Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the design spectrum with aggravation factors by 2D nonlinear numerical analyses: a case study in the Gemlik Basin, Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response spectra of multidimensional analyses are compared with one-dimensional (1D) local models to couple the irregular soil stratification effect at a site. In recent studies, the surface motion 2D/1D or 3D/1D spectra ratios are defined as the spectral aggravation factors for each region of a site. Particularly in alluvial basins, where the soil media is typically formed by fault ruptures or topographic depressions filled with sediments, the inclination of the rock outcrop at the edge of the basin has a considerable effect on the site response, and such an effect has not yet been taken into consideration in recent seismic building codes and general engineering applications. In this study, the natural alluvial basin near the North Anatolian Fault in Gemlik, Marmara region, Turkey, was investigated by 40 seismic site tests and 4 validation borings. The 2D and 1D nonlinear response history analyses in the north–south and east–west directions in the Gemlik basin were performed by numerical models on a finite difference scheme considering nonlinear elastoplastic material behaviors and geometric discontinuities. Twenty-two strong ground motions recorded at the rock site were excited vertically as SH waves. The numerical results showed that narrow basin effects were derived not only by reflection, refraction, and shifting behavior but also by the focusing and superposition of the seismic waves propagating from opposite basin edges. As a result, the site-specific spectral aggravation factors SAF2D/1D defined by the ratio between the 2D and 1D acceleration response spectra for each period and any location on the site were proposed for the Gemlik basin. The variations in the aggravation factors were observed as values increasing to 1.2–2.2 near the edge and at the basin center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham JR, Smerzini C, Paolucci R, Lai CG (2016) Numerical study on basin-edge effects in the seismic response of the Gubbio valley, Central Italy. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9890-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AFAD Earthquake Catalog (2020) Disaster and emergency management authority presidential of earthquake department, https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/. Accessed Sept 2020

  • Aki K, Larner K (1970) Surface motion of a layered medium having an irregular interface due to incident plane SH waves. J Geophys Res 75:933–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir BS, Özkan MY, Ciliz S (2002) Effects of basin edge on the distribution of damage in 1995 Dinar Turkey Earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(4):335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00015-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard P, Bouchon M (1980) The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part 1. The Case of Incident SH Waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(4):1263–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielak J, Jifeng X, Ghattas O (1999) Earthquake ground motion and structural response in alluvial valleys. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 125(5):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J Earthq Eng 8(January 2015):43–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-García FJ, Faccioli E (2000) Complex site effects and building codes: making the leap. J Seismol 4:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-García FJ et al (2018) Site effects using methods based on lateral homogeneity and laterally heterogeneous media: an impossible marriage? Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0296-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipta A, Cummins P, Irsyam M, Hidayati S (2018) Basin resonance and seismic hazard in Jakarta, Indonesia. Geosciences 8(4):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSMOS Virtual Data Center (VDC) (2020) https://www.strongmotioncenter.org/. Accessed Sept 2020

  • Cundall PA (2001) FLAC manual: a computer program for Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (first revision) Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

  • Gil-Zepeda SA, Montalvo-Arrieta JC, Vai R, Sanchez-Sesma FJ (2003) A hybrid indirect boundary element-discrete wave number method applied to simulate the seismic response of stratified alluvial valleys. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00092-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves RW, Pitarka A, Somerville PG (1998) Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area: Effects of shallow basin-edge structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(5):1224–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasal ME, Iyisan R, Yamanaka H (2018) Basin edge effect on seismic ground response: a parametric study for Duzce basin case, Turkey. Arab J Sci Eng 43(4):2069–2081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2971-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T (1977) P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, pp 127–32

  • Itasca Consulting Group (2017) FLAC3D Manual—fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in three-dimensions. Minneapolis

  • Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test results. Tech J Chamber Civil Eng Turkey 7:1187–1199 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyisan R, Haşal ME (2011) The basin edge effect on dynamic response: dinar basin model. IMO Teknik Dergi 10:5559–5578 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyisan R, Khanbabazadeh H (2013) A numerical study on the basin edge effect on soil amplification. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1305–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Road Association (JRA) (1980) Specification and interpretation of bridge design for highway-part V: resilient design

  • Katsanos EI, Sextos AG, Manolis GD (2010) Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(4):157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawase H (1996) The cause of the damage belt in Kobe. The basin-edge effect, constructive interference of the direct S wave with the basin-induced diffracted/Rayleigh waves. Seismol Res Lett 67(5):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawase H, Aki K (1989) A study of the response of a soft basin for incident S, P, and Rayleigh waves with special reference to the long duration observed in Mexico City. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(5):1361–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanbabazadeh H, Iyisan R (2014) A numerical study on the 2D behavior of the single and layered clayey basins. Bull Earthq Eng 12(4):1515–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9590-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanbabazadeh H, Iyisan R, Ansal A, Hasal ME (2016) 2D nonlinear seismic response of the Dinar basin, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 89:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanbabazadeh H, Iyisan R, Ansal A, Zulfikar C (2017) (2018) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of the basins with 2D bedrock. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 107(August):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanbabazadeh H, Hasal ME, Iyisan R (2019) 2D Seismic response of the Duzce Basin, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Tucker BE (1984) Observed variations of earthquake motion across a sediment-filled basin. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(1):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo K, Kanno T, Okada H, Özel O, Erdik M, Sasatani T, Higashi S, Takahashi M, Yoshida K (2002) Site specific issues for strong ground motions during the Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999, as inferred from array observations of microtremors and aftershocks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:448–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makra K, Chávez-García FJ (2016) Site effects in 3D basins using 1D and 2D models: an evaluation of the differences based on simulations of the seismic response of Euroseistest. Bull Earthq Eng 14(4):1177–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9862-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka T, Umezawa N, Makishima H (1996) Experimental studies on the applicability of the spatial autocorrelation method for estimation of geological structures using microtremors. Butsuri Tansa 49:26–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Moczo P, Kristek J, Bard PY et al (2018) Key structural parameters affecting earthquake ground motion in 2D and 3D sedimentary structures. Bull Earthq Eng 16:2421–2450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0345-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada H (2006) Theory of efficient array observations of microtremors with special reference to the SPAC method. Explor Geophys 37(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada H (2003) The microtremor survey method (translated by Koya Suto): geophysical monograph series, no. 12. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801740

  • Okay AI, Göncüoğlu MC (2004) The Karakaya Complex: a review of data and concepts. Tuırk J Earth Sci 13:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Özaslan B, Haşal ME, Khanbabazadeh H, Akbaş M, İyisan R (2020) Dynamic response analysis of trapezoidal basins on numerical models. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/960/4/042048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Kim J (1991) Study of the propagation and amplification of seismic waves in Caracas Valley with reference to the 29 July 1967 earthquake: SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(6):2214–2233

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER Ground Motion Database (2020) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/ Accessed Sept 2020

  • Pei D, Papageorgiou AS (1996) Locally generated surface waves in Santa Clara Valley: analysis of observations and numerical simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2020) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures-volume I: part 1 provisions, part 2 commentary-FEMA P.2082-1, Building Seismic Safety Council. Washington, DC

  • Riga E, Makra K, Pitilakis K (2016) Aggravation factors for seismic response of sedimentary basins: a code-oriented parametric study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 91:116–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riga E, Makra K, Pitilakis K (2018) Investigation of the effects of sediments inhomogeneity and nonlinearity on aggravation factors for sedimentary basins. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 110:284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semblat JF, Kham M, Parara E, Bard PY, Pitilakis K, Makra K, Raptakis D (2005) Seismic wave amplification: basin geometry vs soil layering. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(7–10):529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WD (1975) The application of finite element analysis to body wave propagation problems. Geophys J 42:747–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, Graves RW (2003) Characterization of earthquake strong ground motion. Pure Appl Geophys 160(10–11):1811–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-003-2407-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambouli A, Bard PY; Chaljub E, Moczo P; Kristek J, Stripajova S, Durand C, Zendagui D, Derras B (2018) 2D/1D aggravation factors: from a comprehensive study to estimation with a Neural Network model. In: 16th European conference of earthquake engineering, EAEE + AUTH, Jun 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece. ffhal-01826955f

  • Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1974) Scattering of plane SH waves by a semi-elliptical canyon. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto H, Iwamoto K, Saito T, Yoshida A (1997) Discussion on sensor location in circular array for spatial autocorrelation method. In: Proceedings of the 96th SEGJ conference, pp 444–447

  • Yamanaka H (2005) Comparison of performance of Heuristic Search Methods for phase velocity inversion in shallow surface wave method. J Environ Eng Geophys 10(2):163–173. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG10.2.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka H, Ishida H (1996a) Application of Genetic Algorithms to an inversion of surface-wave dispersion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:436–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka H, Ishida H (1996b) Application of genetic algorithms to an inversion of surface-wave dispersion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2):436–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka H (1989) Study on seismic wave propagation in sedimentary layers with irregular interfaces. Dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan

  • Zhang B, Papageorgiou AS (1996) Simulation of the response of the Marina District Basin, San Francisco, California, to the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(5):1382–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Thambiratnam D (2016) Interaction of geometry and mechanical property of trapezoidal sedimentary basins with incident SH waves. Bull Earthq Eng 14(11):2977–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9938-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Thambiratnam D, Gallage C (2018) Statistical analysis of the additional amplification in deep basins relative to the 1D approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the grant 218M959 project titled “Determination of Spectral Aggravation Factors in Alluvial Basins by Nonlinear Numerical Analysis.” In addition, the authors would like to express special thanks to Bursa Metropolitan Municipality for the supplied seismic field testing equipment and the permissions taken for the investigation to be carried out at the site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Ozaslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability

All data of the analyses and models or codes that clarify this investigation's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozaslan, B., Iyisan, R., Hasal, M.E. et al. Assessment of the design spectrum with aggravation factors by 2D nonlinear numerical analyses: a case study in the Gemlik Basin, Turkey. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 1371–1395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01296-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01296-6

Keywords

Navigation