Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of a flexible wall retaining EPS composite soil

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of shaking table tests were designed and conducted to study the seismic performance of an inverted T-shape cantilever retaining wall with an anti-sliding tooth at the base using EPS composite soil as backfills. For comparison, the same wall model retaining Nanjing fine sand was simultaneously excited. The macro phenomena and seismic behaviors of two wall–soil systems are depicted in detail and analyzed. The displacement mode of the non-sliding flexible retaining wall and distribution characteristics of dynamic earth pressure acting on the wall back retaining two types of backfills are emphasized. The testing results show that, as a kind of backfill, Nanjing fine sand has a greater peak ground acceleration (PGA) than EPS composite soil under the kinematic interaction between wall and soil, while the difference in the inertial force of the retaining wall itself is not obvious. As the input peak base acceleration increases, Nanjing fine sand which possesses the compaction strength gradually transforms from the global shearing deformation to the wedge sliding deformation, while EPS composite soil with a cemented strength exhibits the block shearing deformation mode under all excitations. The tested retaining walls with the rotation displacement are non-sliding flexible walls. The dynamic deformation mode of backfills is closely related to the inertial interaction between wall and soil, which results in a significant difference in the dynamic earth pressure increment distribution between the walls retaining two types of backfills. The dynamic earth thrust in the retaining wall-Nanjing fine sand system (WSS) has a nonlinear relation with PGA, and the action position approximated 2/3 wall height. A linear relation is more suitable for retaining EPS composite soil and the corresponding action position is about 1/3 wall height. The retaining wall-EPS composite soil system is shown to have a better seismic performance in contrast to WSS. The Seed and Whitman method with 100% PGA is recommended to predict the dynamic earth thrust on the wall retaining EPS composite soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Atik L, Sitar N (2010) Seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(10):1324–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alampalli S, Elgamal A (1990) Dynamic response of retaining walls including supported soil backfill: a computational model. In: The fourth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, vol 3. Palm Springs, CA, pp 623–632

  • Anastasopoulos I, Georgarakos T, Georgiannou V et al (2010) Seismic performance of bar-mat reinforced-soil retaining wall: shaking table testing versus numerical analysis with modified kinematic hardening constitutive model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(10):1089–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias A, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Ovando-Shelley E (1981) A simplified elastic model for seismic analysis of earth-retaining structures with limited displacements. In: Proceedings of the international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. St Louis, MO, pp 235–240

  • Biondi G, Cascone E, Maugeri M (2014) Displacement versus pseudo-static evaluation of the seismic performance of sliding retaining walls. Bull Earthq Eng 12(3):1239–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi G, Massimino MR, Maugeri M (2015) Experimental study in the shaking table of the input motion characteristics in the dynamic SSI of a SDOF model. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1835–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Bathurst RJ (1996) Deterministic sliding block methods for estimating seismic displacements of earth structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(4):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callisto L, Soccodato FM (2010) Seismic design of flexible cantilevered retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(2):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Geotechnical Society (1992) Canadian foundation engineering manual, 3rd edn. BiTech Publishers, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecconi M, Pane V, Vechietti A (2015) Seismic displacement-based design of embedded retaining structures. Bull Earthq Eng 13(7):1979–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GX, Wang ZH, Zuo X et al (2010) Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests. Chin J Geotech Eng 32(1):89–97 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen GX, Wang ZH, Zuo X et al (2013) Shaking table test on the seismic failure characteristics of a subway station structure on liquefaction ground. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:1489–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GX, Chen S, Qi CZ et al (2015) Shaking table tests on a three-arch type subway station structure in a liquefiable soil. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1675–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GX, Zhou EQ, Wang ZH et al (2016) Experimental investigation on fluid characteristics of medium dense saturated fine sand in pre- and post-liquefaction. Bull Earthq Eng 14(8):2185–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyanova M, Lai CG, Martinelli M (2016) Displacement-based parametric study on the seismic response of gravity earth-retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80(1):210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecemis N, Demirci HE, Karaman M (2015) Influence of consolidation properties on the cyclic re-liquefaction potential of sands. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1655–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertugrul OL, Trandafir AC (2014) Seismic earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable inclusions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(5):417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YF, Wang SM, Chen CB (2011) A united deformation-strength framework for lightweight sand–EPS beads soil (LSES) under cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(8):1144–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao HM, Chen YM, Liu HL et al (2012) Creep behavior of EPS composite soil. Sci China Technol Sci 55(11):3070–3080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G, Psarropoulos P, Anastasopolous I et al (2004) Seismic behaviour of flexible retaining systems subjected to short-duration moderately strong excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(7):537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler E, Enunlu AK (2009) Investigation of dynamic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining structures under earthquake loads. Bull Earthq Eng 7(3):737–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC (2005) Seismic displacements of soil retaining walls situated on slope. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(9):1108–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo SB, Ha JG, Yoo M et al (2014) Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests. Bull Earthq Eng 12(2):961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontoe S, Zdravkovic L, Menkiti CO et al (2012) Seismic response and interaction of complex soil retaining systems. Comput Geotech 39:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koseki J, Totsuoka F, Munaf Y et al (1998) A modified procedure to evaluate active earth pressure at high seismic loads. Soils Found 2(2):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzoni L, Radi E, Tralli A (2007) On the seismic response of a flexible wall retaining a viscous poroelastic soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):818–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KZZ, Chang NY, Ko HY (2010) Numerical simulation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls under seismic shaking. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshchinsky D, Ling HI, Wang J-P et al (2009) Equivalent seismic coefficient in geocell retention systems. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):9–18

  • Li MD, Zhu W, Ma DG et al (2006) Construction technology and application in-situ of expanded polystyrene treated lightweight soil. Chin J Geotech Eng 28(4):533–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YL, Leng WM, Yang GL et al (2015) Seismic active earth pressure of cohesive-frictional soil on retaining wall based on a slice analysis method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 70:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HL, Deng A, Chu J (2006) Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fill. Geotext Geomembr 24(6):331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma SD (2003) Stability and settlement of embankment filled with stabilized light soil. Rock Soil Mech 24(3):331–334 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Madabhushi SPG, Zeng X (2007) Simulating seismic response of cantilever retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(5):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao LC, Wang F, Jie Han et al (2013) Properties and applications of cement-treated sand-expanded polystyrene bead lightweight fill. J Mater Civ Eng 25(1):86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikola RG, Candia G, Sitar N (2016) Seismic earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls in cohesionless soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononobe N, Matuo H (1929) On determination of earth pressures during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the world engineering congress, vol 9. Tokyo, Japan, paper no. 388

  • Nakamura S (2006) Reexamination of mononobe-okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests. Soils Found 46(2):135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Cooperative Highway Research Program (1991) Manuals for design of bridge foundations. Barker RM, Duncan JM, Rojiani KB, Poi PSK, Tan CK, Kim SG (eds) Rep 343. Transportation Research Board, Washington

  • Nazarian HN, Hadjian AH (1979) Earthquake-induced lateral soil pressures on structures. J Geotech Eng 105(9):1049–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–160

  • Okabe S (1924) General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining wall and dam. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 10(6):1277–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarropoulos PN, Klonaris G, Gazetas G (2005) Seismic earth pressures on rigid and flexible retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(7):795–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Abrahamson NA, Bray JD (1998) Simplified frequency content eatimates of earthquake ground motions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(2):150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards R, Elms DG (1979) Seismic behavior of gravity retaining wall. J Geotech Eng 105(4):449–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards RJ, Shi X (1994) Seismic lateral pressures in soils with cohesion. J Geotech Eng 120(7):1230–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards R, Huang C, Fishman KL (1999) Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(9):771–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto di Santolo A, Evangelista A (2011) Dynamic active earth pressure on cantilever retaining walls. Comput Geotech 38(8):1041–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Whitman RV (1970) Design of earth retaining structures for dynamic loads. In: Proceedings of the ASCE specialty conference on lateral stresses in the ground and the design of earth retaining structures. Ithaca, New York, pp 103–147

  • Shukla S, Gupta S, Sivakugan N (2009) Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c-ϕ soil backfill under seismic loading condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(5):690–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddharthan R, Samia A, Norris GM (1990) Simple rigid plastic model for seismic tilting of rigid walls. J Struct Eng 118(2):469–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatopoulos CA, Velgaki EG, Modaressi A et al (2006) Seismic displacement of gravity walls by a two body model. Bull Earthq Eng 4:295–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman RS, Zeng X (1990) The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Géotechnique 40(1):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki M, Shimura N, Fukumura T et al (2015) Seismic performance of reinforced soil wall with untreated and cement-treated soils as backfill using a 1-g shaking table. Soils Found 55(3):626–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Younan AH (1994) Dynamic soil pressures on rigid vertical walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23(3):275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Younan AH (1997) Dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(2):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LY, Chen GX, Chen S (2015) Experimental study on seismic response of geogrid reinforced rigid retaining walls with saturated backfill sand. Geotext Geomembr 43(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P, Elgamal A (2015) Shake table lateral earth pressure testing with dense c-ϕ backfill. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 71:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JH (1975) Earthquake-induced pressures on a rigid wall structure. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 8(3):175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoonz GL, Jeon SS, Kim BT (2004) Mechanical characteristics of light-weighted soils using dredged materials. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 22(4):215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51578286) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013T60529). The authors are grateful to Dr. Chen Weiyun for providing his revision advice. The contributions of anonymous reviewers and editors are also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre of Urban Underground Space, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Hongmei Gao, Zhihua Wang & Guoxing Chen

  2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Hongmei Gao, Ying Hu, Zhihua Wang, Chao Wang & Guoxing Chen

Authors
  1. Hongmei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhihua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guoxing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihua Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, H., Hu, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of a flexible wall retaining EPS composite soil. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 5481–5510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0189-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation