Abstract
The study of the seismic response of long bridges under non-uniform seismic excitation date back to the early 80 s. So far, many methods have been developed to estimate the bridge responses under such excitation. Eurocode-8 is considered the first seismic design code that provided a simplified method for linear seismic analysis of long bridges under non-uniform seismic excitation. In this method, earthquake ground motion at each bridge support is decomposed into uniform and relative excitations. Any desired elastic response quantity of bridge for each input is obtained and results are combined using the SRSS combination rule. In this paper, it is shown that the SRSS method leads to very conservative and unrealistic responses. An alternative combination rule is then recommended for response estimation, and random vibration analysis is used to calculate the correlation coefficient between the two mentioned responses. Efficiency evaluation of the proposed method is investigated by Monte Carlo simulation results of nine long bridges with different geometrical and dynamic characteristics. Two simplified mathematical bridge models for longitudinal and transverse directions are developed. Then, a simple mathematical formula for the correlation coefficient is extracted, and its accuracy and performance are evaluated. Finally, it is concluded that the proposed formula is relatively accurate and appears in acceptable results.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig12a_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-022-01517-6/MediaObjects/10518_2022_1517_Fig12b_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson N, Schneider J, Stepp J (1991) Empirical spatial coherency functions for application to soil-structure interaction analyses. Earthq Spectra 7(1):1–27
Berrah M, Kausel E (1992) Response spectrum analysis of structures subjected to spatially varying motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(6):461–470
Biondi S et al (2012) Non-synchronous earthquake motion in bridges design. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering
Camacho VT et al (2021) Effect of spatial variability of seismic strong motions on long regular and irregular slab-girder RC bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 19(2):767–804
Capatti M, et al (2015) Effects of non-synchronous ground motion induced by site conditions on the seismic response of multi-span viaducts. In: 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering
Chopra AK (2007) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, vol 3. Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
Clough RW, J Penzien (1993) Dynamics of structures. 1993. Copyright of applied mechanics & materials
Davenport AG (1964) Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng 28(2):187–196
DebChaudhury A, Gazis GD (1988) Response of MDOF systems to multiple support seismic excitation. J Eng Mech 114(4):583–603
Deodatis G, Saxena V, Shinozuka M (2000) Effect of spatial variability of ground motion on bridge fragility curves. In: Proc of 8th specialty conf on probabilistic mechanics and structural reliability
Falamarz-Sheikhabadi M, Zerva A (2017) Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforced-concrete bridge. Part I: numerical modeling and input excitation. J Earthq Eng. 21(8):1305–1334
Falamarz-Sheikhabadi M, Zerva A (2017) Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforced-concrete bridge. Part II: structural response. J Earthq Eng 21(8):1335–1364
Falamarz-Sheikhabadi M, Zerva A (2017a) Simplified displacement loading patterns for incorporation of spatially variable ground motions in bridge seismic design codes. J Bridg Eng 22(6):04017010
Harichandran RS (1991) Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings. Struct Saf 10(1–3):219–233
Heredia-Zavoni E, Santa-Cruz S, Silva-González FL (2015) Modal response analysis of multi-support structures using a random vibration approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(13):2241–2260
Hosseinnezhad A, Gholizad A (2020) Investigating the effect of pseudo-static components on bridge structures under multiple support excitations using conditional simulated records. J Rehabi Civ Eng 8(4):173–196
Kiureghian AD (1996) A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(1):99–111
Kiureghian AD, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(8):713–740
Lavorato D et al (2017) Generation of non-synchronous earthquake signals. Risk and reliability analysis: theory and applications. Springer, pp 169–198
Lavorato D et al (2018) Asynchronous earthquake strong motion and RC bridges response. J Traffic Trans Eng (english Edition) 5(6):454–466
Lavorato D, et al (2017) Surface generation of asynchronous seismic signals for the seismic response analysis of bridges. In: 6th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, COMPDYN 2017. National technical university of athens
Lou L, Zerva A (2005) Effects of spatially variable ground motions on the seismic response of a skewed, multi-span, RC highway bridge. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(7–10):729–740
Luco J, Wong H (1986) Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14(6):891–908
Lupoi A et al (2005) Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(4–5):327–348
Meibodi A, Alexander N (2021) Spatiotemporal seismic excitation of bridges with an anti-symmetrical first mode. Bull Earthq Eng 19(4):1957–1977
Monti G, Nuti C, Pinto PE (1996) Nonlinear response of bridges under multisupport excitation. J Struct Eng 122(10):1147–1159
Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM (1992) Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(1):1–20
Nuti C, Vanzi I (2008). Design of bridges for non synchronous seismic motion. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP
Nuti C, Vanzi I (2005) Influence of earthquake spatial variability on differential soil displacements and SDF system response. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(11):1353–1374
Oliveira CS, Hao H, Penzien J (1991) Ground motion modeling for multiple-input structural analysis. Struct Saf 10(1–3):79–93
Özcebe AG, Smerzini C, Bhanu V (2020) Insights into the effect of spatial variability of recorded earthquake ground motion on the response of a bridge structure. J Earthq Eng 24(6):920–946
Papadopoulos SP, Sextos AG (2018) Anti-symmetric mode excitation and seismic response of base-isolated bridges under asynchronous input motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 113:148–161
Papadopoulos SP, Sextos AG (2020) Simplified design of bridges for multiple-support earthquake excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 131:106013
Papadopoulos S et al (2013) Assessment of EC8 procedures for the asynchronous excitation of bridges based on numerical analyses and recorded data. In: 4th ECCOMMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Kos Island, Greece
Powell GH (1979) Missing mass correction in modal analysis of piping systems. K10 - Response of Piping and Equipment, SMIRT-5. Berlin, Germany
Preumont A (2013) Random vibration and spectral analysis/vibrations aléatoires et analyse spectral, vol 33. Springer
Price TE, Eberhard MO (1998) Effects of spatially varying ground motions on short bridges. J Struct Eng 124(8):948–955
Sextos AG, Kappos AJ (2009) Evaluation of seismic response of bridges under asynchronous excitation and comparisons with Eurocode 8–2 provisions. Bull Earthq Eng 7(2):519
Sextos A et al (2015) Multiple support seismic excitation of the Evripos bridge based on free-field and on-structure recordings. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(11):1510–1523
Sextos A, Kappos AJ, Mergos P (2004) Effect of soil-structure interaction and spatial variability of ground motion on irregular bridges: the case of the Krystallopigi bridge. In: Proc., 13th world conf. on earthquake engineering. Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, Canada
Shinozuka M (1987) Stochastic fields and their digital simulation. Stochastic methods in structural dynamics. Springer, pp 93–133
Shinozuka M, Saxena V, Deodatis G (2000) Effect of spatial variation of ground motion on highway structures.
Shiravand M, Parvanehro P (2019) Spatial variation of seismic ground motion effects on nonlinear responses of cable stayed bridges considering different soil types. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 119:104–117
Soyluk K (2004) Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges. Eng Struct 26(11):1573–1583
Su L, Dong SL, Kato S (2006) A new average response spectrum method for linear response analysis of structures to spatial earthquake ground motions. Eng Struct 28(13):1835–1842
Vanmarcke EH, Fenton GA (1991) Conditioned simulation of local fields of earthquake ground motion. Struct Saf 10(1–3):247–264
Zerva A (2016) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: modeling and engineering applications. Crc Press
Zerva A, Harada T (1997) Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherence and strain estimates. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16(7–8):445–457
Zhang Y et al (2009) Random vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(4):620–629
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors did not receive funds, grants, or other support from any organization for the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Parvanehro, P., Shiravand, M.R. & Safi, M. A method for linear response analysis of long bridges under multi-support seismic excitation. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 8381–8410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01517-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01517-6