Abstract
Ground motion time-domain stochastic simulations are performed by generating a white or a Gaussian noise, shaping it with a window, loading its normalized spectrum with the spectrum of the motion at a specific site and transforming it back in time-domain (Boore in Pure Appl Geophys 160: 635–676, 2003). The outcome of the resulted simulations is compared to the target parameters, namely amplitude, frequency content and duration parameters. Using SMSIM (Boore in SMSIM: Fortran programs for simulating ground motions form earthquakes, 2005) and EXSIM (Motazedian and Atkinson in Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3): 995–1010, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030207), Coțovanu (J Mil Technol 1(2): 27–32, 2018. https://doi.org/10.32754/jmt.2018.2.05) and Coțovanu and Vacareanu (J Seismol 24(1): 229–241, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09892-5) applied the stochastic simulation method for generating ground motions produced by intermediate-depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes and found inconsistent results for duration parameters (significant duration and energy distribution in time-domain). In simulations, the duration of the motion results from the source and path duration, but the significant duration (that contains 90% of the energy) depends on the way the energy is distributed in time, and this distribution is controlled through a noise shaping window. The objective of this paper is to provide an appropriate form of the shaping window that can describe the specific energy release of ground motions generated by Vrancea intermediate depth seismic source (the first 50–70% of energy being rapidly released, the rest of it having a very slow release). For this matter, 371 recorded motions were analyzed and 5 types of energy release were defined. The set with the above described pattern that contained almost half of the analyzed accelerograms was used to define a mean normalized cumulative energy that describes the Vrancea specificity. On this basis, the parameters for the SMSIM implemented exponential window were determined and, because the results were inconsistent, a more adequate window function was defined and implemented in SMSIM. For the newly defined two-interval window function an algorithm for calculating the parameters was described, and the parameters of the mean release of energy were determined. By using the two-interval function for describing the Vrancea specific release of energy, more appropriate ground motion simulations resulted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amin M, Ang A (1966) A nonstationary stochastic model for strong motion earthquakes. Structural Research series, no. 306, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Arias A, Holzapfel A, Saragoni GR (1976) An approximate expression for the mean square acceleration of earthquake ground motions. In: Fifth world conference on earthquake engineering, Roorkee, India
Benetatos C, Kiratzi A (2004) Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of intermediate depth earthquakes: the cases of the 30 May 1990 Vrancea (Romania) and of the 22 January 2002 Karpathos island (Greece) earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.10.003
Bolotin V (1960) Statistical theory of the aseismic design of structures. In: Proceedings of second world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp 1365–1374
Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–18943
Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676
Boore DM (2005) SMSIM: Fortran programs for simulating ground motions form earthquakes. Version 7.04. U.S. geological survey open-field report, p 55
Constantinescu L, Enescu E (1985) Vrancea earthquakes from scientific and technologic point of view. Editura Academiei (in Romanian)
Coțovanu A (2018) Stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source. J Mil Technol 1(2):27–32. https://doi.org/10.32754/jmt.2018.2.05
Coțovanu A (2019) Continuity and derivability issues in modeling the energy release shaping window in stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source. J Mil Technol 2(2):43–46. https://doi.org/10.32754/jmt.2019.2.07
Coțovanu A, Vacareanu R (2020) Local site conditions modeling in stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth seismic source. J Seismol 24(1):229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09892-5
Douglas J, Aochi H (2008) A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes. Surv Geophys 29(3):187–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y
Ganas A, Grecu B, Batsi E, Radulian M (2010) Vrancea slab earthquake triggerd by static stress transfer. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2565–2577. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-2565-2010
Gusev A, Radulian M, Rizescu M, Panza GF (2002) Source scaling of intermediate-depth Vrancea earthquakes. Geophys J Int 151(3):879–889. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01816.x
Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, user manual. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Martin M, Wenzel F, The CALIXTO Working Group (2006) High-resolution teleseismic body wave tomography beneath SE-Romania (II): imaging of a slab detachment scenario. Geophys J Int 164:579–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.02884.x
Motazedian D, Atkinson G (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030207
Orabi I, Goodarz A, Lin S (1989) Hysteretic column under earthquake excitations. J Eng Mech ASCE 115:33–51
Oth A, Wenzel F, Radulian M (2007) Source parameters of intermediate-depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes from empirical Green’s functions modeling. Tectonophysics 438:33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.02.016
Oth A, Parolai S, Bindi D, Wenzel F (2009) Source spectra and site response from S waves of intermediate-depth Vrancea, Romania, earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:235–254. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080059
Pavel F (2015) Investigation on the stochastic simulation of strong ground motions for Bucharest area. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.008
Pavel F (2017) Investigation on the variability of simulated and observed ground motions for Bucharest area. J Earthq Eng 22(10):1737–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297266
Pavel F, Vacareanu R (2015a) Assessment of the ground motion levels for the Vrancea (Romania) November 1940 earthquake. Nat Hazards 78:1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1767-x
Pavel F, Vacareanu R (2015b) Kappa and regional attenuation for Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. J Seismol 19:791–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9490-3
Pavel F, Vacareanu F (2017) Ground motion simulations for seismic stations in southern and eastern Romania and seismic hazard assessment. J Seismol 21(5):1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9649-1
Pavel F, Popa V, Vacareanu R (2018) Evaluation of soil conditions in Bucharest. In: Impact of long-period ground motions on structural design: a case study for Bucharest, Romania, SpringerBriefs in Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering, pp 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_2
Perumont A (1984) The generation of spectrum compatible accelerograms for the design of nuclear power plants. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12:481–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290120405
Pousse G, Bonilla L, Cotton F, Margerin L (2006) Non stationary stochastic simulation of strong ground motion time histories including natural variability: application to the K-net Japanese database. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):2103–2117. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050134
Radulian M, Bala A, Ardeleanu L, Toma-Danila D, Petrescu L, Popescu E (2019) Revised catalogue of earthquake mechanisms for the events occurred in Romania until the end of twentieth century: REFMC. Acta Geod Geophys 54:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0243-y
Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2008) A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(13):1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.831
Saragoni GR, Hart GC (1974) Simulation of artificial earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2(3):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020305
Shinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random process. J Eng Mech Div 93(1):11–40
Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Wenzel F, Grecu B, Radulian M (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the intermediate depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 6:367–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9065-6
Stafford P (2009) Towards vector implementations of hazard analysis and loss estimation. http://www.reluis.it/doc/pdf/EEBTB/Stafford_EEBTB_Paper.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2019
Yeh C, Wen Y (1990) Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response. Struct Saf 8:281–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90046-r
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coțovanu, A., Vacareanu, R. Modeling energy release parameters in stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 2557–2580 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00805-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00805-3