Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic performance of bridges during the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes

  • S.I. : The 2016 central Italy Earthquakes
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the structural performance of existing masonry and reinforced concrete bridges which were surveyed in the aftermath of the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. Typical bridge vulnerabilities are first reviewed, as they provide a reference for the response of the bridges that were damaged by the 2016 earthquake swarm. Case studies are then discussed and preliminary numerical analyses are carried out to interpret the observed failure modes. In general, all surveyed masonry bridges experienced some extent of damage, particularly when built with poor-quality materials and subjected to geotechnical-induced effects. However, they offered a robust response in terms of collapse prevention. The majority of existing reinforced concrete bridges, although designed primarily for gravity loads, exhibited acceptable performance; however, local damage due to the poor maintenance of the structural systems was observed, which affected primarily the non-structural components of the bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Reproduced with permission from Kawashima et al. (2009)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Reproduced with permission from Kawashima et al. (2010)

Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Adapted from ANAS S.p.A., Condirezione Generale Tecnica Unità Ricerca e Innovazione (2010)

Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANAS S.p.A., Condirezione Generale Tecnica Unità Ricerca e Innovazione (2010) Executive Technical Report, 04 Nov 2010 (in Italian)

  • Abbiati G, Bursi OS, Caperan P, Di Sarno L, Molina FJ, Paolacci F, Pegon P (2015) Hybrid simulation of a multi-span RC viaduct with plain bars and sliding bearings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(13):2221–2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ, Wilson EL (1976) Numerical methods in finite element analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff. ISBN-10: 0136271901/ISBN-13: 9780136271901

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger E, Studer J (1981) Southern Italy Earthquake, November 23, 1980. Reconnaissance summary. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brencich A, De Francesco U (2004a) Assessment of multispan masonry arch bridges. I: simplified approach. J Bridge Eng 9(6):582–590. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(582)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brencich A, De Francesco U (2004b) Assessment of multispan masonry arch bridges. II: examples and applications. J Bridge Eng 9(6):591–598. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(591)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardone D (2014) Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(8):1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardone D, Perrone G, Sofia S (2011) A performance-based adaptive methodology for the seismic evaluation of multi-span simply supported deck bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 9(5):1463–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9260-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente P (1998) Introduction to dynamics of stone arches. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(5):513–522. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199805)27:5<513::AID-EQE740>3.0.CO;2-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computers and Structures, Inc. (2016) CSI analysis reference manual For SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge. ISO# GEN062708M1 Rev. 15. Berkeley, CA, USA

  • Cowan M (2011) R132 Kahu Road East-Bridge status summary report. http://resources.ccc.govt.nz/files/R132KahuRdEastBridge.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2014

  • da Porto F, Tecchio G, Zampieri P, Modena C, Prota A (2016) Simplified seismic assessment of railway masonry arch bridges by limit analysis. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(5):567–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1031141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca A, Giordano A, Mele E (2004) A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches. Eng Struct 26(13):1915–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Risi R, Di Sarno L, Paolacci F (2017) Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of an existing RC bridge with portal-frame piers designed for gravity loads only. Eng Struct 145:348–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Vecchio C, Kwon OS, Di Sarno L, Prota A (2015) Accuracy of nonlinear static procedures for the seismic assessment of shear critical structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(10):1581–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sarno L (2013) Effects of multiple earthquakes on inelastic structural response. Eng Struct 56:673–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sarno L, Del Vecchio C, Maddaloni G, Prota A (2017) Experimental response of an existing RC bridge with smooth bars and preliminary numerical simulations. Eng Struct 136:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (2009) The Mw 6.3 Abruzzo, Italy, Earthquake of April 6, 2009. https://www.eeri.org/site/images/eeri_newsletter/2009_pdf/LAquila-eq-report.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2018

  • Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Resemini S (2004) Non-linear seismic analysis of masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

  • Grossi P, Williams C, Cabrera C, Tabucchi T, Sarabandi P, Rodriguez A, Aslani H, Rahnama M (2011) The 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake: lessons and future challenges. Risk Management Solutions, Inc, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Q, Du XL, Liu JB, Li ZX, Li LY, Zhao JF (2009) Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(2):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8162-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman J (1966) The stone skeleton. Int J Solids Struct 2(2):249–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou I, Borg R, Novelli V, Melo J, Alexander D, Kongar I, Verrucci E, Cahill B, Rossetto T (2012) The 29th May 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake. EPICentre field observation report no. EPI-FO-290512. UCL EPICentre, University College London, London, UK

  • Kappos AJ, Saiidi MS, Aydınoğlu MN, Isaković T (eds) (2012) Seismic design and assessment of bridges—inelastic methods of analysis and case studies. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3943-7. ISBN-13: 978-94-007-3943-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima K, Takahashi Y, Ge H, Wu Z, Zhang J (2009) Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. J Earthq Eng 13(7):965–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902859169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima K, Aydan O, Aoki T, Kisimoto I, Konagai K, Matsui T, Sakuta J, Takahashi N, Teodori S, Yashima A (2010) Reconnaissance investigation on the damage of the 2009 L’Aquila, Central Italy earthquake. J Earthq Eng 14(6):817–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903584055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Puglia R, Russo E, ORFEUS WG5 (2016) Engineering Strong Motion Database, version 1.0. National Institute for Geophysics and Volcanology, Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology, Italy. https://doi.org/10.13127/esm

  • Ministry of Infrastructure (2008) Technical standards for constructions (DM 14.01.2008). Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • Ministry of Public Works (1992) Technical standards for the construction of reinforced and prestressed concrete and steel structures (DM 14.02.1992). Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • Modena C, Tecchio G, Pellegrino C, da Porto F, Donà M, Zampieri P, Zanini MA (2015) Reinforced concrete and masonry arch bridges in seismic areas: typical deficiencies and retrofitting strategies. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(4):415–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.951859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto PE, Mancini G (2009) Seismic assessment and retrofit of existing bridges. In: Manfredi G, Dolce M (eds) The State of Earthquake Engineering Research in Italy: the ReLUIS-DPC 2005–2008 Project, pp 111–140. Doppiavoce, Napoli, Italy. ISBN-13 9788889972427

  • Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley, New York. ISBN-10: 047157998X/ISBN-13: 9780471579984

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Paviay. ISBN-10: 8861980007/ISBN-13: 9788861980006

    Google Scholar 

  • ReLUIS-INGV Workgroup (2016) Preliminary study on strong motion data of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence V6. http://www.reluis.it. Accessed 12 July 2018

  • Resemini S, Lagomarsino S (2004) Vulnerabilità sismica dei ponti ferroviari ad arco in muratura. In: Proceedings of the 11th ANIDIS conference “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Genova, Italy, pp 25–29 (in Italian)

  • Rota M, Pecker A, Bolognini D, Pinho R (2005) A methodology for seismic vulnerability of masonry arch bridge walls. J Earthq Eng 9(Suppl 2):331–353. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MP, Khaleghi B, Saraf VK, Jain SK, Norris G (2002) Roads and bridges. In: Jain SK, Lettis WR, Murty CVR, Bardet JP (eds) Bhuj, India Earthquake of January 26, 2001, Reconnaissance report. Earthquake spectra, supplement A to vol. 18. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA, pp 363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Lanzo G, Aversa S, Bozzoni F, Chiabrando F, Grasso N, Di Pietra V, Dashti S, Di Sarno L, Durante MG, Foti S, Franke K, Reimschiissel B, Galadini F, Falcucci E, Gori S, Kayen RE, Mylonakis G, Katsiveli E, Pagliaroli A, Giallini S, Scasserra G, Santucci de Magistris F, Castiglia M, Sica S, Simonelli AL, Penna A, Mucciacciaro M, Silvestri F, D’Onofrio A, Chiaradonna A, De Silva F, Tommasi P, Zimmaro P (2016). Engineering reconnaissance following the 2016 M6.0 Central Italy Earthquake: Ver 1. Report no. GEER-050A. Geotechnical Extreme Event Reconnaissance Association, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.18118/g65k5w

  • Tecchio G, Donà M, da Porto F (2016) Seismic fragility curves of as-built single-span masonry arch bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 14(11):3099–3124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9931-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Han Q, Du X (2014) Seismic performance of circular RC bridge columns with flexure-torsion interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampieri P, Tecchio G, da Porto F, Modena C (2015) Limit analysis of transverse seismic capacity of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 13(5):1557–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9664-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Di Sarno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Sarno, L., da Porto, F., Guerrini, G. et al. Seismic performance of bridges during the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 5729–5761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0419-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0419-4

Keywords

Navigation