Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of out-of-plane behavior of non-structural masonry walls using FE simulations

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Having orthotropic two-way bending, out-of-plane (OOP) behavior of non-structural masonry walls is one of the most challenging topics among professional engineers and researchers. This study is devoted to investigate OOP behavior of non-structural masonry walls with in-plane isolated joints to accommodate inter-story drifts. This is done using pre-validated finite element (FE) models of 99 walls with different boundary conditions (BCs), different amount of bed joint reinforcements (BJRs) and different opening details under uniform monotonic OOP pressure. Effect of vertical seismic acceleration is also investigated. Obtained results indicated that BJRs almost always increased ultimate OOP strength of the walls regardless of their BC, opening details, and level of vertical seismic acceleration. However, BJRs did not necessarily increase response modification factor of the walls. Comparing ultimate strengths from FE results with those from yielding line theory (YLT), which is adopted by some codes and guidelines, revealed that YLT is a reliable simplified technique in order to estimate OOP strength of reinforced and unreinforced non-structural masonry walls with or without openings. Both ultimate OOP strength and deformation capacities and response modification factor of the walls are decreased by increasing downward vertical seismic acceleration. This is due to the fact that downward seismic acceleration tends to reduce self-weight axial compression of the walls. From OOP pressure-deformation curves, overstrength and response modification factors of the walls are evaluated and compared with those suggested by ASCE 7. It is seen that walls with openings have significantly higher response modification factors compared with solid walls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI 530 (2013) Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan

  • AS 3700 (2018) Masonry structures. Standards Australia, Sydney

  • ASCE 7 (2016) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

  • Asteris PG, Antoniou ST, Sophianopoulos DS, Chrysostomou CZ (2011) Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art. J Struct Eng ASCE 137(12):1508–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteris PG, Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F, Sarhosis V (2016) A macro-modeling approach for the analysis of infilled frame structures considering the effects of openings and vertical loads. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(5):551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brick Industry Association (2008) Fire resistance of brick masonry. Technical notes on brick construction, vol 16, 1850, Centennial Park Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191

  • Cavaleri L, Zizzo M, Asteris PG (2020) Residual out-of-plane capacity of infills damaged by in-plane cyclic loads. Eng Struct 209:109957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong VL (1993) The behavior of laterally loaded masonry panels with openings. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

  • Code 729 (2017) Guideline for seismic design of non-structural masonry walls reinforced with bed joint reinforcement, No. 729, Deputy of Technical and Infrastructure Development Affairs, Plan and Budget Organization; Tehran, Iran (in Farsi)

  • Di Trapani F, Shing PB, Cavaleri L (2018) Macroelement model for in-plane and out-of-plane responses of masonry infills in frame structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 144(2):04017198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale RG, Essawy AS (1988) OOP bending of concrete block walls. J Struct Eng ASCE 114(1):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 6 (2005) Design of masonry structures—part 1-1, general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, CEN-European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Arede A, Varum H (2016) Experimental evaluation of OOP capacity of masonry infill walls. Eng Struct 111:48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia JP, Lourenco PB (2007) Masonry shear walls subjected to cyclic loading: influence of confinement and horizontal reinforcement. In: 10th North American Masonry conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

  • Graziotti F, Tomassetti U, Sharma S, Grottoli L, Magenes G (2019) Experimental response of URM single leaf and cavity walls in OOP two-way bending generated by seismic excitation. Constr Build Mater 195:650–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MC, Vaculik J, Lam NTK, Wilson J, Lumantarna E (2007) Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:801–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBC (2018) International building code. International Code Council

  • Lawrence (1983) Behaviour of brick masonry walls under lateral loading. Ph.D. thesis, the University of New South Wales

  • Luca FD, Verderame GM, Gomez-Martinez F, Perez-Garcia A (2014) The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12:1999–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Najafgholipour MA, Rajabi AR (2011) The influence of mortar head joints on the in-plane and OOP seismic strength of brick masonry walls. Trans Civ Environ Eng 35(C1):63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Santarsiero G, Manfredi V, Biondi S, Spacone E, Del Gaudio C, Ricci P, Manfredi G, Verderame GM (2019) Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake: the Amatrice case study. Bull Earthq Eng 17:5631–5654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SA (2019) Code 729 the first Iranian guideline for strength-based design of non-structural masonry walls: a verification report. In: 8th international conference on seismology and earthquake engineering (SEE8), Tehran, Iran

  • Noor-E-Khuda S, Dhanasekar M, Thambiratnam DP (2016) An explicit finite element modeling method for masonry walls under OOP loading. Eng Struct 113:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panto B, Silva L, Vasconcelos G, Lourenco PB (2019) Macro-modeling approach for assessment of OOP behavior of brick masonry infill walls. Eng Struct 181:529–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaculik J, Griffith MC (2008) Time-history analysis for unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  • Vaculik J, Griffith MC (2018) OOP shaketable testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Bull Earthq Eng 16(7):2839–2876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vintzileou E (2013) Assessment of innovative solutions for non-load bearing masonry enclosures, final report. Seismic Engineering Research Infrastructures for European Synergies (SERIES), Project No. 227887

  • West HWH, Hodgkinson HR, Haseltine BA (1977) The resistance of brickwork to lateral loading—part 1: experimental methods and results of tests on small specimens and full sized walls. Struct Eng J Inst Struct Eng 55(10):411–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis CR (2004) Design of unreinforced masonry walls for OOP loading. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Zepeda JA, Alcocer SM, Flores LE (2000) Earthquake-resistant construction with multiperforated clay brick walls. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 1541–1548

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Final International University, via Mersin 10, Kyrenia, North Cyprus, Turkey

    Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough & Mohammadreza Golhashem

Authors
  1. Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammadreza Golhashem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., Golhashem, M. Assessment of out-of-plane behavior of non-structural masonry walls using FE simulations. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 6405–6427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00932-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00932-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation