Y (2019) Retrofitting damaged unreinforced masonry using external shear strengthening techniques. J Build Eng 26:100913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafaraj E, Yardim Y, Corradi M, Borri A (2020) Polypropylene as a retrofitting material for shear walls. Materials 13:2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafgholipour MA, Dehghan SM, Kamrava AR (2018) In-plane shear behavior of masonry walls strengthened with steel fiber-reinforced concrete overlay. Asian J Civ Eng 19:553–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskouei AV, Jafari A, Bazli M, Ghahri R (2018) Effect of different retrofitting techniques on in-plane behavior of masonry wallettes. Constr Build Mater 169:578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi F, Iovinella I, Balsamo A, Augenti N, Prota A (2013) In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix-grid composites. Compos Part B Eng 45:1657–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi F, Balestrieri C, Varum H (2019) Nonlinear finite element model for traditional adobe masonry. Constr Build Mater 223:450–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prota A, Marcari G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G, Aldea C (2006) Experimental inplane behavior of tuff masonry strengthened with cementitious matrix-grid composites. J Compos Constr 10:1081–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prota A, Manfredi G, Nardone F (2008) Assessment of design formulas for in-plane FRP strengthening of masonry walls. J Compos Constr 12:643–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos LF, Marques L, Lourenço PB, De Roeck G, Campos-Costa A, Roque J (2010) Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: two case studies. Mech Syst Sig Process 24(5):1291–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RILEM TC 76-LUM (1994) Diagonal tensile strength of small walls specimens. RILEM Publications SARL

  • Roca P, Cervera M, Gariup G, Pelá L (2010) Structural analysis of masonry historical construction: classical and advanced approaches. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(3):299–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval OJ, Takeuchi C, Carrillo J, Barahona B (2021) Performance of unreinforced masonry panels strengthened with mortar overlays reinforced with welded wire mesh and transverse connectors. Const Build Mater 267:121054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabdin M, Zargaran M, Attari NKA (2018) Experimental diagonal tension (shear) test of un-reinforced masonry (URM) walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Constr Build Mater 164:704–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabdin M, Zargaran M, Attari NKA (2021) New formulation for predicting diagonal tension capacity of masonry brick walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Mater Struct 54:62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shermi C, Dubey RN (2018) In-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry panel strengthened with welded wire mesh and mortar. Constr Build Mater 178:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siano R, Roca P, Camata G, Sepe V, Spacone E, Petracca M (2019) Numerical investigation of nonlinear equivalent-frame models for regular masonry walls. Eng Struct 173:512–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva PF, Yu P, Nanni A (2008) Monte Carlo simulation of shear capacity of URM walls retrofitted by polyurea reinforced GFRP grids. J Compos Constr 12(4):405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamboo JA (2020) Material characterisation of thin layer mortared clay masonry. Constr Build Mater 230:116932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamboo JA, Dhanasekar M (2020) Assessment of the characteristics of lime mortar bonded brickwork wallettes under monotonic and cyclic compression. Constr Build Mater 261:120003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamboo JA, Dhanasekar M, Cheng Y (2013) Flexural and shear bond characteristics of thin bed concrete masonry. Constr Build Mater 46:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thermou GE, De Santis S, De Felice GS, Alotaibi F, Roscini F, Hajirasouliha I, Guadagnini M (2021) Bond behaviour of multi-ply steel reinforced grout composites. Constr Build Mater 305:124750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy D, Singhal V (2021) Strengthening of weak masonry assemblages using wire reinforced cementitious matrix (WRCM) for shear and flexure loads. Const Build Mater 277:122223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaculik J, Visintin P, Burton NG, Griffith MC, Seracino R (2018) State-of-the-art review and future research directions for FRP-to-masonry bond research: test methods and techniques for extraction of bond-slip behavior. Constr Build Mater 183:325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valluzzi MR, Binda L, Modena C (2005) Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Constr Build Mater 19:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voon KC, Ingham JM (2007) Design expression for the in-plane shear strength of reinforced concrete masonry. J Struct Eng 133:706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Sarhosis V, Nikitas N (2018) Strengthening/retrofitting techniques on unreinforced masonry structure/element subjected to seismic loads: a literature review. Open Constr Build Technol J 12:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yardim Y, Lalaj O (2016) Shear strengthening of unreinforced masonry wall with different fiber reinforced mortar jacketing. Const Build Mater 102:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra T, Jelvehpour A, Thamboo JA, Dhanasekar M (2018) Interfacial transition zone modelling for characterisation of masonry under biaxial stresses. Constr Build Mater 188:1221–1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra T, Asad M, Thamboo J (2021a) Effect of geometry on the compression characteristics of 725 bonded brickwork. Structures 32:1408–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra T, Thamboo J, Asad M, Song M (2021b) Experimental investigation on the effectiveness of lateral restrainers to the vertical steel in reinforced masonry walls under axial compression. Constr Build Mater 297:123790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of South Eastern University of Sri Lanka and Northumbria University for the research project.

Funding

The research work reported in this paper is part of a research project undertaken at the Department of Civil Engineering, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka to assess the behaviour of strengthened masonry assemblages. The financial support of this project was provided by the South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, under the research grant of SEU/ASA/RG/2019/02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JT: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft. MC: Data Curation, Writing—review & editing. KP: Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Corradi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thamboo, J., Corradi, M. & Poologanathan, K. Design approach of shear strengthened masonry: welded wire meshes, Reticulatus and cementitious plastering methods. Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 997–1016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01546-1

Keywords

Navigation