Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential of northeast Indian soil for non-linear effective stress analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive study of dynamic soil properties [namely, initial shear modulus-Gmax; normalized shear modulus reduction (G/Gmax); and damping ratio (D) variation curves] and pore water pressure parameters of a river bed sand (Brahmaputra sand), sampled from a highly active seismic region (northeast India). Two independent high quality apparatus (resonant column-RC and cyclic triaxial-CTX) are adopted in the study. Resonant column apparatus was used to obtain the small strain properties (up to 0.1%) while CTX equipment was adopted to obtain the high strain properties along with the pore water pressure parameters. The results obtained from both the equipment are combined to provide a comprehensive data of dynamic soil properties over wide range of strains. A modified hyperbolic formulation was suggested for efficient simulation of G/Gmax and D variations with shear strain. Based on the CTX results, a pore water pressure generation model is presented. Furthermore, a nonlinear effective stress ground response study incorporating the pore water pressure generation, is performed using the recorded earthquake motions of varying peak bed rock acceleration (PBRA) in the region, to demonstrate the applicability of proposed dynamic soil properties and pore pressure parameters. High amplification for low PBRA ground motions (< 0.10 g) was observed and attenuation of seismic waves was witnessed beyond a PBRA of 0.10 g near the surficial stratum due to the induced high strains and the resulting high hysteretic damping of the soil. Also, increased excess pore pressure generation with increased PBRA of the input motion was observed and the considered soil stratum is expected to liquefy beyond a PBRA of 0.1 g. The established properties can be handy to the design engineers during seismic design of structures in the northeast Indian region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D2487 (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM Stand Guid D5521–5:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D3999 (2003) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. Am Soc Test Mater 91:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3999-11E01.1.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4015 (2014) Standard test methods for modulus and damping of soils by resonant-column 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1520/d4015-07.1

  • ASTM D5311 (1996) Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. ASTM D5311(92):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayothiraman R, Raghu Kanth STG, Sreelatha S (2012) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of Guwahati: Gateway city to Northeastern India. Nat Hazards 63:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0158-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L (2011) Preloading effects on dynamic sand behavior by resonant column tests. Doctoral thesis, Technischen Universität Berlin

  • Basu D, Dey A, Kumar SS (2017) One-dimensional effective stress non-Masing nonlinear ground response analysis of IIT Guwahati. Int J Geotech Earthq Eng 8:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J Earthq Eng 8(spec01):43–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton BD (2014) An improved description of the seismic response of sites with high plasticity soils, organic clays, and deep soft soil deposits. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraj R, Sengupta A (2016) Liquefaction potential and strain dependent dynamic properties of Kasai River sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2016) Influences of local soil conditions for ground response in Kolkata city during earthquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A Phys Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-016-0265-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chehat A, Hussien MN, Abdelazize M, Chekired M (2018) Stiffness-and damping-strain curves of sensitive Champlain clays through experimental and analytical approaches. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, Onofrio A, Silvestri F, Park D (2015) Application of a simplified model for the prediction of pore pressure build-up in sandy soils subjected to seismic loading. In: 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Christchurch

  • Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2018) Development of a simplified model for pore water pressure build-up induced by cyclic loading. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0354-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung R, Yokel F, Drnevich V (1984) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sands by resonant column testing. Geotech Test J 7:60. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10594J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammala PK, Krishna AM, Bhattacharya S (2015) Cyclic threshold shear strains in cohesionless soils based on stiffness degradation. In: Indian geotechnical conference, Pune, Paper ID: 291

  • Dammala PK, Krishna AM, Bhattacharya S, Aingaran S (2016) Cyclic repones of cohesionless soil using cyclic simple shear testing. In: 6th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering. ICRAGEE, pp 1–10

  • Dammala PK, Bhattacharya S, Krishna AM, Kumar SS, Dasgupta K (2017a) Scenario based seismic re-qualification of caisson supported major bridges? a case study of Saraighat Bridge. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammala PK, Krishna AM, Bhattacharya S, Rouholamin M, Nikitas G (2017b) Dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies in Northeastern India. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli M (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping. Doctoral thesis, University of Texas

  • Desai SS, Choudhury D (2012) Site-specific seismic ground response study for nuclear power plants and ports in Mumbai. Nat Hazards Rev 13:205–220. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Pierce W, Dyvik R, Thomas GE, Ladd R (1985) Pore pressure model for cyclic straining of sand. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

    Google Scholar 

  • Drnevich VP, Hall JR, Richart Jr F (1967) Large amplitude vibration effects on the shear modulus of sand. Michigan University Ann Arbor

  • El Mohtar CS, Drnevich VP, Santagata M, Bobet A (2013) Combined resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests for measuring undrained shear modulus reduction of sand with plastic fines. Geotech Test J 36:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteva L (1988) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985-consequences, lessons, and impact on research and practise. Earthq Spectra 4:413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL, Bhatia SK (1982) Prediction of seismic pore water pressures. In: 10th international conference in soil mechanics and foundations, Stockholm, pp 201–206

  • Govindaraju L (2005) Liquefaction and dynamic properties of sandy soils. Doctoral thesis, IISc Bangalore

  • Guha S, Bhattacharya U (1984) Studies on prediction of seismicity in northeastern India. In: 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco

  • Hardin BO (1978) The nature of stress-strain behavior for soils. In: From Volume I of Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics--Proceedings of the ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Division Specialty Conference, June 19–21, 1978, Pasadena, California. Sponsored by Geotechnical Engineering Division of ASCE

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div SM7:667–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Richart FE (1963) Elastic wave velocities in Granular soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 89:33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Musgrouve MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, user manual. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

  • Heshmati AA, Shahnazari H, Sarbaz H (2015) The cyclic threshold shear strains in very dense clean sand. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 19:884–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.985848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu C-C, Vucetic M (2004) Volumetric threshold shear strain for cyclic settlement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:1(58)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 57–72

  • IS:1893 (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Indian Stand 1–44

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found Jpn Soc Soil Mech Found Eng 33:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivsic T (2006) A model for presentation of seismic pore water pressures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, De R (1991) Microseismicity and tectonics in Northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1999) Probabilities of occurrence of great earthquakes in the Himalaya. Proc Indian Acad Sci Earth Planet Sci 108:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiku H, Yoshida N (2000) Dynamic deformation property tests at large strains. World Conf Earthq Eng 12:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemeyer R, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div 99:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Harinarayan NH, Baro O (2015) High amplification factor for low amplitude ground motion: assessment for Delhi. Disaster Adv 8:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Baro O, Harinarayan NH (2016) Obtaining the surface PGA from site response analyses based on globally recorded ground motions and matching with the codal values. Nat Hazards 81:543–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2095-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2017) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 99:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2018) Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies. Int J Geotech Earthq Eng 9:1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGEE.2018010105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari BK, Kirar B (2017) Dynamic properties of soils at low strains in Roorkee region using resonant column tests. Int J Geotech Eng 6362:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1365474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1994) Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 119:1805–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1995) Generalized cyclic-degradation–pore-pressure generation model for clays. J Geotech Eng 121:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty P, Dutta SC, Bhattacharya S (2017) Proposed mechanism for mid-span failure of pile supported river bridges during seismic liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 102:41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85:67‒94

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham R (1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12 June 1897. Mem Geol Surv India 29:1–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliaroli A, Aprile V, Chamlagain D, Lanzo G, Poovarodom N (2018) Assessment of site e ff ects in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal, during the 2015 Mw 7. 8 Gorkha earthquake sequence using 1D and 2D numerical modelling. Eng Geol 239:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Hashash YMA (2008) Rate-dependent soil behavior in seismic site response analysis. Can Geotech J 45:454–469. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park T, Park D, Ahn JK (2015) Pore pressure model based on accumulated stress. Bull Earthq Eng 13(7):1913–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C, Hashash YMA (2009) Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PHRI Port and Harbour Research Institute (1997) Handbook on liquefaction remediation of reclaimed land, Balkema

  • Poddar M (1950) The Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950. Indian Miner 4:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth STG, Dash SK (2010) Evaluation of seismic soil-liquefaction at Guwahati city. Environ Earth Sci 61:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0347-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez J, Asce SM, Barrero AR, Chen L, Dashti S, Ghofrani A, Taiebat M, Arduino P (2018) Site response in a layered liquefiable deposit: evaluation of different numerical tools and methodologies with centrifuge experimental results. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero SM, Rix GJ (2005) Ground motion amplification of soils in the upper Mississippi embayment. Report no. GIT-CEE/GEO-01-1, National Science Foundation Mid America Earthquake Center

  • Saxena SK, Reddy KR (1989) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey No.0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found 29:37–51. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.2_37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EE 70-10, Earthquake Engineering and Research Center, University of Californina Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found Div 92:105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Martin PP, Lysmer J (1975) The generation and dissipation of pore water pressures during soil liquefaction. University of California Berkeley, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri F (2001). Looking for objective criteria in the interpretation of laboratory stress–strain tests. Pre-failure deformation characteristics of geometerials. Jamiolkowski, Lancellotta e Lo Presti (eds). Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 9058090752

  • Singhai A, Kumar SS, Dey A (2016) Site-specific 1-D nonlinear effective stress GRA with pore water pressure dissipation. In: 6th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, New Delhi, pp 1–11

  • Sitharam T, Govindaraju L, Srinivasa Murthy B (2004) Evaluation of liquefaction potential and dynamic properties of silty sand using cyclic triaxial testing. Geotech Test J 27:Paper ID GTJ11894

  • Stokoe KH, Hwang SK, Darendeli M, Lee NJ (1995) Correlation study of nonlinear dynamic soils properties. Westinghouse Savanah River Company, Aiken

    Google Scholar 

  • Towhata I (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vardanega PJ, Bolton MD (2013) Stiffness of clays and silts: normalizing shear modulus and shear strain. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 9:1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M (1995) Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 120:2208–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Cyclic triaxial strain-controlled testing of liquefiable sands. Adv Triaxial Test Soil Rock. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp29093s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 117:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Andrus RD, Juang CH (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India

    Pradeep Kumar Dammala & A. Murali Krishna

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, 751024, Odisha, India

    Shiv Shankar Kumar

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK

    Subhamoy Bhattacharya

Authors
  1. Pradeep Kumar Dammala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiv Shankar Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Murali Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Subhamoy Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Kumar Dammala.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dammala, P.K., Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M. et al. Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential of northeast Indian soil for non-linear effective stress analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 2899–2933 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00592-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00592-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation