Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of magnitude and distance on spectral and pseudospectral acceleration proximities for high damping ratio

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spectral absolute acceleration, Sa, is a useful tool for estimating the inertial force that is of interest in foundation design particularly for buildings with energy dissipation or seismic isolation systems. Nevertheless, seismic codes typically specify only the pseudospectral acceleration, Spa. Many studies have been performed to clarify the relationship between Sa and Spa in order to relate the two spectra. A recent study indicated that this relationship could be affected not only by the structural damping ratio and period but also by seismological parameters such as magnitude and distance. However, how these seismological parameters affect their relationship is not clearly understood. To clarify this issue, an approach that relates the two spectra and includes seismological parameters is proposed herein based on random vibration theory. The proposed approach is verified by comparison with the results of time-series analysis. Furthermore, the effects of moment magnitude and source-to-site distance are explored and explained based on the proposed approach. It is found that although Sa becomes larger than Spa as the structural period and damping ratio increases, this increase becomes smaller with increasing moment magnitude and source-to-site distance due to the increase in the long-period components of earthquake ground motions. Finally, a practical formulation for estimating Sa from Spa considering the seismological effects is constructed and verified using real seismic records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Available upon request.

References

  • Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Ay BÖ (2014) Compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical-to-horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader Europe region. Bull Earthq Eng 12:517–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamilla JL, Rodriguez JA, Vai R (2020) Unification of different approaches to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110(6):2816–2827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), (2001) Recommendations for design of building foundations, AIJ, Tokyo. (In Japanese)

  • ASCE/SEI 7-16 (2016) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2014) The attenuation of Fourier amplitudes for rock sites in eastern north America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(1):513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6A):1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1984) A note on the use of random vibration theory to predict peak amplitudes of transient signals. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5):2035–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Thompson EM (2012) Empirical improvements for estimating earthquake response spectra with random-vibration theory. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(2):761–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Thompson EM (2014) Path durations for use in the stochastic-method simulation of ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):2541–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Thompson EM (2015) Revisions to some parameters used in stochastic-method simulations of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(2A):1029–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2001) Comparison of AA, PA and RV, PV for ML = 4.5 and 7.1 earthquakes. http://daveboore.com/daves_notes/aa_pa_rv_pv_2.pdf.

  • Boore DM (2005) SMSIM: Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: version 2.3, A Revision of OFR 96–80-A, U.S. Geol Surv Dep Interior

  • Boore DM (2015) Point-source stochastic-method simulations of ground motions for the PEER NGA-East project, in NGA-East: median ground-motion models for the central and Eastern North America Region, Chapter 2, PEER Report 2015/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 11–49

  • Cartwright DE and Longuet-Higgins MS (1956) The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 237:212–232

  • Chang KC, Lin YY (2004) Seismic response of full-scale structure with added viscoelastic dampers. J Struct Eng 130(4):600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2007) Elastic response spectrum: a historical note. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 36(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou MC, Soong TT, Dargush GF (1998) Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit, monograph series, MCEER, Buffalo, New York

  • Craifaleanu IG (2011) Investigation of the frequency content of ground motions recorded during strong Vrancea earthquakes, based on deterministic and stochastic indices. Eighth International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN, Leuven, Belgium, July 4–6, paper no. MS16–832 (on CD/ROM)

  • Davenport AG (1964) Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng 28(2):187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2021) Ground motion prediction equations 1964–2021. http://www.gmpe.org.uk

  • Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization

  • Jenschke VA, Clough RW, and Penzien J (1964) Analysis of earth motion accelerograms. Report No. SESM 64–1, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Jenschke VA, Clough RW, and Penzien J (1965) Characteristics of strong ground motions. Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering III, New Zealand, 125–142

  • Kottke AR, Rathje EM (2013) Comparison of time series and random-vibration theory site-response methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(3):2111–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YY, Chang KC (2003) Study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motion. J Struct Eng 129(2):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Pezeshk S (1999) An Improvement on the estimation of pseudoresponse spectral velocity using RVT method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(5):1384–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentrasti L (2008) Estimate of spectral and pseudo-spectral acceleration proximity. Eng Struct 30(9):2338–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F and Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures. From theory to practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • Newmark NM, Rosenblueth E (1971) Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam NC, Jennings PC (1969) Calculation of response spectra from strong-motion earthquake records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59(2):909–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki Y (1996) Building vibration theory. Shokokusha Publishing Co., Ltd, Tokyo (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannopoulos GA, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2013) Recovery of spectral absolute acceleration and spectral relative velocity from their pseudo-spectral counterparts. Earthq Struct 4(5):489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pu W, Kasai K, Kabando EK, Huang B (2016) Evaluation of the damping modification factor for structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 14:1519–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Ozbey MC (2006) Site-specific validation of random vibration theory-based seismic site response analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(7):911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadek F, Mohraz B, Riley MA (2000) Linear static and dynamic procedures for structures with velocity–dependent dampers. J Struct Eng 126(8):887–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Chu YL, Liang Z, Lee GC (2007) Estimation of peak relative velocity and peak absolute acceleration of linear SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 6(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1975) On the distribution of the first-passage time for normal stationary random processes. J Appl Mech 42(1):215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS and Newmark NM (1964) Response spectra for single-degree-of freedom elastic and inelastic systems. Report No. RTD-TDR-63–3096, vol. III, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM

  • Wada A, Huang YH, Iwata M (2000) Passive damping technology for buildings in Japan. Prog Struct Mat Eng 2(3):335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Rathje EM (2016) Influence of peak factors on site amplification from random vibration theory based site-response analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(4):1733–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff ED, Ipek C, Constantinou MC, Tapan M (2014) Effect of viscous damping devices on the response of seismically isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(2):185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HZ, Zhao YG (2020) Damping modification factor based on random vibration theory using a source-based ground-motion model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 136:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Bai Y, Gao J (2016) Probe into several important concepts in Chinese current seismic response spectra. J Build Struct 37(4):110–118 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51738001); the support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are also grateful to Baojian Hang for help with the illustration of the figures in this paper. The authors also wish to thank Associate Editor John Douglas, Prof. David M. Boore, Prof. Sanjay Singh Bora as well as an anonymous reviewer for the constructive feedback and comments which led to significant improvements in the article.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51738001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Haizhong Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, writing-original draft preparation, investigation. Yan-Gang Zhao: data curation, visualization, supervision, writing-reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan-Gang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Zhao, YG. Effects of magnitude and distance on spectral and pseudospectral acceleration proximities for high damping ratio. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 3715–3737 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01328-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01328-9

Keywords

Navigation