Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Random field model of sequential ground motions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a random field model of sequential ground motions, which considers the spatial correlation between the mainshock and aftershock from a stochastic view. First, the correlation between the mainshock and aftershock under the physical “source–path–local site” mechanism is explained. Based on the mechanism, the point-source model, and uniform-isotropic-medium model, a random single-point model for sequential ground motion with eight basic parameters is presented. Second, the random field model is developed from the random single-point model. More than 1000 pairs of sequential ground motions are used to identify and analyze statistically the basic parameters in the model. Moreover, the probability distribution of each parameter is presented based on copula functions. The results show that the spatial correlations of sequential ground motions can be effectively simulated based on the proposed random field model. Furthermore, it is possible to realistically reproduce the attenuation and time lag of ground motions at a local site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a(t):

Acceleration time history of single-point ground motion

a(rl,t):

Acceleration time history of ground motion field at a local site

r l :

Distance from the center of the local site along the direction of the wave propagation to any point in the field

A(λ,ω,R):

Fourier amplitude spectrum model of the acceleration time histor

Φ(λ,ω,R):

Fourier phase spectrum model of the acceleration time history

λ :

Random vector of the basic parameters

R :

Epicentral distance

ω :

Circular frequency

A 0 :

Amplitude coefficient that represents the influence of the source intensity

τ :

Source coefficient in Brune’s model

a, b, c, and d :

Empirical parameters

ξ g :

Equivalent damping ratio of the local site

ω g :

Equivalent predominant circular frequency of the local site

α 0 :

Attenuation parameter of the local site

c g :

Apparent seismic wave velocity of the local site

Z :

Basic parameter vector of the sequential ground motion

A0, τ, a, b, c, and d :

Two-dimensional random variables used to describe the correlation of the mainshock and aftershock

References

  • Abrahamson NA (1992) Generation of spatially incoherent strong motion time histories. In: Proceedings. pp 845–850

  • Abrahamson NA, Bolt BA, Darragh RB et al (1987) The SMART I accelerograph array (1980–1987): a review. Earthq spectra 3:263–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30:1025–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP et al (2014) NGA-West2 database. Earthq Spectra 30:989–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Båth M (1965) Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle. Tectonophysics 2:483–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciola P, Deodatis G (2011) A method for generating fully non-stationary and spectrum-compatible ground motion vector processes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Xie Q, Li Z et al (2017) Seismic damage to structures in the 2015 Nepal earthquake sequences. J Earthq Eng 21:551–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini U, Luciano E, Vecchiato W (2004) Copula methods in finance. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung RM (1996) January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake: performance of structures, lifelines, and fire protection systems (NIST SP 901)

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1992) Dynamics of structures. 2nd York

  • Conte JP, Pister KS, Mahin SA (1992) Nonstationary ARMA modeling of seismic motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:411–426

    Google Scholar 

  • De Michele C, Salvadori G (2003) A generalized Pareto intensity‐duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2‐copulas. J Geophys Res Atmos 108

  • Embrechts P, McNeil A, Straumann D (2002) Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. Risk Manag Value Risk Beyond 1:176–223

    Google Scholar 

  • GB50011 CS (2010) Code for seismic design of buildings. China Build Ind Press Beijing

  • Goda K (2010) Statistical modeling of joint probability distribution using copula: application to peak and permanent displacement seismic demands. Struct Saf 32:112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Goda K, Salami MR (2014) Inelastic seismic demand estimation of wood-frame houses subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Bull Earthq Eng 12:855–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Ww D, Xw G, Ji Y (2011) Site classification corresponding relationship between Chinese and the overseas seismic design codes. J Civ Eng Manag 2:12 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Han R, Li Y, Van De Lindt J (2015) Assessment of seismic performance of buildings with incorporation of aftershocks. J Perform Constr Facil 29:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao H, Oliveira CS, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nucl Eng Des 111:293–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke EH (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. J Eng Mech 112:154–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1947) Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 37:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Gardoni P, Xu L (2018) Stochastic procedure for the simulation of synthetic main shock-aftershock ground motion sequences. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47:2275–2296

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai K (1961) An empirical formula for the spectrum of strong earthquake motions. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo Jpn 39:85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama T (1991) Use of dense array data in the determination of engineering properties of strong motions. Struct Saf 10:27–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazama M, Noda T (2012) Damage statistics (Summary of the 2011 off the pacific coast of tohoku earthquake damage). Soils Found 52:780–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Konakli K, Der Kiureghian A (2012) Simulation of spatially varying ground motions including incoherence, wave-passage and differential site-response effects. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:495–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Ellingwood BR (2007) Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock–aftershock earthquake sequences. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:405–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao S, Zerva A (2006) Physically compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable seismic ground motions for performance-based design. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:891–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippiello E, Giacco F, Marzocchi W et al (2015) Mechanical origin of aftershocks. Sci Rep 5:15560

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao H, Li J (2017) The coherence function model of ground motion in engineering sites based on physical mechanism. Sci Sin Technol 48:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon L, Dizhur D, Senaldi I et al (2014) The demise of the URM building stock in Christchurch during the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthq Spectra 30:253–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2011) Response of nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom structures to random acceleration sequences. Eng Struct 33:1251–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (2007) An introduction to copulas. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • NIED K-NET KiK-net (2019) National research institute for earth science and disaster resilience. In: National research institute of earth science and disaster resilience

  • Omori F (1894) On the aftershocks of earthquakes. J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo 7:11–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MB (1965) Evolutionary spectra and non-stationary processes. J R Stat Soc Ser B 27:204–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2008) A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1565–1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg JV, Schuermann T (2006) A general approach to integrated risk management with skewed, fat-tailed risks. J Financ Econ 79:569–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García J, Negrete-Manriquez JC (2011) Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences. Eng Struct 33:621–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C (2007) On the use of copulas in hydrology: theory and practice. J Hydrol Eng 12:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Imabayashi H (1999) Real time conditional simulation of earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 1:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields MD (2015) Simulation of spatially correlated nonstationary response spectrum–compatible ground motion time histories. J Eng Mech 141:4014161

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M (1971) Simulation of multivariate and multidimensional random processes. J Acoust Soc Am 49:357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar M (1959) Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Stat Univ Paris 8:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M (2013) Studying random function model of seismic ground motion for engineering purposes. Tongji University

  • Spanos PD, Failla G (2004) Evolutionary spectra estimation using wavelets. J Eng Mech 130:952–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunasaka Y, Kiremidjian AS (1993) A method for structural safety evaluation under mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences. John A, Blume Earthquake Engineering Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajimi H (1960) A statistical method of determing the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: Proceedings of 2nd world conference of earthquake Engineering. pp 781–797

  • Tsai KC, Hsiao CP, Bruneau M (2000) Overview of building damages in 921 Chi-Chi earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 2:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos C, Papakonstantinou KG, Deodatis G (2016) A multi-modal analytical non-stationary spectral model for characterization and stochastic simulation of earthquake ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80:177–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Li J (2011) Physical random function model of ground motions for engineering purposes. Sci China Technol Sci 54:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Li J (2012) A random physical model of seismic ground motion field on local engineering site. Sci China Technol Sci 55:2057–2065

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z (2008) A preliminary report on the Great Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Woessner J, Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S, Mai PM (2006) Spatial correlation of aftershock locations and on‐fault main shock properties. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111

  • Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1979) Generation of artificial strong motion accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:509–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto Y, Baker JW (2013) Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:3044–3056

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo GL, Cornell CA (2009) A probabilistic framework for quantification of aftershock ground-motion hazard in California: methodology and parametric study. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin YJ, Li Y (2011) Loss estimation of light-frame wood construction subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. J Perform Constr Facil 25:504–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai CH, Wen WP, Chen Z et al (2013) Damage spectra for the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 45:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu RG, Lu DG, Yu XH, Wang GY (2017) Conditional mean spectrum of aftershocks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107:1940–1953

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thankfully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1711264) and Tianshan Scholar Program at Xinjiang University. The constructive discussions with Dr. Jiecheng Xiong and Jinju Tao are highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Structural Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Jiaxu Shen & Jun Chen

  2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China

    Jun Chen

  3. East China Architectural Design & Research Institute, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Guo Ding

Authors
  1. Jiaxu Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guo Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, J., Chen, J. & Ding, G. Random field model of sequential ground motions. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 5119–5141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00901-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00901-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation