Advertisement

Effects of uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track–bridge system of high-speed railway

Original Research Paper
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The high-speed railway in China has to pass through the site surrounded by several known faults. Different earthquake mechanics of those faults and propagation paths cause different ground motions, including different peak ground accelerations (PGA), durations and characteristic periods, acting on the high-speed railway bridges. However, the previous seismic vulnerability analysis mainly aimed at the influence of PGA instead of characteristic periods on the seismic fragilities of bridge structure rather than track–bridge system. By taking a typical and common continuous bridge recommended in Chinese criterion as example, the effects of the uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions on the seismic responses and fragilities of track–bridge system were analyzed based on a numerical method. The results indicate that the probabilities exceeding any damage state of most components, including the bridge and track parts, increase with the characteristic period of ground motions. The uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions should be fully considered for the seismic design of track–bridge system, especially when the uncertain characteristic periods change around a small value. In the seismic vulnerability analysis, the uncertain of the designed characteristic period of ground motions should be developed by considering the different earthquake mechanics of several known faults surrounding the bridge site and the complex propagation paths of ground motion waves through different soils. Using a constant characteristic period of ground motions only considering the soil profile at the local site of bridge possibly leads to an unsafe result in the current criterion.

Keywords

High-speed railway Continuous bridges CRTS II track Ground motions Characteristic periods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China under Grant Nos. 51778635 and 51778630, the Natural Science Foundations of Hunan Province under Grant No. 2015JJ3159, the Innovation-driven Plan in Central South University under Grant No. 2015CX006, and the Experimental Foundations of Seismic Comprehensive Test for Railway Bridge Piers in High Intensity Earthquake Area from Chengdu to Lanzhou under Grant No. CLRQT-2015-010. The above support is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J Earthq Eng 8(1):43–91Google Scholar
  2. Chen L, Jiang L, Guo W, Liu W, Zeng Z, Chen G (2014) The seismic response of high-speed railway bridges subjected to near-fault forward directivity ground motions using a vehicle-track–bridge element. Shock Vib 2014:1–17Google Scholar
  3. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng ASCE 128(4):526–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai GL, Liu WS (2013) Applicability of small resistance fastener on long-span continuous bridges of high-speed railway. J Central South Univ 20(5):1426–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du XT, Xu YL, Xia H (2012) Dynamic interaction of bridge–train system under non-uniform seismic ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct D 41(1):139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. He XH, Wu T, Zou YF, Chen YF, Guo H, Yu ZW (2017) Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China. Struct Infrastruct Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1304429 Google Scholar
  7. Hwang HHMJ (2014) Evaluation of seismic damage to memphis bridges and highway systems. J Bridge Eng 5(4):322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang CW, Wei B, Wang DB, Jiang LZ, He XH (2017) Seismic vulnerability evaluation of a three-span continuous beam railway bridge. Math Probl Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3468076 Google Scholar
  9. Karim KR, Yamazaki F (2001) Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation. Earthq Eng Struct D 30(12):1839–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karim KR, Yamazaki F (2003) A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges. Earthq Eng Struct D 32(10):1603–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kowalsky MJ (2002) A displacement-based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges. Earthq Eng Struct D 31(3):719–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lu CF, He HW, Zheng J, An GD, Zhao GT (2014) Code for design of high speed railway. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Ni Choine M, O’Connor AJ, Padgett JE (2015) Comparison between the seismic performance of integral and jointed concrete bridges. J Earthq Eng 19(1):172–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct D 36(6):823–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2008) Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthq Eng Struct D 37(8):1157–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Park Y, Ang A (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 4(111):722–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramadan OMO, Mehanny SSF, Elhowary HA (2015) Seismic vulnerability of box girder continuous bridges under spatially variable ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1727–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Kim SH (2000a) Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12):1287–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000b) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12):1224–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tang GW, Li JZ, Tao XX (2008) Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  21. Taskari O, Sextos A (2015) Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct D 44(13):2281–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct D 31(3):491–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2005) Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthq Eng Struct D 34(13):1573–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang G (2011) A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(4):611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang ZH, Liu JR, Lei HF, Shen P (2005) Code for design on reinforced and prestressed concrete structure of railway bridge and culvert. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei B, Yang TH, Jiang LZ, He XH (2017) Effects of friction-based fixed bearings on the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Adv Struct Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217726894 Google Scholar
  27. Xu ZZ, Ni YP, Gao ZW (2009) Code for seismic design of railway engineering. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan B, Dai GL, Hu N (2015) Recent development of design and construction of short span high-speed railway bridges in China. Eng Struct 100:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yan B, Liu S, Pu H, Dai GL, Cai XP (2017) Elastic–plastic seismic response of CRTS II slab ballastless track system on high-speed railway bridges. Sci China Technol Sci 60(6):865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang CW, Werner SD, DesRoches R (2015) Seismic vulnerability analysis of skewed bridges in the central southeastern United States. Eng Struct 83:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zang XQ, Song SC, Jin FH (2013) Spherical bearings for railway bridges. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeng Z, Zhao Y, Xu W, Yu Z, Chen L, Lou P (2015) Random vibration analysis of train–bridge under track irregularities and traveling seismic waves using train–slab track–bridge interaction model. J Sound Vib 342:22–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao Y, Tong G (2009) An investigation of characteristic periods of seismic ground motions. J Earthq Eng 13(PII 9109148804):540–565Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway ConstructionChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations