Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response spectrum analysis of frame structures: reliability-based comparison between complete quadratic combination and damping-adjusted combination

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In the framework of seismic design of structures, response spectrum analysis (RSA) is the most commonly used approach in practice. The most popular combination rule is the complete quadratic combination (CQC) which is also prescribed by the most of seismic design codes and is based on the assumptions that the seismic acceleration is a white noise process and the peak factor ratios associated to the total and modal responses are unitary. Recently, the damping adjusted combination (DAC) rule has been developed for base-isolated structures to overcome the aforementioned simplified assumptions. Although it has been proved that the simplifications about peak factors lead to noticeable errors in the case of base-isolated structures, the accuracy gain of DAC with respect to CQC in the case of fixed-base structures is still unknown. Therefore, the paper presents an in-depth study on the RSA of three-dimensional frame structures, aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the above methods. Two reference classes of frame structures having different degree of complexity are considered. Average interstorey drift and floor torsion responses, obtained from a set of Time History Analyses are compared with those of the modal combination rules. Lognormal joint probability density functions of the predictive errors from CQC and DAC are finally evaluated for a reliability assessment of the two combination rules under bidirectional seismic excitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basone F, Cavaleri L, Muscolino G, Di Trapani F (2017) Incremental dynamic based fragility assessment of reinforced concrete structures: stationary versus non-stationary artificial ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 103:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birely AC, Lowes L, Lehman D (2012) A model for the practical nonlinear analysis of reinforced-concrete frames including joint flexibility. Eng Struct 130:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciola P (2010) A stochastic approach for generating spectrum compatible fully nonstationary earthquakes. Comput Struct 88(15–16):889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciola P, Colajanni P, Muscolino G (2004) Combination of modal responses consistent with seismic input representation. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 130(1):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho G, Bento R, Bhatt C (2013) Nonlinear static and dynamics analyses of reinforced concrete buildings-comparison of different modelling approaches. Earthq Struct 4(5):451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Della Vecchia P (2015) Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct 95:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Della Vecchia P (2016) Life cycle-cost and seismic reliability analysis of 3D systems equipped with FPS for different isolation degrees. Eng Struct 125:349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Ferrentino T, Palazzo B (2017) Seismic reliability-based ductility demand evaluation for inelastic base-isolated structures with friction pendulum devices. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(8):1245–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F, Macaluso G, Papia M (2012) Reliability of code proposed models for assessment of masonry elastic moduli. Ing Sismica 29(1):38–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F, Asteris PG, Sarhosis V (2017) Influence of column shear failure on pushover based assessment of masonry infilled reinforced concrete framed structures: a case study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN, European Committee for Standardisation. Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, part 1.1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN 1998-1; 2003

  • CS.LL.PP. DM 14 Gennaio, Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana; 2008

  • Der Kiureghian A (1980) Structural response to stationary excitation. J Eng Mech Div 106(6):1195–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1981) A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9(5):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A, Nakamura Y (1993) CQC modal combination rule for high-frequency modes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22(11):943–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falsone G, Muscolino G (1999) Cross-correlation coefficients and modal combination rules for non-classically damped systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(12):1669–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YY, Chang KC (2003) A study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 129(2):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YY, Miranda E, Chang KC (2005) Evaluation of damping reduction factors for estimating elastic response of structures with high damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(11):1427–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menun C, Reyes JC, Chopra AK (2015) Errors caused by peak factor assumptions in response spectrum based analyses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(11):1729–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muscolino G, Palmeri A, Versaci C (2013) Damping-adjusted combination rule for the response spectrum analysis of base-isolated buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(2):163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmeri A (2006) Correlation coefficients for structures with viscoelastic dampers. Eng Struct 28(8):1197–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penzien J (1997) Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(8):849–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth E (1951) A basis for aseismic design. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois: Urbana, IL

  • Rosenblueth E, Elorduy J (1961) Responses of linear systems to certain transient disturbances. In: Proceedings of the 4th world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile

  • Shinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random process. J Eng Mech 93(1):11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1975) On the distribution of the first-passage time for normal stationary random processes. J Appl Mech 42(1):215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaverde R (1988) Rosenblueth’s modal combination rule for systems with non-classical damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16(3):931–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL, Der Kiureghian A, Bayo EP (1981) A replacement for the SRSS method for seismic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9(2):187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facoltà di Ingegneria ed Architettura, Università degli Studi di Enna “Kore”, Enna, Italy

    Francesco Basone

  2. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale, Edile e Geotecnica, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy

    Paolo Castaldo & Fabio Di Trapani

  3. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    Liborio Cavaleri

Authors
  1. Francesco Basone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paolo Castaldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liborio Cavaleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Di Trapani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Basone.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basone, F., Castaldo, P., Cavaleri, L. et al. Response spectrum analysis of frame structures: reliability-based comparison between complete quadratic combination and damping-adjusted combination. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 2687–2713 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00559-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00559-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation