Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic response and energy dissipation of 3D complex steel buildings considering the influence of interior semi-rigid connections: low- medium- and high-rise

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical investigation regarding the seismic behavior of complex-3D steel buildings with perimeter moment resisting frames (PMRF) and interior gravity frames (GF) is conducted. The interior connections are assumed to be first perfectly pinned (PP) and then semi-rigid (SR); the two model responses are compared. Three steel building models representing low-, medium- and high-rise buildings, and several strong motions are used. The relative stiffness of SR connections is calculated according to the Richard Model and the Beam Line Theory. The Ruaumoko Computer Program is used to perform the required step-by-step nonlinear seismic analysis. Results indicate that interstory shears and interstory displacements at PMRF may be significantly reduced when interior connections are modeled as SR. Average reductions of up to 20, 46 and 11% are observed for interstory shears, for low-, medium-, and high-rise buildings, respectively. The corresponding reductions for interstory displacements are about 14, 44 and 15%. The contribution of GF to the lateral resistance is considerable, which significantly increases when the connections are modeled as SR; relative contributions larger than 80% are observed. The dissipated energy (DE) at PMRF is larger for the buildings with PP than for the buildings with SR connections indicating that damage at PMRF is reduced. Thus, the effect of the stiffness and the DE at interior connections should not be ignored. However, the design of some elements, particularly columns of the GF, has to be revised; these members may not be able to support the loads produced by the neglected lateral contribution if they are not properly designed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasiadis A, Mosoarca M, Gioncu V (2015) Investigation of the cyclic inelastic capacity of steel beams through the use of the plastic collapse mechanism. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1377–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black EF (2011) Use of stability coefficients for evaluating the p-Δ effect in regular moment resisting frames. Eng Struct 33:1205–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black EF (2012) Inelastic parameter estimates for regular steel moment-resisting frame. Eng Struct 34:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr A (2011) RUAUMOKO, inelastic dynamic analysis program. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Chen WF, Atsuta T (1971) Interaction equations for biaxially loaded sections. Fritz laboratory report (72-9), Lehigh University, Paper 284

  • Disque RO (1964) Wind connections with simple framing. Eng J 1(3):101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkady A, Lignos DM (2015) Analytical investigation of the cyclic behavior and plastic hinge formation in deep wide-flange steel beam-columns. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1097–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS, Elgazhouli AY (1994) Seismic behavior of semi-rigid steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 29:149–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS, Elgazhouli AY, Denesh-Ashtiani FA (1998) Response of semi-rigid steel frames to cyclic and earthquake loads. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(8):857–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2000) State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subjected to earthquake ground shaking. SAC Steel Project, Report FEMA 355C, Federal Emergency Management Agency, California

  • FEMA (2000) Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame building. SAC Steel Project, Report FEMA 350, Federal Emergency Management Agency, California

  • Flores FX, Charney FA, Lopez-Garcia D (2014) Influence of the gravity frame system on the collapse performance of special steel moment frames. J Constr Steel Res 101:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foutch A, Yun SY (2002) Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads. J Constr Steel Res 58:529–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholipour FM, Mojtahedi A, Nourani V (2015) Effect of semi-rigid connections in improvement of seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames. Steel Compos Struct 19(2):467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Krawinkler H (2000) Behavior of ductile SMRFs at various seismic hazard levels. J Struct Eng 126(1):98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone F, Latour M, Piluso V, Rizzano G (2011) Experimental analysis of bolted steel beam-to-column connections: component identification. J Earthq Eng 15(2):214–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaris GS, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2015) Direct damage controlled seismic design of plane steel degrading frames. Bull Earthq Eng 13:587–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishi N, Chen WF, Goto Y, Matsuoka KG (1993) Design aid of semi-rigid connections for frame analysis. Eng J AISC 30:90–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishi N, Chen WF, Goto Y, Hasan R (1996) Behavior of tall buildings with mixed use of rigid and semi-rigid connections. Comput Struct 61(6):1193–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan S, Ji C, Komatitsch D, Tromp J (2006) Performance of two 18-storey steel moment-frame building in southern California during two large simulated San Andres earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 22(4):1035–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour M, Piluso V, Rizzano G (2011) Cyclic modeling of bolted beam-to-column connections: component approach. J Earthq Eng 15(4):537–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Foutch DA (2001) Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Foutch DA (2006) Seismic evaluation of steel moment frames buildings designed using different R-values. J Struct Eng Div ASCE 132(9):1461–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon RT, Shin KJ (1995) Performance of semi-rigid frames. In: Proceedings of structures XIII congress ASCE, New York, USA, vol 1, pp 1020–1035

  • Liao KW, Wen YK, Foutch DA (2007) Evaluation of 3D steel moment frames under earthquake excitations I: modeling. J Struct Eng ASCE 133(3):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Astaneh-Asl A (2000) Cyclic tests on simple connections including effects of the slab. Report SAC/BD-00/03, SAC Joint Venture

  • López-Barraza A, Ruiz SE, Reyes-Salazar A, Bojórquez E (2016) Demands and distribution of hysteretic energy in moment resistant self-centering steel frames. Steel Compos Struct 20(5):1155–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macrae GA, Kimura Y, Roeder C (2004) Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior. J Struct Eng ASCE 130(3):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Málaga-Chuquitaype C, Elghazouli AY, Enache R (2016) Contribution of secondary frames to the mitigation of collapse in steel buildings subjected to extreme loads. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(1):45–60. http://www.tandfonline.com/author/Elghazouli%2C+Ahmed+Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele E, Di Sarno L, De Luca A (2004) Seismic behavior of perimeter and spatial steel frames. J Earthq Eng 8(3):457–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader MN, Astaneh-Asl A (1991) Dynamic behavior of flexible, semi-rigid and rigid frames. J Constr Steel Res 18:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PC, Kim SE (2014) Nonlinear inelastic time-history analysis of three-dimensional semi-rigid steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 101:192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PC, Kim SE (2015) Second-order spread-of-plasticity approach for nonlinear time-history analysis of space semi-rigid steel frames. Finite Elem Anal Des 105:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiee A, Talatahari S, Hadidi A (2013) Optimum design of steel frames with semi-rigid connections using big bang–big crunch method. Steel Compos Struct 14(5):431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentschler GP, Chen WF, Driscoll GC (1980) Tests of beam-to-column web moment connections. J Struct Div ASCE 106(5):1005–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A (1997) Inelastic seismic response and ductility evaluation of steel frames with fully, partially restrained and composite connections. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

  • Reyes-Salazar A (2002) Ductility and ductility reduction factors. Struct Eng Mech Int J 13(4):369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Haldar A (1999) Nonlinear seismic response of steel structures with semi-rigid and composite connections. J Constr Steel Res 51:37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Haldar A (2000) Dissipation of energy in steel frames with PR connections. Struct Eng Mech Int J 9(3):241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Haldar A (2001a) Energy dissipation at PR frames under seismic loading. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(5):588–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Haldar A (2001b) Seismic response and energy dissipation in partially restrained and fully restrained steel frames: an analytical study. Steel Compos Struct Int J 4:459–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Bojórquez E, Velazquez-Dimas JI, López-Barraza A, Rivera-Salas JL (2015) Ductility and ductility reduction factors for steel buildings considering different structural representations. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1749–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Salazar A, Llanes-Tizoc MD, Bojórquez J, Bojórquez E, Lopez-Barraza A, Haldar A (2016) Force reduction factors for steel buildings with welded and post-tensioned connections. Bull Earthq Eng 14:2827–2858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard RM (1993) Moment-rotation curves for partially restrained connections. RMR Des Group, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard RM, Abbott BJ (1975) Versatile elastic plastic stress–strain formula. J Eng Mech ASCE 101(4):511–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricles JM, Sause R, Garlock M, Zhao C (2001) Post-tensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(2):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan R, Sullivan TJ, Della Corte G (2016) Displacement-based design of steel moment resisting frames with partially-restrained beam-to-column joints. Bull Earthq Eng 14:1017–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagiroglu M, Aydin AC (2015) Design and analysis of non-linear space frames with Semi-rigid connections. Steel Compos Struct 18(6):1405–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Astaneh-Asl A (1999) Hysteretic behavior of bolted angle connections. J Constr Steel Res 51:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Astaneh-Asl A (2000) Hysteretic model of bolted-angle connections. J Constr Steel Res 54:317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagawa H, Macrae GA, Lowes L (2010) Continuous column effects of gravity columns in U.S. steel moment-resisting frame structures: continuous column effects in steel moment frames in perspective of dynamic stability part 2. J Struct Constr Eng 75:761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente M, Castiglioni CA, Kanyilmaz A (2016) Dissipative devices for earthquake resistant composite steel structures: bolted versus welded solution. Bull Earthq Eng 14:3613–3639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour HR, Bradford MA (2013) Nonlinear P-Δ analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Steel Compos Struct 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JG, Jeon SS (2009) Analytical model for the initial stiffness and plastic moment capacity of an unstiffened top and seat connection under a shear load. Int J Steel Struct 9(3):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaghi AE, Soroushian S, Itani A, Maragakis EM, Pekcan G, Mehrraoufi M (2015) Impact of column-to-beam strength ratio on the seismic response of steel MRFs. Bull Earthq Eng 13:635–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on work supported by La Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa under Grant PROFAPI 2015/157 and by El Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) under grant 50298-J. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Reyes-Salazar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reyes-Salazar, A., Sauceda-Pimentel, J.M., Ruiz, S.E. et al. Seismic response and energy dissipation of 3D complex steel buildings considering the influence of interior semi-rigid connections: low- medium- and high-rise. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 5557–5590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0405-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0405-x

Keywords

Navigation