Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic test on a precast reinforced concrete column-to-foundation grouted duct connection

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A full-scale specimen of a column-to-foundation grouted duct connection suited for buildings and industrial structures is tested in cyclic bending combined with axial compression. The positioning of the steel ducts along the sides of the column cross-section allows for using traditional reinforcement cages for the column, with longitudinal bars at both mid-side and corners of the cross-section. Splice length and amount of transverse reinforcement along the splice are defined based on Eurocode 2 provisions for laps of reinforcing bars. A total of 19 loading cycles are carried out, achieving a drift of 5.3% in correspondence of a degradation of 15% of the peak resistance. The shear slip measured at the column-foundation interface results to be smaller than 5% of the deflection. Conversely, to predict accurately the test results, the slip of the projecting bars within their ducts cannot be neglected. It is proposed to take account of this slip by introducing an apparent strain. For the tested specimen, the apparent strain turns out to be equal to the yield strain of the reinforcement. A comparison with a monotonic bending test, previously conducted on the same connection, shows a strongly smaller deformability when the loading protocol is cyclic. Hysteretic energy and drift ductility for the proposed connection are close to those concerning a cast-in-place specimen of comparable capacity, which was described in a recent paper. The test results show an over-strength of 1.4 and a gain in ductility of 1.8 compared with the design values of bending resistance and curvature ductility computed for the cross-section at the column-foundation interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI (American Concrete Institute) (2013) ACI 374—Guide for testing reinforced concrete structural elements under slowly applied simulated seismic loads. Farmington Hills, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameli MJ, Pantelides CP (2017) Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors. J Struct Eng 143(2):04016176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameli MJ, Brown DN, Parks JE, Pantelides CP (2016) Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves. ACI Struct J 113(5):1021–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Riva P (2012) Seismic performance and retrofit of precast concrete grouted sleeve connections. PCI J 57(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pagani M, Riva P (2015) Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. J Perform Constr Facil 29(5):04014135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovo M, Savoia M (2018) Numerical simulation of seismic-induced failure of a precast structure during the Emilia earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 32(1):04017119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggeling ASG, Huyghe GF (1991) Prefabrication with concrete. A. A Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Buratti N, Bacci L, Mazzotti C (2014) Seismic behaviour of grouted sleeve connections between foundations and precast columns. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Istanbul, August 25–29

  • Buratti N, Minghini F, Ongaretto E, Savoia M, Tullini N (2017) Empirical seismic fragility for the precast RC industrial buildings damaged by the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(14):2317–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEB (Euro-International Committee for Structural Concrete) (1998) CEB-FIP model code 1990—Design code, 2nd edn. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004a) EN 1992-1-1:2004, Eurocode 2—Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004b) EN 1998-1:2004, Eurocode 8—Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Lago B, Toniolo G, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2016) Influence of different mechanical column-foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 14(12):3485–3508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demartino C, Vanzi I, Monti G, Sulpizio C (2018) Precast industrial buildings in Southern Europe: loss of support at frictional beam-to-column connections under seismic actions. Bull Earthq Eng 16(1):259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KS (2017) Precast concrete structures, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Management Emergency Agency) (2000) FEMA 356—Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, D.C

  • FIB (International Federation for Structural Concrete) (2003) Seismic design of precast concrete building structures, Bulletin No. 27, ISBN 978-2-88394-067-3

  • FIB (International Federation for Structural Concrete) (2016) Precast-concrete buildings in seismic areas, Bulletin No. 78, ISBN 978-2-88394-118-2

  • Hua LJ, Rahman ABA, Ibrahim IS (2014) Feasibility study of grouted splice connector under tensile load. Constr Build Mater 50:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMIT (Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport) (2018) Italian Building Code-D.M. 17/01/2018, Rome (in Italian)

  • Kuttab AS, Dougill JW (1988) Grouted and dowelled jointed precast concrete columns—behaviour in combined bending and compression. Magazine of Concrete Research 40(144):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhou B, Cai J, Sang-Hoon Lee D, Deng X, Feng J (2018) Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast concrete column with grouted sleeve connections considering ratios of longitudinal reinforcement and stirrups. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0414-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megalooikonomou KG, Tastani SP, Pantazopoulou SJ (2018) Effect of yield penetration on column plastic hinge length. Eng Struct 156:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minghini F, Ongaretto E, Ligabue V, Savoia M, Tullini N (2016) Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Earthq Struct 11(2):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negro P, Toniolo G (2012) Design guidelines for connections of precast structures under seismic actions. EUR—Scientific and Technical Research Reports. JRC Publication No. JRC71599. Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/37605

  • NI (National Instruments) (2015) LabVIEW 2015 Help. Available at http://www.ni.com/support. Accessed 23 Feb 2015

  • Park R (1988) Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing (State-of-the-Art Report). In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, August 2–9

  • Park R (1995) Perspective on the seismic design of precast concrete structures in New Zealand. PCI J 40(3):40–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) (2004) Structural performance database user’s manual, University of Berkeley. https://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd/. Accessed 1 July 2018

  • Popa V, Papurcu A, Cotofana D, Pascu R (2015) Experimental testing on emulative connections for precast columns using grouted corrugated steel sleeves. Bull Earthq Eng 13(8):2429–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rave-Arango JF, Blandón CA, Restrepo JI, Carmona F (2018) Seismic performance of precast concrete column-to-column lap-splice connections. Eng Struct 172:687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor DJ, Lehman DE, Stanton JF (2002) Bond-slip response of reinforcing bars grouted in ducts. ACI Struct J 99(5):568–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoia M, Buratti N, Vincenzi L (2017) Damages and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Eng Struct 137:162–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen H, Whittaker AS (2006) Seismic performance of industrial facilities affected by the 1999 Turkey earthquake. J Perform of Constr Facil 20(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo G, Colombo A (2012) Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concr 13(2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullini N, Minghini F (2016) Grouted sleeve connections used in precast reinforced concrete construction - Experimental investigation of a column-to-column joint. Eng Struct 127:784–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008a) Seismic response of r.c. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: Monotonic tests. Eng Struct 30(9):2277–2288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008b) Seismic response of r.c. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part II: Cyclic tests. Eng Struct 30(9):2289–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q, Chen T, Xie Z (2018) Seismic experimental study on a precast concrete beam-column connection with grout sleeves. Eng Struct 155:330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanev P (1989) Performance of industrial facilities. Earthq Spectra 5(3):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying M, Jin-Xin G (2018) Seismic failure modes and deformation capacity of reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loads. Periodica Polytech Civ Eng 62(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Zhenggeng Z, Naito CJ, Weijian Y (2017) Tensile behavior of half grouted sleeve connections: experimental study and analytical modeling. Constr Build Mater 152:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng LX (1996) Grouted precast concrete column connections under reversed cyclic bending and compression. ACI Struct J 93(3):247–256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present investigation was developed in the framework of the Research Program FAR 2019 of the University of Ferrara. Moreover, the analyses were carried out within the activities of the (Italian) University Network of Seismic Engineering Laboratories–ReLUIS in the research program funded by the (Italian) National Civil Protection—Progetto Esecutivo 2019/21—WP2. The test specimen was provided by Prefabbricati Morri srl in Rimini, Italy. A special acknowledgement is due to Dr. Luisfilippo Lanza and Mr. Roberto Mazza for their contribution to the preparation of the experimental test, and to Dr. Massimo Vichi for the video editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nerio Tullini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 126084 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix reports the lap splice design (Table 6) and calculation of concrete properties due to confinement (Tables 7, 8). The confined concrete core characteristics are shown in Fig. 13.

Table 6 Design lap length for the longitudinal column reinforcement and transverse reinforcement requirements along the lap splice (CEN 2004a)
Table 7 Concrete core geometry and confinement effectiveness factor
Table 8 Computed properties for confined concrete. Subscripts ‘m’, ‘k’ and ‘d’ stand for mean, characteristic and design property, respectively
Fig. 13
figure 13

Evaluation of the post-peak bending resistance for the joint section: a stirrups arrangement and positions of engaged bars; b equilibrium condition for the calculation of confining stress σ on the compressed concrete core and c effective cross-section with strain and stress diagrams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tullini, N., Minghini, F. Cyclic test on a precast reinforced concrete column-to-foundation grouted duct connection. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 1657–1691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00766-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00766-2

Keywords

Navigation