Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed probabilistic seismic demand models for fragility assessment

  • S.I. : Recent Advances in Seismic Fragility and Vulnerability
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mixture model approach is presented for combining the results of different models or analysis methods into a single probabilistic demand model for seismic assessment. In general, a structure can be represented using models of different type or different number of degrees of freedom, each offering a distinct compromise in computational load versus accuracy; it may also be analysed via methods of different complexity, most notably static versus dynamic nonlinear approaches. Employing the highest fidelity options is theoretically desirable but practically infeasible, at best limiting their use to calibrating or validating lower fidelity approaches. Instead, a large sample of low fidelity results can be selectively combined with sparse results from higher fidelity models or methods to simultaneously capitalize on the frugal nature of the former and the low bias of the latter to deliver fidelity at an acceptable cost. By employing a minimal 5 parameter power-law-based surrogate model we offer two options for forming mixed probabilistic seismic demand models that (i) can combine different models with varying degree of fidelity at different ranges of structural response, or (ii) nonlinear static and dynamic results into a single output suitable for fragility assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

adopted from Aschheim et al. 2019)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

source fragilities, the target, and the mixed fragility are presented

Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The stripe analysis results of both Applications are available on GitHub: https://github.com/TheLambdaLab/MixedModels_paper.git, while the 2D models of the 4-story MRF are available at http://users.ntua.gr/divamva/RCbook.html

Code availability.

The code needed to replicate Applications 1 and 2 is available on GitHub: https://github.com/TheLambdaLab/MixedModels_paper.git.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support has been provided by the Eugenides Foundation in Greece (scholarship for doctoral studies in NTUA grant) and by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) under the powers delegated by the European Commission through the Horizon 2020 program “PANOPTIS-development of a decision support system for increasing the resilience of transportation infrastructure based on combined use of terrestrial and airborne sensors and advanced modelling tools”, Grant Agreement number 769129.

Funding

EU Horizon2020, Grant Agreement number 769129. Eugenides Foundation, Doctoral Grant Scholarship 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A. Chatzidaki: Formal analysis and investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft preparation. D. Vamvatsikos: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akrivi Chatzidaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatzidaki, A., Vamvatsikos, D. Mixed probabilistic seismic demand models for fragility assessment. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 6397–6421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01163-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01163-4

Keywords

Navigation