Abstract
This paper presents an investigation into the residual ground displacements recorded on a strong motion network during the Mw 6.0 24 August 2016 Amatrice, Italy earthquake. The available accelerometric data from near field recording stations are processed using two different techniques to remove baseline offsets and retain the low frequency signal which depends on residual displacement. The first method uses acausal filtering to identify and retain a dominant pulse while the second method uses linear regression to remove velocity or displacement baseline trends. The results are compared to high-rate (1 and 10 Hz) global positing system (GPS) displacement waveforms, consensus GPS displacement offsets and crustal deformations detected by interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) satellite imaging. Since the GPS sensors are not all collocated with the accelerometers, the InSAR data is used for stations where no GPS results are available, or when the nearest GPS is far. It is shown that both methods investigated in this paper provide displacement waveforms with features matching those of the high-rate GPS. In addition, the residual displacement magnitudes are in good agreement with the consensus and InSAR displacements. The acceleration time series for the stations considered in this work are provided as an electronic supplement with this paper.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig12_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig13_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig14_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig15_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig16_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig17_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10518-017-0273-9/MediaObjects/10518_2017_273_Fig18_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkar S, Boore DM (2009) On baseline corrections and uncertainty in response spectra for baseline variations commonly encountered in digital accelerograph records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2009(99):1671–1690
Avallone A, Latorre D, Serpelloni E, Cavaliere A, Herrero A, Cecere G, D’Agostino N, D’Ambrosio C, Devoti R, Giuliani R, Mattone M, Calcaterra S, Gambino P, Abruzzese L, Cardinale V, Castagnozzi A, De Luca G, Falco L, Memmolo A, Migliari F, Minichiello F, Moschillo R, Massucci A, Zarrili L, Selvaggi G (2016) Coseismic displacement waveforms for the 2016 August 24 Mw 6.0 Amatrice earthquake (central Italy) carried out from High-Rate GPS data. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7275
Boore DM (2001) Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi–Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2001(91):1199–1211
Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences, Soil Dynam. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115
Boore DM, Sisi AA, Akkar S (2012) Using pad-stripped acausally filtered strong-motion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:751–760
Chanerley AA, Alexander NA, Halldorsson B (2009) On fling and baseline correction using quadrature mirror filters. In: Topping BHV, Costa Neves LF, Barros RC (eds) Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing. Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, Paper 177. Doi:https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.91.177
Chao WA, Wu YM, Zhao L (2010) An automatic scheme for baseline correction of strong-motion records in coseismic displacement determination. J. Seismol 14:495–504
Cheloni D, Serpelloni E, Devoti R, D’Agostino N, Pietrantonio G, Riguzzi F, Anzidei M, Avallone A, Cavaliere A, Cecere G, D’Ambrosio C, Esposito A, Falco L, Galvani A, Selvaggi G, Sepe V, Calcaterra S, Giuliani R, Mattone M, Gambino P, Abruzzese L, Cardinale V, Castagnozzi A, De Luca G, Massucci A, Memmolo A, Migliari F, Minichiello F, Zarrilli L (2016) GPS observations of coseismic deformation following the 2016, August 24, Mw 6 Amatrice earthquake (central Italy): data, analysis and preliminary fault model. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7269
Chiaraluce L, Di Stefano R, Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michele M, Casarotti E, Cattaneo M, De Gori P, Chiarabba C, Monachesi G et al (2017) The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol Res Lett 88(3):757–771. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160221
ESA (2017) “InSARap Project” http://insarap.org/. Last accessed 2 March 2017
Fiorentino G, Forte A, Pagano E et al (2017) Damage patterns in the town of Amatrice after August 24th 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0254-z
Graizer VM (1979) Determination of the true ground displacement by using strong motion records. Phys Solid Earth 15:875–885
Graizer VM (2010) Strong motion recordings and residual displacements: what are we actually recording in strong motion seismology? Seismol Res Lett 81:635–639
GSI (2016) “The August 2016 Central Italy Earthquake: Crustal deformation detected by ALOS-2 data” http://www.gsi.go.jp/cais/topic160826-index-e.html Last accessed 2 March 2017
INGV (2017). “Earthquake with magnitude of Mw 6.0 on date 24-08-2016.” http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/en/event/7073641. Last accessed 31 Oct 2017
INGV Working group “GPS Geodesy (GPS data and data analysis center)” (2016) Preliminary co-seismic displacements for the August 24, 2016 ML6, Amatrice (central Italy) earthquake from the analysis of continuous GPS stations. Zenodo. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61355
Iwan WD, Chen X (1994) Important near-field ground motion data from the Landers earthquake. In: Proceedings of the tenth European conference on earthquake engineering. Vienna, Austria
Iwan WD, Moser MA, Peng C-Y (1985) Some observations on strong-motion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1225–1246
Lanzano G, Luzi L, Pacor F, Puglia R, D’Amico M, Felicetta C, Russo E (2016) Preliminary analysis of the accelerometric recordings of the August 24th, 2016 MW 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7201
Luzi L, Puglia R, Russo E, ORFEUS WG5 (2016) Engineering Strong Motion Database, version 1.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology. doi:https://doi.org/10.13127/ESM
Luzi L, Pacor F, Puglia R, Lanzano G et al (2017) The Central Italy seismic sequence between August and December 2016: analysis of strong-motion observations. Seismol Res Lett 88(5):1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170037
Makris N, Chang S (2000) Response of damped oscillators to cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:2(123)
Marinkovic P, Larsen Y (2016) Mapping and analysis of the Central Italy Earthquake (2016) with Sentinel-1 A/B interferometry. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61133
Michele M, Di Stefano R, Chiaraluce L, Cattaneo M, De Gori P, Monachesi G, Latorre D, Marzorati S, Valoroso L, Ladina C, Chiarabba C, Lauciani V, Fares M (2016) The Amatrice 2016 seismic sequence: a preliminary look at the mainshock and aftershocks distribution. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7227
Pacor F, Paolucci R, Ameri G, Massa M, Puglia R (2011) Italian strong motion in ITACA: overview and record processing. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9295-x
Paolucci R, Pacor F, Puglia R, Ameri G, Cauzzi C, Massa M (2011) The Italian CMT dataset from 1977 to the present. In: Akkar S (ed) Earthquake data in engineering seismology, chapter 8, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering series, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–113
Pischiutta M, Akinci A, Malagnini L, Herrero A (2016) Characteristics of the strong ground motion from the 24th August 2016 Amatrice earthquake. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7219
ReLUIS-INGV Workgroup (2016) Preliminary study on strong motion data of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence V6, available at http://www.reluis.it. Last accessed 20 Feb 2017
Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjornsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 8:787–811
Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michelini A, Cocco M (2016) Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys Res Lett 43:10745–10752. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071263
Trifunac MD (1971) Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61:1201–1211
Wu YM, Wu CF (2007) Approximate recovery of coseismic deformation from Taiwan strong-motion records. J Seismol 11:159–170
Yang S, Mavroeidis GP, Ucak A, Tsopelas P (2017) Effect of ground motion filtering on the dynamic response of a seismically isolated bridge with and without fault crossing considerations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:183–191, ISSN 0267-7261. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
The electronic supplement to this paper contains the acceleration time series for the SMA stations based on Method 1. They may be freely utilized by the reader provided proper citation is given.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitney, R. Approximate recovery of residual displacement from the strong motion recordings of the 24 August 2016 Amatrice, Italy earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 1847–1868 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0273-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0273-9