Abstract
The non-smooth contact dynamics method was selected to investigate the damage occurred to typical masonry churches (namely Apennine churches) belonging to Central Italy areas affected by the seismic activity started in 2016. The investigated buildings show discontinuous dynamics since the optioned method gave the chance to properly model the temples as multi rigid body systems using the Signorini’s impenetrability condition and the dry-friction Coulomb’s law, achieving a thoughtful response to ground seismic solicitations. The results provided by the assessment grant an overview of the most common damages and failure mechanisms, giving the guidelines to restoration projects that fully respond to structural needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acito M, Chesi C, Milani G, Torri S (2016) Collapse analysis of the Clock and Fortified towers of Finale Emilia, Italy, after the 2012 Emilia Romagna seismic sequence: lesson learned and reconstruction hypotheses. Constr Build Mater 115:193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.220
Asteris PG, Sarhosis V, Mohebkhah A et al (2015) Numerical modeling of historic masonry structures. In: Asteris P, Plevris V (eds) Handbook of research on seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historic structures. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 213–256
Betti M, Galano L, Vignoli A (2014) Comparative analysis on the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Eng Struct 61:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.038
Betti M, Borghini A, Boschi S et al (2018) Comparative seismic risk assessment of basilica-type churches. J Earthq Eng 22:62–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309602
Brandonisio G, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A (2013) Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 34:693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021
Chetouane B, Dubois F, Vinches M, Bohatier C (2005) NSCD discrete element method for modelling masonry structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:65–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1358
Clementi F, Quagliarini E, Maracchini G, Lenci S (2015) Post-world war II Italian school buildings: typical and specific seismic vulnerabilities. J Build Eng 4:152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.09.008
Clementi F, Gazzani V, Poiani M, Lenci S (2016) Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling. J Build Eng 8:29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.09.005
Clementi F, Pierdicca A, Formisano A et al (2017a) Numerical model upgrading of a historical masonry building damaged during the 2016 Italian earthquakes: the case study of the Podestà palace in Montelupone (Italy). J Civ Struct Heal Monit 7:703–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0253-4
Clementi F, Quagliarini E, Monni F et al (2017b) Cultural heritage and earthquake: the case study of in Ascoli Piceno. Open Civ Eng J 11:1079–1105. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501711011079
Clementi F, Gazzani V, Poiani M et al (2018) Seismic assessment of a monumental building through nonlinear analyses of a 3D solid model. J Earthq Eng 22:35–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297268
Dubois F, Acary V, Jean M (2018) The contact dynamics method: a nonsmooth story. C R Mécanique 346:247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2017.12.009
Fiorentino G, Forte A, Pagano E et al (2018) Damage patterns in the town of Amatrice after August 24th 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 16:1399–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0254-z
Formisano A (2016) Theoretical and numerical seismic analysis of masonry building aggregates: case studies in San Pio Delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy). J Earthq Eng 21:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1172376
Formisano A, Marzo A (2017) Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building. Comput Struct 180:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.07.005
Formisano A, Ciccone G, Mele A (2017) Large scale seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation of a masonry churches sample in the historical centre of Naples. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering (ICCMSE 2017), Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012360
Formisano A, Vaiano G, Fabbrocino F, Milani G (2018) Seismic vulnerability of Italian masonry churches: the case of the Nativity of Blessed Virgin Mary in Stellata of Bondeno. J Build Eng 20:179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.017
Giordano E, Clementi F, Nespeca A, Lenci S (2019) Damage assessment by numerical modeling of Sant’Agostino’s sanctuary in Offida during the Central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. Front Built Environ 4:87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00087
Giresini L (2016) Energy-based method for identifying vulnerable macro-elements in historic masonry churches. Bull Earthq Eng 14:919–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9854-7
Giresini L, Sassu M (2017) Horizontally restrained rocking blocks: evaluation of the role of boundary conditions with static and dynamic approaches. Bull Earthq Eng 15:385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9967-7
Italian Department of Civil Protection (2017) 2016 Central Italy earthquake. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/terremoto_centro_italia_2016.wp. Accessed Feb 2019
Kadas K, Yakut A, Kazaz I (2011) Spectral ground motion intensity based on capacity and period elongation. J Struct Eng 137:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000084
Krstevska L, Tashkov L, Naumovski N, et al (2010) In-situ experimental testing of four historical buildings damaged during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. In: COST ACTION C26: urban habitat constructions under catastrophic events—proceedings of the final conference, pp 427–432
Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004) Damage and vulnerability assessment of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20:S271–S283. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1767161
Lancioni G, Lenci S, Piattoni Q, Quagliarini E (2013) Dynamics and failure mechanisms of ancient masonry churches subjected to seismic actions by using the NSCD method: the case of the medieval church of S. Maria in Portuno. Eng Struct 56:1527–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.027
Lancioni G, Gentilucci D, Quagliarini E, Lenci S (2016) Seismic vulnerability of ancient stone arches by using a numerical model based on the non-smooth contact dynamics method. Eng Struct 119:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.001
Lemos JV (2007) Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. Int J Archit Herit 1:190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050601176868
Milani G (2013) Lesson learned after the Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 20–29 May 2012 earthquakes: a limit analysis insight on three masonry churches. Eng Fail Anal 34:761–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.001
Milani G, Valente M (2015) Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches. Eng Fail Anal 54:13–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016
Milani G, Shehu R, Valente M (2017) Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches. Bull Earthq Eng 15:1707–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0043-0
Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici e dei Trasporti (2009) Circolare 2 febbraio 2009, n. 617 - Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni” di cui al Decreto Ministeriale del 14/01/2008 (in Italian)
Moreau JJ (1988) Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: Moreau JJ, Panagiotopoulos PD (eds) Nonsmooth mechanics and applications. Springer, Vienna, pp 1–82
Pantò B, Cannizzaro F, Caddemi S, Caliò I (2016) 3D macro-element modelling approach for seismic assessment of historical masonry churches. Adv Eng Softw 97:40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.02.009
Pierdicca A, Clementi F, Isidori D et al (2016) Numerical model upgrading of a historical masonry palace monitored with a wireless sensor network. Int J Mason Res Innov 1:74–99. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2016.074748
Quagliarini E, Maracchini G, Clementi F (2017) Uses and limits of the equivalent frame model on existing unreinforced masonry buildings for assessing their seismic risk: a review. J Build Eng 10:166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.004
Roca P, Cervera M, Pelà L et al (2013) Continuum FE models for the analysis of Mallorca Cathedral. Eng Struct 46:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.005
Sarhosis V, Milani G, Formisano A, Fabbrocino F (2018) Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers. Bull Earthq Eng 16:1511–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0258-8
Terracciano G, Di Lorenzo G, Formisano A, Landolfo R (2015) Cold-formed thin-walled steel structures as vertical addition and energetic retrofitting systems of existing masonry buildings. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 19:850–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.974832
Valente M, Milani G (2016) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108:74–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025
Valente M, Milani G (2018) Seismic response and damage patterns of masonry churches: seven case studies in Ferrara, Italy. Eng Struct 177:809–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.071
Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB (2009) Experimental characterization of stone masonry in shear and compression. Constr Build Mater 23:3337–3345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.045
Zuccaro G, Cacace F (2015) Seismic vulnerability assessment based on typological characteristics. The first level procedure “SAVE”. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.003
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio delle Marche and all the Municipalities for their valuable helps during the preparation of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clementi, F., Ferrante, A., Giordano, E. et al. Damage assessment of ancient masonry churches stroked by the Central Italy earthquakes of 2016 by the non-smooth contact dynamics method. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 455–486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00613-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00613-4