Skip to main content
Log in

\(\varvec{\tau}_{ps}\), a new magnitude scaling parameter for earthquake early warning

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid and reliable estimation of earthquake magnitude has a significant effect on proper performance of earthquake early warning system. In recent years, three methods including predominant period \((\tau_{p}^{max} )\), characteristic period \(\left( {\tau_{c} } \right)\), and log-average period \((\tau_{\log } )\) have been introduced for estimation of earthquake size based on frequency contents within the first few seconds of P-waves. In the current study, new power-spectrum parameter, \(\tau_{ps}\) in the modified form of \(\tau_{\log }\) approach, is introduced by using waveforms of 70 earthquakes occurred in Japan with magnitudes ranging between M JMA 3.0 and 8.0. Results demonstrate that \(\tau_{ps}\) values have no significant weighted dependency on amplitude and frequency contents, and are better correlated with the reported magnitudes compared to other frequency-based proxies. It is also shown that \(\tau_{ps}\) and \(\tau_{p}^{max}\) magnitude-scaling relationships provide more precise and robust event size estimation than \(\tau_{c}\) and \(\tau_{\log }\) approaches, especially for small events. Thus, by using \(\tau_{ps}\) parameter it has been expected that performance of earthquake early warning systems (EEWS) will improve by reducing the rate of false alarms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcik H, Ozel O, Apaydin N, Erdik M (2009) A study on warning algorithms for Istanbul earthquake early warning system. Geophys Res Lett 36:L00B05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Kanamori H (2003) The potential for earthquake early warning in Southern California. Science 300:786–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R, Brown MH, Hellweg M, Khainovski O, Lombard P, Neuhauser D (2009) Real-time earthquake detection and hazard assessment by ElarmS across California. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036766

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose M, Lonescu C, Wenzel F (2007) Earthquake early warning for Buchatest, Romania: novel and revised scaling relations. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029396

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli S, Zollo A (2012) Early magnitude and potential damage zone estimates for the great Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 39:L22306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Aranda JM, Jimenez A, Ibarrola G, Alcantar F, Aguilar A (1995) MEXICO City seismic alert system. Seismol Res Lett 66:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari R, Shomali ZH, Ghayamghamian MR (2013) Magnitude-scaling relations using period parameters τc and τ maxp , for Tehran region, Iran. Geophys J Int 192:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshiba M, Iwakiri K (2011) Initial 30 seconds of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0)-Amplitude and Tc for magnitude estimation for earthquake early warning. Earth Planet Space 63:553–557. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshiba M, Kamigaichi O, Saito M, Tsukada S, Hamada N (2008) Earthquake early warning starts nationwide in Japan. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 89:73–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao NC, Wu Y, Shin M, Zhao TC, Teng L, Teng TL (2009) Development of earthquake early warning system in Taiwan. Geophys Res Lett 36:L00B02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamigaichi O, Saito M, Doi K, Matsumori T, Tsukada S, Takeda K, Shimoyama T, Nakamura K, Kiyomoto M, Watanabe Y (2009) Earthquake early warning in Japan: warning the general public and future prospects. Seismol Res Lett 80:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyuk HS, Allen RM (2013) A global approach to provide magnitude estimates for earthquake early warning alerts. Geophys Res Lett 40:6329–6333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lior I, Ziv A, Madariaga R (2016) P-wave attenuation with implications for earthgquake early warning. Seism Soc Am, Bull. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150087

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng LS, Inbal A, Ampuero JP (2011) A window into the complexity of the dynamic rupture of the 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 38:4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura H, Horiuchi S, Wu C, Yamamoto S, Rydelek PA (2009) Evaluation of the real-time earthquake information system in Japan. Geophys Res Lett 36:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson EL, Allen RM (2005) The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture. Nature 438:212–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson EL, Allen RM (2006) Is earthquake rupture deterministic? (Reply). Nature 442:E6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydelek P, Horiuchi S (2006) Earth science: Is earthquake rupture deterministic? Nature 442:E5–E6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh JT, Wu YM, Allen RM (2008) A comparison of τc and τ maxp for magnitude estimation in earthquak earthquake early warning. J Geophys Res 35:L20301

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe CJ (2006) On the properties of predominant-period estimators for earthquake early warning. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(5):1961–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YM, Kanamori H (2005) Rapid assessment of damage potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from the begining of the P wave. Bull Seism Soc Am 95(3):1181–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YM, Kanamori H (2008) Development of an earthquake early warning system using real-time strong motion signals. Sensors 8:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv A (2014) New frequency-based realtime magnitude proxy for earthquake early warning. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061564

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo A, Lancieri M, Nielsen S (2006) Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The understudy waveforms and parametric data are obtained from KiK-net and K-net on-line databases. Figures are prepared using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998; last accessed March 2015), and data processing is performed using Seismic Analysis Code (https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/software/downloads/ sac, last accessed July 2013). I am grateful to Dr. N. Mirzaei for his constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Heidari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heidari, R. \(\varvec{\tau}_{ps}\), a new magnitude scaling parameter for earthquake early warning. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 1165–1177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0256-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0256-x

Keywords

Navigation