Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shaking table tests of granite cladding with dowel pin connection

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Shaking table tests are conducted to investigate the seismic performance of new steel dowel-pinned granite claddings with two support systems. Standard and modified body anchors are used for installing the granite cladding system on opposite sides of a strong reinforced concrete tube fixed to the shaking table. One recorded ground motion (El Centro) and two artificial motions are applied as the input motions. The whole cladding system remained intact and almost no visible damage was observed for El Centro. However, the seismic responses of the cladding system under the effect of the artificial motions were larger. The dynamic response of the standard body anchors was larger than that of the modified ones. The maximum component amplification factors are larger than those specified in current code provisions. It is noted that the load bearing capacity of the body anchors determines the seismic performance of the global granite cladding system. Therefore, additional measures should be taken to guarantee the required seismic capacity of the stone cladding system by using the proposed steel dowel pin connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). AAMA 501.6-18 (2018) Recommended dynamic test method for determining the seismic drift causing glass fallout from window wall, curtain wall and storefront systems. AAMA, Schaumburg

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2017) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Silva WJ, Chiou BSJ, Wooddell KE, Graves RW, Kottke AR, Boore DM, Kishida T, Donahue JL (2013) PEER NGA-West2 Database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Report No. PEER 2013/03, Berkeley, CA

  • Arnold C (2016) Seismic safety of the building envelope. http://www.wbdg.org/resources/seismic-safety-building-envelope. Accessed 8 Jan 2017

  • Baird A, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2011) Façade damage assessment if multi-storey buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):368–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-rural Development (BMCHUD) (2007) Technical specification for application of stone in decoration. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pagani M, Riva P (2015) Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. J Perform Constr Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Torquati M, Marino A, Riva P (2016) Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 14(4):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standard Institution (BSI) (1994) Code of practice for design and installation of natural stone cladding and lining. BS 8298:1994, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau M, Reinhorn A (2006) Overview of the resilience concept, Paper No. 2040. In: Proceedings, 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering, 18–22 April, San Francisco, CA

  • Camposinhos RS (2014) Stone cladding engineering. Springer, New York, p 103

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Camposinhos RS, Camposinhos RPA (2009) Dimension-stone cladding design with dowel anchorage. Proc ICE Constr Mater 162(3):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Academy of Building Research (CABR) (2001) Technical code for metal and stone curtain walls engineering. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, p 27 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2016) Dynamics of structures, 5th edn. Pearson, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimellaro GP, Renschler C, Reinhorn AM, Arendt L (2016) PEOPLES: a framework for evaluating resilience. J Struct Eng 142(10):04016063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cladding Research Institute (CRI) (1995) Literature review on seismic performance of building cladding systems. National Institute of Standards, Report No. NIST HCR 95–681, 30 pp

  • European Committee for Standardization (ECS) (2005) Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 1–4: general rules—supplementary rules for stainless steels (EN 1993-1-4:2005). European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer MC, Lyons SP (2000) Stone cladding failure: the cause and consequences. Second Forensic Engineering Congress, pp 472–481, San Juan

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1—methodology (FEMA P-58-1). Washington, DC

  • Freedman S (ed) (2007) Architectural precast concrete. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI), Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodno BJ, Craig JI (1998) Ductile cladding connection systems for seismic design. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report No. NIST GCR 98-758, Gaithersburg

  • Goodno B, Craig J, Wolff AZ (1989) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985-behavior of heavy cladding components. Earthq Spectra 5(1):195–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günay S, Mosalam KM (2013) PEER performance based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited. J Earthq Eng 17(6):829–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Lu W (2019) Load bearing capacity testing of dowel pin anchorage in granite cladding. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Structures and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00059

  • Huang B, Chen S, Lu W, Mosalam KM (2017a) Seismic demand and experimental evaluation of the nonstructural building curtain wall: a review. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Tan J, Ilovar N, Wang X (2017b) Shaking table testing of stone façade support. Report No. 20170221, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil engineering (SLDRCE), Shanghai, China

  • Huang B, Lu W, Mosalam K (2018) Shaking table testing of granite cladding with undercut bolt anchorage. Eng Struct 171(2018):488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC-ES) (2010) Acceptance criteria for seismic qualification by shake-table testing of nonstructural components and systems. AC156, Whittier, CA

  • Ivorra S, Garcia-Barba J, Mateo M, Perez-Carraminana C, Macia A (2013) Partial collapse of a ventilated stone facade: diagnosis and analysis of the anchorage system. Eng Fail Anal 31:290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle FM, Bergman LA, Spanos PD (1988) Seismic floor response spectra for a combined system by Green’s function, NCEER 88-0011, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo

  • Liberatore L, Sorrentino L, Liberatore D, Decanini LD (2013) Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes. Eng Fail Anal 34(8):629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran P (2007) Failed stone. Birkhäuser, Boston, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Huang B, Mosalam KM, Chen S (2016) Experimental evaluation of a glass curtain wall of a tall building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45(1):1185–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Huang B, Chen S, Mosalam KM (2017) Acceleration demand of the outer-skin curtain wall system of the Shanghai Tower. Struct Des Tall Spec Build. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin K, Ortiz M, Patel L, Yarra S, Kishimoto T, Stewart C, Steed B (2012) Response of exterior precast concrete cladding panels in NEES-TIPS/NEESGC/E-Defense tests on a full scale 5-story building. In: Proceedings of structures congress 2012, Chicago, IL., USA, 1305–1314

  • Memari AM (2013) Curtain wall system: a primer. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD) (2016) Code for seismic design of buildings (GB 50011-2010). China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E (1999) Approximate seismic lateral deformation demands in multistory buildings. J Struct Eng 125(4):417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoli E (2016) Seismic behavior of architectural precast concrete cladding panels and connections. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego

  • Pantoli E, Hutchinson TC (2019) Seismic accelerations in architectural precast concrete cladding. Eng Struct 180:742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoli E, Hutchinson TC, McMullin KM, Underwood GA, Hildebrand MJ (2016) Seismic-drift-compatible design of architectural precast concrete cladding: tieback connections and corner joints. PCI J 61(4):38–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires V, Amaral PM, Rosa LG, Camposinhos RS (2011) Slate flexural and anchorage strength considerations in cladding design. Constr Build Mater 25(10):3966–3971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter KA, Ramer K (2012) Performance-based earthquake engineering method to estimate downtime in critical facilities, Paper No. 4504. In: Proceedings, 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, 24–28 September, 2012, Lisbon

  • Retamales R, Mosqueda G, Filiatrault A, Reinhorn A (2011) Testing protocol for experimental seismic qualification of distributed nonstructural systems. Earthq Spectra 27(3):835–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roik M, Piesker C (2017) A concept for fixing ‘heavy’ facades in seismic zones. Paper No. 266. In: Proceedings, 16th world conference on earthquake engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago Chile

  • Shanghai Association of Stone Materials (SASM) (2013) Technical code for application of stone in building decoration engineering (DG/TJ08-2134-2013). Tongji University, Shanghai (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Building Materials Industry Association (SBMIA) (2012) Technical code for building curtain wall (DGJ08-56-2012). Tongji University, Shanghai (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taly N (1988) The Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987—performance of building at California State University, Los Angeles. Earthq Spectra 4(2):277–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzarski J, Arnold C (2001) Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999 Reconnaissance Report. Earthquake Spectra, vol. 17 (sup.), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 82 pp

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grants # 51608381, 51578411, and 51578405), Ministration of Science and Technology (Grants # 2016YFE0105600, and 2018YFC0705701), and International Joint Research Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering (ILEE) (Grant # ILEE-IJRP-P2-P3-2017). The authors thank Dr. Roik, Mr. Isaac Li, and other team members of Halfen Co., for valuable test specimens.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 211800, China

    Baofeng Huang

  2. Department of Disaster Mitigation for Structures, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Wensheng Lu

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, USA

    Selim Günay

Authors
  1. Baofeng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wensheng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Selim Günay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wensheng Lu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, B., Lu, W. & Günay, S. Shaking table tests of granite cladding with dowel pin connection. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 1081–1105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00741-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00741-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation