1 Correction to: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00535-7
Unfortunately, Eqs. 2, 4 and 5 of the associated paper are published incorrectly. We apologize for these errors.
2 Equation 2
Instead of:
The likelihood that an arbitrary component is damaged at a level of demand that caused damage (\(edp_i\)) is the normal distribution probability density function (PDF) evaluated at the fragility function defined by Eq. 1, i.e.,
where \(\phi (.)\) is the normal distribution PDF.
Equation 2 should be:
The likelihood that an arbitrary component is damaged at a level of demand that caused damage (\(edp_i\)) is the fragility function defined by Eq. 1, i.e.,
3 Equation 4
Instead of:
Equation 4 should be:
4 Equation 5
Instead of:
Equation 5 should be:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cremen, G., Baker, J.W. Correction to: Improving FEMA P-58 non-structural component fragility functions and loss predictions. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 1961–1962 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00565-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00565-9