Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multivariate analysis of regular and irregular RC bridges and characterization of earthquake behaviour according to stiffness-based indexes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic design of bridges in some respects is more complex than other structures especially due to, in some cases, the a priori unknown shape of the displacement profile of the structure. Bridges of irregular nature and of a certain length can have transversal horizontal displacement profiles (THDP) of the deck that are very dependent on higher frequency modes. Furthermore, the THDP might change significantly during the earthquake action, due to loss of stiffness of some elements rather than others. This makes most nonlinear static pushover methods inaccurate and introduces difficulties in the seismic design of these structures. In this study, several RC bridges which vary in length and irregularity, are analysed with nonlinear dynamic analysis and optimized via genetic algorithms with performance and cost as objectives in the longitudinal and transversal directions separately. The optimized solutions are analysed in terms of their effective stiffness and compared with each other. The results show correlation between the displacement of the stiffer piers and the overall effective stiffness of the structure. This correlation is closely linked to other parameters such as the relative stiffness index. The results and the parameters allow to identify cases in which the bridges develop “long bridge behaviour” in the THDP of the bridge, and also in which situations the longitudinal and transversal peak displacement of critical piers are similar, which is useful knowledge to optimize seismic design in terms of cost and performance. Practical recommendations for the optimization of the seismic design of irregular bridges are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data may be made available upon request.

Code availability

Custom code may be made available upon request.

References

  • Akbari R, Maalek S (2018) A review on the seismic behaviour of irregular bridges. Struct Build. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi M, Ejlali RG, Ghasemi SAM, Talatahari S (2019) Upgraded whale optimization algorithm for fuzzy logic based vibration control of nonlinear steel structure. Eng Struct 192:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybordiani M, Azad K (2019) Optimum design of steel braced frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction. Struct Multidiscip Optim. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02260-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi G, Priestley MJN, Kowalsky M (2013) Displacement-based seismic design of bridges. Struct Eng Int. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149157399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Pavese A, Pinto PE (1993) Progettazione Antisismica di Ponti Non Regolari [Seismic design of irregular bridges] (in italian). Giornate AICAP-93. Pisa

  • Camacho VT, Lopes M, Oliveira CS (2019a) Revising seismic behaviour factors for reinforced concrete bridge design in the longitudinal direction using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00739-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho VT, Horta N, Lopes M, Oliveira CS (2019b) Optimizing earthquake design of reinforced concrete bridge infrastructures based on evolutionary computation techniques. Struct Multidiscip Optim. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02407-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casarotti C, Pinho R (2007) An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bull Earthq Eng 5(3):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005a) EN1998–1: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN - European Committee for Standardisation

  • CEN (2005b) EN 1998–2: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 2: Bridges. CEN - European Committee for Standardisation

  • Chow CK, Yuen SY (2012) A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that diversifies population by its Density. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16(2):149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicleli M, Buddaram S (2007) Comprehensive evaluation of equivalent linear analysis method for seismic-isolated structures represented by sdof systems. Eng Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiari MJ, Urgessa GS, Sheikholarefin S, Dehghan Manshadi SH (2018) Optimization of reinforced concrete frames subjected to historical time-history loadings using DMPSO algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(5):2119–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuffrè A, Pinto PE (1970) Il comportamento del cemento armato per sollecitazioni cicliche di forte intensità. (in italian). Giornale del Genio Civile

  • Gkatzogias KI, Kappos AJ (2019) Direct estimation of seismic response in reduced-degree-of-freedom isolation and energy dissipation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPQ (2010) NP EN 1998–1. National annex to eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. (in Portuguese)

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos AJ, Saiidi MS, Aydinoglu MN, Isakovic T (2012) Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering. In: Seismic design and assessment of bridges, Inelastic methods of analysis and case studies, vol 21, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3943-7

  • Kohrangi M, Bento R, Lopes M (2015) Seismic performance of irregular bridges–comparison of different nonlinear static procedures. Struct Infrastruct Eng Mainten Management Life-Cycle Des Perform 11(12):1632–1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.983938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo L, Castro JM (2017) SelEQ: an advanced ground motion record selection and scaling framework. Adv Eng Softw 114:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F, Fenves G (1999) OpenSEES–open system for earthquake engineering simulation. The Regents of the University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of anaysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. IABSE Symposium of resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads. Lisbon: IABSE pp 15–22

  • Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GN (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi G, Kowalsky M, Powell GH (2008) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Earthq Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2932170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott BD, Park R, Priestley MJN (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. Am Concr Inst (ACI) 79(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • SeismoSoft (2016) SeismoSpect v2016. http://www.seismosoft.com

  • Wang J-Q, Li S, Dezfuli FH, Shahria Alam M (2019) Sensitivity analysis and multi-criteria optimization of SMA cable restrainers for longitudinal seismic protection of isolated simply supported highway bridges. Eng Struct 189:509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge CERis/DECivil from IST for all the support

Funding

Vítor T. Camacho received a grant [Grant number PD/BD/127802/2016] from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais nº1, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal

    Vítor T. Camacho, Mário Lopes & Carlos S. Oliveira

Authors
  1. Vítor T. Camacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mário Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos S. Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vítor T. Camacho.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 5 Case-studies for optimization: LBridge–bridge length; Dir–Direction (Longitudinal-L, Transversal-T); Irreg- Irregularity profile; ADeck–area of the deck cross-section; EQsf–earthquake scale factor; Pier Length–Length of each pier along the bridge (associated to irregularity profile)
Full size table

5,

Table 6 Results for case-study 480_R_L5_A12_EQ1_T relative to the Pareto set solutions
Full size table

6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camacho, V.T., Lopes, M. & Oliveira, C.S. Multivariate analysis of regular and irregular RC bridges and characterization of earthquake behaviour according to stiffness-based indexes. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 415–448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01223-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01223-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation