Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 12, pp 5511–5550 | Cite as

Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic response of precast wall connections

  • E. Brunesi
  • R. Nascimbene
Original Research Paper


This paper investigates the seismic response of lightly reinforced precast concrete shear walls typically used for low- to mid-rise residential systems in past and current Dutch building practice. The results of a wide set of pseudostatic cyclic tests performed on full-scale single precast panels with or without openings were examined and discussed, quantifying the sensitivity of structural response and failure mode to changes in axial load and wall geometry. Behavioral aspects of those panels were treated at a global/structural and local/sectional level, posing particular emphasis on their wall-to-foundation and wall-to-wall joints. Asymmetric push–pull tests of precast wall connections were also carried out and presented to characterize the cyclic behavior of this type of joint system under simulated seismic loading. The outcome of this large campaign of experimental tests was then used to develop and validate a simple numerical model to be integrated in a framework for large scale seismic fragility analysis of precast terraced structures built with this particular technology.


Prefabricated structure Shear wall Lightly reinforced wall Wall-to-wall connection Wall-to-foundation connection Cyclic test Numerical modeling Seismic response 



This paper describes an activity that is part of the “Numerical and experimental evaluation of the seismic response of precast wall connections” project at Eucentre, undertaken within the framework of the research program for hazard and risk of induced seismicity in Groningen sponsored by the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV. The authors would like to thank all the parties involved in this project: DICAr Lab of University of Pavia and Eucentre Lab that performed the test, together with NAM, Arup and TU Delft. Moreover, the authors are deeply indebted to Prof. Alberto Pavese, Dr. Filippo Dacarro and Dr. Simone Peloso for the extensive comments given on this research. Lastly, the authors are sincerely thankful to Dr. Giulia Fagà for the insightful support with figure editing.


  1. Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661Google Scholar
  2. Belleri A, Riva P (2012) Seismic performance and retrofit of precast grouted sleeve connections. PCI J 57(1):97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belleri A, Schoettler MJ, Restrepo JI, Fleischman RB (2014) Dynamic behavior of rocking and hybrid cantilever walls in a precast concrete building. ACI Struct J 111(3):661–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belleri A, Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pagani M, Riva P (2015) Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. J Peform Constr Facil ASCE 29(5):04014135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belleri A, Torquati M, Marini A, Riva P (2016) Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 14(4):1103–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer K, Dazio A, Priestley MJN (2008) Inelastic wide-column models for U-shaped reinforced concrete walls. J Earthq Eng 12(S1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11(4):1061–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bommer JJ, Crowley H, Pinho R (2015) A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity. J Seismol 19(2):623–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bournas DA, Negro P, Molina FJ (2013) Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: behavior of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms. Eng Struct 2013(57):609–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R (2014) Extreme response of reinforced concrete buildings through fiber force-based finite element analysis. Eng Struct 69:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Bolognini D, Bellotti D (2015a) Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of reinforced precast concrete framed structures. PCI J 60(2):57–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Deyanova M, Pagani C, Zambelli S (2015b) Numerical simulation of hollow steel profiles for lightweight concrete sandwich panels. Comput Concr 15(6):951–972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Parisi F, Augenti N (2015c) Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis. Eng Struct 104:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pavese A (2016) Mechanical model for seismic response assessment of lightly reinforced concrete walls. Earthq Struct 11(3):461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CEN, European Committee for Standardization (2004a) EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2 (EC2): design of concrete structures—part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  16. CEN, European Committee for Standardization (2004b) EN 1998-1-5. Eurocode 8 (EC8): design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1.5: specific rules for concrete buildings. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  17. Crisafulli FJ, Restrepo JI, Park R (2002) Seismic design of lightly reinforced precast rectangular wall panels. PCI J 47(4):104–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crowley H, Pinho R, Bommer JJ (2004) A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 2(2):173–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dal Lago B, Toniolo G, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2016) Influence of different mechanical column-foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 14(12):3485–3508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dal Lago B, Biondini F, Toniolo G (2017a) Experimental investigation on steel W-shaped folded plate dissipative connectors for horizontal precast concrete cladding panels. J Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1264333 Google Scholar
  21. Dal Lago B, Biondini F, Toniolo G, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2017b) Experimental investigation on the influence of silicone sealant on the seismic behaviour of precast façades. Bull Earthq Eng 15(4):1771–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dazio A, Beyer K, Bachmann H (2009) Quasi-static cyclic tests and plastic hinge analysis of RC structural walls. Eng Struct 31:1556–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Borst R (1987) Smeared cracking, plasticity, creep and thermal loading—a unified approach. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 62(1):89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Englekirk RE (2003) Seismic design of reinforced and precast concrete buildings. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. EOTA, European Organization for Technical Approvals (2010) ETAG 001: guideline for european technical approval of metal anchors for use in concrete—annex C: design methods for anchorages. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  26. Fédération Internationale du Béton (fib), Bulletin 43 (2008) Structural connections for precast concrete buildings. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib, federation internationale du bétonGoogle Scholar
  27. Fintel M (1995) Performance of buildings with shear walls in earthquakes in the last thirty years. PCI J 4(3):62–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischinger M, Kramar M, Isakovic T (2008) Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghobarah A, Youssef M (1999) Modelling of reinforced concrete structural walls. Eng Struct 21(10):912–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hidalgo PA, Ledezma CA, Jordan RM (2002) Seismic behavior of squat reinforced concrete shear walls. Earthq Spectra 18(2):287–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holden T, Restrepo J, Mander JB (2003) Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(3):286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hung C-C, El-Tawil S (2010) Hybrid rotating/fixed-crack model for high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. ACI Mater J 107(6):568–576Google Scholar
  33. Kaldjian MJ (1967) Moment-curvature of beams as Ramberg-Osgood functions. J Struct Div ASCE 93(ST5):53–65Google Scholar
  34. Kang S-M, Kim O-J, Park H-G (2013) Cyclic loading test for emulative precast concrete walls with partially reduced rebar section. Eng Struct 56:1645–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kurama Y, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu LW (1999) Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. ACI Struct J 96(4):622–632Google Scholar
  36. Li B, Qian K, Wu H (2016) Flange effects on seismic performance of reinforced concrete squat walls with irregular or regular openings. Eng Struct 110:127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2014) The Emilia earthquake: seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Spectra 30(2):891–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Manfredi G (2015) Influence of the cladding panels on the first period of one-storey precast building. Bull Earthq Eng 13(5):1531–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 114(8):1804–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mousavi SA, Zahrai SM, Bahrami-Rad A (2014) Quasi-static cyclic tests on super-lightweight EPS concrete shear walls. Eng Struct 65:62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nederlands Normalisatie-instituut (2011) National annex to NEN-EN 1990 + A1 + A1/C2: eurocode: basis of structural design. Delft, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  42. Otani S (1981) Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis. J Fac Eng 36(2):407–441Google Scholar
  43. Palermo M, Trombetti T (2016) Experimentally-validated modelling of thin RC sandwich walls subjected to seismic loads. Eng Struct 119:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Palermo M, Gil-Martín LM, Trombetti T, Hernandez-Montes E (2013) In-plane shear behaviour of thin low reinforced concrete panels for earthquake reconstruction. Mater Struct 46(5):841–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palermo M, Ricci I, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Trombetti T, Foti D, Ivorra S (2014) Preliminary interpretation of shaking-table response of a full-scale 3-storey building composed of thin reinforced concrete sandwich walls. Eng Struct 76:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pavese A, Bournas DA (2011) Experimental assessment of the seismic performance of a prefabricated concrete structural wall system. Eng Struct 33:2049–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peng Y-Y, Qian J-R, Wang Y-H (2016) Cyclic performance of precast concrete shear walls with a mortar-sleeve connection for longitudinal steel bars. Mater Struct 49(6):2455–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Priestley MJN, Sritharan SS, Conley JR, Pampanin S (1999) Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J 44(6):42–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Psycharis IN, Mouzakis HP (2012a) Shear resistance of pinned connections of precast members to monotonic and cyclic loading. Eng Struct 41:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Psycharis IN, Mouzakis HP (2012b) Assessment of the seismic design of precast frames with pinned connections from shaking table tests. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1795–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rezaifar O, Kabir MZ, Taribakhsh M, Tehranian A (2008) Dynamic behaviour of 3D panel single-storey system using shaking-table testing. Eng Struct 30:318–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ricci I, Palermo M, Gasparini G, Silvestri S, Trombetti T (2013) Results of pseudo-static tests with cyclic horizontal load on cast in situ sandwich squat concrete walls. Eng Struct 54:131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodríguez M, Blandón J (2005) Tests on a half-scale two-story seismic-resisting precast concrete building. PCI J 50(1):94–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodriguez ME, Restrepo JI, Carr AJ (2002) Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):693–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salonikios TN, Kappos AJ, Tegos IA, Penelis GG (1999) Cyclic load behavior of low-slenderness R/C walls: design basis and test results. ACI Struct J 96(4):649–660Google Scholar
  56. Salonikios TN, Kappos AJ, Tegos IA, Penelis GG (2000) Cyclic load behavior of low-slenderness R/C walls: failure modes, strength and deformation analysis, and design implications. ACI Struct J 97(1):132–141Google Scholar
  57. Seismosoft (2016) SeismoStruct—a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. URL:
  58. Silva V, Crowley H, Pinho R, Varum H (2013) Extending displacement-based earthquake loss assessment (DBELA) for the computation of fragility curves. Eng Struct 56:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer FF (1996) Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of RC frames: part I. Formulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:711–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Todut C, Dan D, Stoian V (2014) Theoretical and experimental study on precast reinforced concrete wall panels subjected to shear force. Eng Struct 80:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Toranzo LA, Restrepo JI, Mander JB, Carr AJ (2009) Shake-table tests of confined-masonry rocking walls with supplementary hysteretic damping. J Earthq Eng 13(6):882–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsoukantas SG, Tassios TP (1989) Shear resistance of connections between reinforced concrete linear precast elements. ACI Struct J 86(3):242–249Google Scholar
  63. Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP (1987) Behavior of dowels under cyclic deformations. ACI Struct J 84(1):18–30Google Scholar
  64. Wiebe L, Christopoulos C (2010) Characterizing acceleration spikes due to stiffness changes in nonlinear systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(14):1653–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zoubek B, Fischinger M, Isaković T (2016) Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building. Eng Struct 119:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake EngineeringPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations