Skip to main content
Log in

A new region-specific empirical model for prediction of ground motion significant duration in Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground motion amplitude, frequency content, and duration are commonly identified as the main features of seismic waves affecting structural demand. Among these parameters, earthquake duration can have a substantial influence on assessment of structural seismic demand. The paper proposes a new empirical model for predicting the significant duration of ground-motion records in Turkey. Significant duration is an important parameter in determining the damage potential of earthquakes and is defined as the time interval between two specific values of Arias intensity. The proposed model is as function of moment magnitude (\({M}_{w}\)), Joyner-Boore distance (\({R}_{jb}\)), time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m (\({V}_{S30}\)), and fault mechanism (\({F}_{m}\)). In the regression process, a database consisting of 850 records from 408 earthquakes in Turkey is used. According to the physics of the problem, mixed effect regression is employed. Next, besides residual analysis, comparison of the mean values with the other prediction models are performed. The results of this study indicate that the new model is satisfactory while reliable estimates of significant duration could be assessed for the Turkish region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFAD (2020). Disaster and emergency management presidency. Turkish accelerometric database and analysis system, Retrieved from https://tadas.afad.gov.tr

  • Afshari K, Stewart JP (2016) Physically parameterized prediction equations for significant duration in active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 32(4):2057–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S et al (2014) Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE). Bull Earthq Eng 12(1):311–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen RJ (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, pp 438–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrampouri M et al (2021) Ground motion prediction equations for significant duration using the KiK-net database. Earthq Spectra 37(2):903–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belejo A et al (2017) Influence of ground motion duration on damage index-based fragility assessment of a plan-asymmetric non-ductile reinforced concrete building. Eng Struct 151:682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ et al (2009) Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(6):3217–3233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz A (2006) Estimation of earthquake insurance premium rates based stochastic methods. M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, Northern Cyprus

    Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Wang G (2017) Prediction equations for ground-motion significant durations using the NGA-West2 database. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(1):319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman TY et al (2018) Seismotectonic database of Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 16(8):3277–3316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst M et al (2019) Effect of ground motion duration on reinforced concrete shear wall buildings. Earthq Spectra 35(1):311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad A, Moustafa MA (2019) Shake table tests of special concentric braced frames under short and long duration earthquakes. Eng Struct 200:109695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AL, Billah AHMM (2020) Influence of ground motion duration and isolation bearings on the seismic response of base-isolated bridges. Eng Struct 222:111129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, B. and Cotton, F. (1999). Empirical determination of the ground shaking duration due to an earthquake using strong motion accelerograms for engineering applications

  • Kadirioğlu FT et al (2018) An improved earthquake catalogue (M ≥ 4.0) for Turkey and its near vicinity (1900–2012). Bull Earthq Eng 16(8):3317–3338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaklamanos J et al (2011) Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground-motion prediction equations in engineering practice. Earthq Spectra 27(4):1219–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton JJ, Stewart JP (2006) Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects. Earthq Spectra 22(4):985–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashayekhi M et al (2020) Incorporation of strong motion duration in incremental-based seismic assessments. Eng Struct 223:111144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meimandi-Parizi A et al (2020) Ground-motion models for the prediction of significant duration using strong-motion data from Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110(1):319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan O, Tapirdamaz MC, Yörük A (2008) The earthquake catalogues for Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci 17:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Örgülü G (2011) Seismicity and source parameters for small-scale earthquakes along the splays of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) in the Marmara Sea. Geophys J Int 184(1):385–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y et al (2019) Effects of ground motion duration on the seismic damage to and collapse capacity of a mid-rise woodframe building. Eng Struct 197:109451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandıkkaya MA, Akkar S (2017) Cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity and significant duration predictive models from a pan-European strong-motion dataset. Bull Earthq Eng 15(5):1881–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandıkkaya MA et al (2010) Site classification of Turkish national strong-motion stations. J Seismolog 14(3):543–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford PJ (2014) Crossed and nested mixed-effects approaches for enhanced model development and removal of the ergodic assumption in empirical ground-motion models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(2):702–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G et al (2016) A general definition of integrated strong motion duration and its effect on seismic demands of concrete gravity dams. Eng Struct 125:481–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W et al (2021) Influence of ground motion duration on the seismic performance of earth slopes based on numerical analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 143:106595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollin C et al (2018) A unified earthquake catalogue for the Sea of Marmara Region, Turkey, based on automatized phase picking and travel-time inversion: Seismotectonic implications. Tectonophysics 747–748:416–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Makaremi S (2017) Development of duration-dependent damage-based inelastic response spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(5):771–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S et al (2014) A new model for the prediction of earthquake ground-motion duration in Iran. Nat Hazards 70(1):69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is not any funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Karimzadeh, S., Ebrahimi, M. et al. A new region-specific empirical model for prediction of ground motion significant duration in Turkey. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 4919–4936 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01417-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01417-9

Keywords

Navigation