Abstract
Rapid and reliable estimation of earthquake magnitude has a significant effect on proper performance of earthquake early warning system. In recent years, three methods including predominant period \((\tau_{p}^{max} )\), characteristic period \(\left( {\tau_{c} } \right)\), and log-average period \((\tau_{\log } )\) have been introduced for estimation of earthquake size based on frequency contents within the first few seconds of P-waves. In the current study, new power-spectrum parameter, \(\tau_{ps}\) in the modified form of \(\tau_{\log }\) approach, is introduced by using waveforms of 70 earthquakes occurred in Japan with magnitudes ranging between M JMA 3.0 and 8.0. Results demonstrate that \(\tau_{ps}\) values have no significant weighted dependency on amplitude and frequency contents, and are better correlated with the reported magnitudes compared to other frequency-based proxies. It is also shown that \(\tau_{ps}\) and \(\tau_{p}^{max}\) magnitude-scaling relationships provide more precise and robust event size estimation than \(\tau_{c}\) and \(\tau_{\log }\) approaches, especially for small events. Thus, by using \(\tau_{ps}\) parameter it has been expected that performance of earthquake early warning systems (EEWS) will improve by reducing the rate of false alarms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcik H, Ozel O, Apaydin N, Erdik M (2009) A study on warning algorithms for Istanbul earthquake early warning system. Geophys Res Lett 36:L00B05
Allen RM, Kanamori H (2003) The potential for earthquake early warning in Southern California. Science 300:786–789
Allen R, Brown MH, Hellweg M, Khainovski O, Lombard P, Neuhauser D (2009) Real-time earthquake detection and hazard assessment by ElarmS across California. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036766
Bose M, Lonescu C, Wenzel F (2007) Earthquake early warning for Buchatest, Romania: novel and revised scaling relations. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029396
Colombelli S, Zollo A (2012) Early magnitude and potential damage zone estimates for the great Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 39:L22306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053923
Espinosa-Aranda JM, Jimenez A, Ibarrola G, Alcantar F, Aguilar A (1995) MEXICO City seismic alert system. Seismol Res Lett 66:42–53
Heidari R, Shomali ZH, Ghayamghamian MR (2013) Magnitude-scaling relations using period parameters τc and τ maxp , for Tehran region, Iran. Geophys J Int 192:275–284
Hoshiba M, Iwakiri K (2011) Initial 30 seconds of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0)-Amplitude and Tc for magnitude estimation for earthquake early warning. Earth Planet Space 63:553–557. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.015
Hoshiba M, Kamigaichi O, Saito M, Tsukada S, Hamada N (2008) Earthquake early warning starts nationwide in Japan. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 89:73–74
Hsiao NC, Wu Y, Shin M, Zhao TC, Teng L, Teng TL (2009) Development of earthquake early warning system in Taiwan. Geophys Res Lett 36:L00B02
Kamigaichi O, Saito M, Doi K, Matsumori T, Tsukada S, Takeda K, Shimoyama T, Nakamura K, Kiyomoto M, Watanabe Y (2009) Earthquake early warning in Japan: warning the general public and future prospects. Seismol Res Lett 80:717–726
Kanamori H (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:195–214
Kuyuk HS, Allen RM (2013) A global approach to provide magnitude estimates for earthquake early warning alerts. Geophys Res Lett 40:6329–6333
Lior I, Ziv A, Madariaga R (2016) P-wave attenuation with implications for earthgquake early warning. Seism Soc Am, Bull. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150087
Meng LS, Inbal A, Ampuero JP (2011) A window into the complexity of the dynamic rupture of the 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 38:4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048118
Nakamura H, Horiuchi S, Wu C, Yamamoto S, Rydelek PA (2009) Evaluation of the real-time earthquake information system in Japan. Geophys Res Lett 36:1
Olson EL, Allen RM (2005) The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture. Nature 438:212–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04214
Olson EL, Allen RM (2006) Is earthquake rupture deterministic? (Reply). Nature 442:E6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04964
Rydelek P, Horiuchi S (2006) Earth science: Is earthquake rupture deterministic? Nature 442:E5–E6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04963
Shieh JT, Wu YM, Allen RM (2008) A comparison of τc and τ maxp for magnitude estimation in earthquak earthquake early warning. J Geophys Res 35:L20301
Wolfe CJ (2006) On the properties of predominant-period estimators for earthquake early warning. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(5):1961–1965
Wu YM, Kanamori H (2005) Rapid assessment of damage potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from the begining of the P wave. Bull Seism Soc Am 95(3):1181–1185
Wu YM, Kanamori H (2008) Development of an earthquake early warning system using real-time strong motion signals. Sensors 8:1–9
Ziv A (2014) New frequency-based realtime magnitude proxy for earthquake early warning. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061564
Zollo A, Lancieri M, Nielsen S (2006) Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23312
Acknowledgements
The understudy waveforms and parametric data are obtained from KiK-net and K-net on-line databases. Figures are prepared using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998; last accessed March 2015), and data processing is performed using Seismic Analysis Code (https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/software/downloads/ sac, last accessed July 2013). I am grateful to Dr. N. Mirzaei for his constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heidari, R. \(\varvec{\tau}_{ps}\), a new magnitude scaling parameter for earthquake early warning. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 1165–1177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0256-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0256-x