Skip to main content
Log in

Simplified calculation of roof accelerations in existing low-rise symmetric unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A formulation is presented for simplified evaluation of the roof acceleration response for the purpose of assessing non-structural components in unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms excluding torsional effects. The method is based on modal calculations that are further studied through nonlinear time-history analysis (NLTHA) of four case study buildings. The NLTHA results for a relatively small level of ground shaking was used to validate the overall ability of the simplified modal method to predict the diaphragm flexibility effects. The NLTHA results were also used to discuss the effects of the building inelastic response in the conservatism of the simplified modal technique. It was found that, in lieu of a comprehensive modal analysis, it is possible to calculate roof accelerations in symmetric low-rise buildings with flexible diaphragms using a simplified two-mode modal method. Based on this study, a predictive method is proposed for conservative estimation of peak roof accelerations in these buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. The data includes the MDOF analysis input and output files.

References

  • AS [Australian Standards] (2007). “AS 1170.4—structural design actions part 4: earthquake actions in Australia”, Sydney, Australia: Standards Australia

  • ASCE [American Society for Civil Engineering] (2017) ASCE/SEI 41–17: seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K, Tondelli M, Petry S, Peloso S (2015) Dynamic testing of a four-storey building with reinforced concrete and unreinforced masonry walls: prediction, test results and data set. Bull Earthq Eng 13(10):3015–3064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen G, Klinger RE, Hayes JR, Sweeney SC (2004) Seismic evaluation of low-rise reinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. II. Analytical modeling. Earthq Spectra 20(3):803–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ayala D, Meslem A, Vamvatsikos D, Porter K, Rossetto T, Crowley H, Silva V (2014) Guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings—methodology, vulnerability global component project. Available from www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-vulnerability/posts/

  • Derakhshan H, Griffith MC, Ingham JM (2016) Out-of-plane seismic response of vertically spanning URM walls connected to flexible diaphragms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45(4):563–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan H, Nakamura Y, Ingham JM, Griffith MC (2017) Simulation of shake table tests on out-of-plane masonry buildings. Part (I): displacement-based approach using simple failure mechanisms. Int J Archit Heritage 11(1):72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan H, Lucas WD, Griffith MC (2018a) In-situ seismic verification of non-structural components of unreinforced masonry buildings. Aust J Struct Eng 19(1):44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan H, Lucas W, Visintin P, Griffith MC (2018b) Out-of-plane strength of existing two-way spanning solid and cavity unreinforced masonry walls. Structures 13:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] (2012) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model: HAZUS-MH 2.1, technical and user’s manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman RB, Farrow KT (2001) Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(5):745–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giongo I, Wilson A, Dizhur D, Derakhshan H, Tomasi R, Griffith MC, Quenneville P, Ingham JM (2014) Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragms. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 47(2):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Giresini L, Sassu M, Sorrentino L (2018) In situ free-vibration tests on unrestrained and restrained rocking masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziotti F, Penna A, Magenes G (2016) A nonlinear SDOF model for the simplified evaluation of the displacement demand of low-rise URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 14(6):1589–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Cattari S (2014) Fragility functions of masonry buildings (Chapter 5). In: Pitilakis K, Crowley H, Kaynia AM (eds) SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 111–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço PB, Mendes N, Ramos LF, Oliveira DV (2011) Analysis of masonry structures without box behaviour. Int J Archit Heritage 5(4–5):369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumantarna R (2012) Material characterisation of New Zealand’s clay brick unreinforced masonry buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland

  • Magenes G, Penna A, Rota M, Galasco A, Senaldi I (2014) Shaking table test of a full-scale stone masonry building with flexible diaphragms. Int J Archit Heritage 8(3):349–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maison B, McDonald B (2018) Fragility curves for residential masonry chimneys. Earthq Spectra 34(3):1001–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Derakhshan H, Ingham JM, Griffith MC (2014) Seismic analysis of in-plane loaded walls in unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 47(4):275–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Derakhshan H, Sheikh AH, Ingham JM, Griffith MC (2016) Equivalent frame modelling of an unreinforced masonry building with flexible diaphragms—a case study. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 49(3):234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Derakhshan H, Magenes G, Griffith M (2017a) Influence of diaphragm flexibility on seismic response of unreinforced masonry buildings. J Earthq Eng 21(6):935–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1190799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Derakhshan H, Griffith M, Magenes G, Sheikh A (2017b) Applicability of nonlinear static procedures for low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Eng Struct 137:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osteraas J, Krawinkler H (2010) Fragility of masonry chimneys. Federal Emergency Management Agency background document, FEMA P-58/BD-3.9.7. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna A, Lagomarsino S, Galasco A (2014) A nonlinear macro-element model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(2):159–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senaldi I, Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A (2014) The effect of stiffened floor and roof diaphragms on the experimental seismic response of a full-scale unreinforced stone masonry buildings. J Earthq Eng 18(3):407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tena-Colunga A, Abrams DP (1996) Seismic behaviour of structures with flexible diaphragms. J Struct Eng 122(4):439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomassetti U, Correia AA, Graziotti F, Penna A (2019a) Seismic vulnerability of roof systems combining URM gable walls and timber diaphragms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48(11):1297–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomassetti U, Correia AA, Candeias PX, Graziotti F, Campos Costa A (2019b) Two-way bending out-of-plane collapse of a full-scale URM building tested on a shake table. Bull Earthq Eng 17(4):2165–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaževic M, Lutman M, Velechovsky T (1991) The influence of rigidity of floor on the seismic behaviour of old stone-masonry buildings. Eur Earthq Eng 3:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Vintzileou E, Mouzakis C, Adami C-E, Karapitta L (2015) Seismic behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: shaking table tests on a two-storey masonry model. Bull Earthq Eng 13(10):3107–3133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the support of Australian Government through Australian Research Council Early Career Researcher Award (DE180101593). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council through its Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) programme and specifically the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Derakhshan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Derakhshan, H., Nakamura, Y., Griffith, M.C. et al. Simplified calculation of roof accelerations in existing low-rise symmetric unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 3383–3400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00823-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00823-1

Keywords

Navigation