Abstract
The seismic performance of suspended piping systems can significantly compromise the functionality of critical facilities due to the incorporation of inadequate seismic design based on prescriptive empirical regulations and guidelines. The performance-based seismic design (PBSD) of non-structural elements requires the evaluation of performance parameters, based on experimental data or numerical studies, for comparison with engineering demand parameters. Few research studies available in the literature provide the performance parameters required to enable PBSD of piping systems and more specifically of suspended piping restraint installations. This paper discusses the numerical modelling of suspended piping trapeze restraint installations based on component testing. Reliable numerical models capable of predicting the force–displacement (backbone) curves of suspended piping restraint installations are developed based on monotonic and cyclic test data of the components that make up these installations. The prediction capabilities of the numerical models are assessed against the results of monotonic benchmark sub-assembly tests reported in a previous study. The numerical models developed in this study can be used to extract performance parameters from the predicted force–displacement curves to be used within a probabilistic PBSD framework without the need to conduct additional testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASCE (2017) ASCE/SEI 41-17: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineering Institute, Reston
Blasi G, Aiello MA, Maddaloni G, Pecce MR (2018) Seismic response evaluation of medical gas and fire-protection pipelines’ Tee-Joints. Eng Struct 173:1039–1053
Chock G, Robertson I, Nicholson P, Brandes H, Medley E, Okubo P, Hirshorn B, Sumada J, Kindred T, Linurna G, Sarwar A, Dal Pino J, Holmes W (2006) Compilation of observations of the October 15, 2006, Kiholo Bay (Mw 6.7) and Mahukona (Mw 6.0) earthquakes, Hawaii. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, p 53
Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Magliulo G (2012) Report sui danni registrati a San Felice sul Panaro (Mo) in seguito agli eventi sismici del 20 e 29 maggio 2012 – v1.0. http://www.reluis.it/
FEMA (2007) Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components, FEMA 461. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
FEMA (2011) Quantification of building seismic performance factors: component equivalency methodology, FEMA P-795. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Filiatrault A, Uang CM, Folz B, Christopoulos C, Gatto K (2001) Reconnaissance report of the February 28, 2001 Nisqually (Seattle-Olympia) earthquake. In: Structural systems research project report no. SSRP-2000/15. Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
Filiatrault A, Perrone D, Merino R, Calvi GM (2018a) Performance-based seismic design of non-structural building elements. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1512910
Filiatrault A, Perrone D, Brunesi E, Beiter C, Piccinin R (2018b) Effect of cyclic loading protocols on the experimental seismic performance evaluation of suspended piping restraint installations. Int J Pip Vessels 166:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.08.004
Filippou FC, Popov EP, Bertero VV (1983) Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints. In: Report EERC 83-19, earthquake engineering research center. University of California, Berkeley
Gunay S, Mosalam KM (2013) PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited. J Earthq Eng 17(6):829–858
Gupta A, McDonald BM (2008) Performance of building structures during the October 15, 2006 Hawaii earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing
McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH (2006) OpenSees: open system for earthquake engineering simulation. In: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley. http://opensees.berkeley.edu
Miranda E, Mosqueda G, Retamales R, Pekcan G (2012) Performance of non-structural components during the February 27, 2010 Chile earthquake. Earthq Spectra 28(S1):S453–S471
O’Reilly GJ, Perrone D, Fox M, Monteiro R, Filiatrault A (2018) Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy. Eng Struct 168(1):142–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.056
Perrone D, Calvi PM, Nascimbene R, Fischer E, Magliulo G (2019) Seismic performance and damage observation of non-structural elements during the 2016 Central Italy Earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 17:5655–5677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0361-5
Perrone D, Filiatrault A, Peloso S, Brunesi E, Beiter C, Piccinin R (2020) Experimental seismic performance evaluation of suspended piping trapeze restraint installations. Bull Earthq Eng 18:1499–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00755-5
SEAOC (1995) Performance-based seismic engineering. In: SEAOC vision 2000 committee. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento
Soroushian S, Zaghi AE, Maragakis M, Echevarria A, Tian Y, Filiatrault A (2015a) Analytical seismic fragility analyses of fire sprinkler piping systems with threaded joints. Earthq. Spectra 31(2):1125–1155
Soroushian S, Zaghi AE, Maragakis M, Echevarria A, Tian Y, Filiatrault A (2015b) Seismic fragility study of fire sprinkler piping systems with grooved fit joints. J Struct Eng 141(6):1–15
Tian Y, Filiatrault A, Mosqueda G (2014) Experimental seismic fragility of pressurized fire suppression sprinkler piping joints. Earthq. Spectra 30(4):1733–1748
Tian Y, Filiatrault A, Mosqueda G (2015a) Seismic response of pressurized fire sprinkler piping systems II: numerical study. J. Earthq. Eng. 19:674–699
Tian Y, Filiatrault A, Mosqueda G (2015b) Seismic response of pressurized fire sprinkler piping systems I: experimental study. J. Earthq. Eng. 9:649–673
Wood RL, Hutchinson TC, Hoehler MS, Kreidl B (2014) Experimental characterization of trapeze assemblies supporting suspended non-structural systems. In: Proceedings of the tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 905. Anchorage, Alaska
Acknowledgements
The numerical study described in this paper was conducted as part of a collaborative research program between Hilti Corporation and the European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE) Foundation. The authors are grateful to Hilti Corporation for funding the experimental program. The work has been also developed within the framework of the project “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza”, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research at the University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perrone, D., Brunesi, E., Filiatrault, A. et al. Seismic numerical modelling of suspended piping trapeze restraint installations based on component testing. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 3247–3283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00832-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00832-0