Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic shear tests on RC precast beam-to-column connections retrofitted with a three-hinged steel device

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent European earthquakes demonstrated that the seismic response of RC precast structures can be significantly influenced by the connection systems. Moreover, during past seismic events, many failures of the beam-to-column connections occurred due to their inadequate strength under seismic loads. The seismic safety of these connections has a crucial role in the overall seismic capacity of existing precast structures. A new connection system is employed as a retrofitting solution for a damaged beam-to-column connection and its cyclic shear performance is investigated by means of two cyclic shear tests on two different configurations. In both the experimental tests, the results demonstrate an efficient behavior of the retrofitted connections under horizontal cyclic loads. The comparison between the performance of the investigated connection and the response of a typical beam-to-column dowel connection allows to discuss the main critical features of the dowel connection system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird A, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2011) Facade damage assessment of multi-storey buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull NZ Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):368–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Riva P (2012) Seismic performance and retrofit of precast concrete grouted sleeve connections. PCI J 57(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Torquati M, Riva P (2014) Seismic performance of ductile connections between precast beams and roof elements. Mag Concr Res 66(11):553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Pagani M, Riva P (2015a) Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. J Perform Constr Facil 29(5):04014135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Torquati M, Riva P, Nascimbene R (2015b) Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures. Earthq Struct 8(3):801–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11(4):1061–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bournas DA, Negro P, Taucer FF (2013) Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):2383–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozzi V, Magliulo G (2012) Struttura e procedimento di montaggio della stessa. December the 24th 2012, Patent No. ITRM20110332 (in Italian)

  • Capozzi V, Castellano MG, Magliulo G (2014) Struttura prefabbricata e procedimento di montaggio. January the 13th 2014, Patent No. 0001412673 (in Italian)

  • Casotto C, Silva V, Crowley H, Nascimbene R, Pinho R (2015) Seismic fragility of Italian RC precast industrial structures. Eng Struct 94:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (1990) Eurocode 0 - basis of structural design. Comité Europèen de Normalisation, European standard EN 1990:2002, Bruxelles, Belgium

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 2 - design of concrete structures. Comité Europèen de Normalisation, European standard EN 1992, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005a) Eurocode 3 - design of steel structures. Comité Europèen de Normalisation, European standard EN 1993, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005b) Eurocode 8 - design of structures for earthquake resistance. Comité Europèen de Normalisation, European standard EN 1998-1, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • CNR 10018 (1999) Apparecchi di appoggio per le costruzioni. Bollettino Ufficiale del CNR, Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • CNR 10025/98 (2000) Istruzioni per il progetto, l’esecuzione ed il controllo delle strutture prefabbricate in calcestruzzo. Bollettino Ufficiale del CNR, Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • D. M. 14/01/2008 (2008) NormeTecniche per le Costruzioni, G.U. n. 29 4 febbraio 2008, Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • da Fonseca TdCS, de Almeida SF, de Hanai JB (2011) Beam-to-column connection of a precast concrete frame strengthened by NSM CFRP strips. In: Ye L, Feng P, Yue Q (eds) Advances in FRP composites in civil engineering. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 858–861

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Lago B, Toniolo G, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2016) Influence of different mechanical column-foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 14(12):3485–3508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ETAG 001 (1997) Guideline for European technical approval of methal anchors for use in concrete. European Organisation for Technical Approvals. 2nd amended April 2013

  • Faggiano B, Iervolino I, Magliulo G, Manfredi G, Vanzi I (2009) Post-event analysis of industrial structures behavior during L’Aquila earthquake. Progettazione Sismica (English Special Edition), 203–208

  • Fischinger M, Kramar M, Isaković T (2008) Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):519–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruppo di Lavoro Agibilità Sismica dei Capannoni Industriali (2012) Linee di indirizzo per interventi locali e globali su edifici industriali monopiano non progettati con criteri antisismici (in Italian). http://www.reluis.it/images/stories/Linee_di_indirizzo_GDL_Capannoni.pdf

  • Kramar M, Isaković T, Fischinger M (2010) Seismic collapse risk of precast industrial buildings with strong connections. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(8):847–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremmyda GD, Fahjan YM, Tsoukantas SG (2014) Nonlinear FE analysis of precast RC pinned beam-to-column connections under monotonic and cyclic shear loading. Bull Earthq Eng 12(4):1615–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge 01/08/2012 n. 122 (2012) Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 6 giugno 2012, n. 74, recante interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici che hanno interessato il territorio delle province di Bologna, Modena, Ferrara, Mantova, Reggio Emilia e Rovigo, il 20 e il 29 maggio 2012 (in Italian). Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 180 del 03/08/2012

  • Magliulo G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008) Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 30(9):2580–2588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Capozzi V, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2011) Neoprene-concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings. Eng Struct 33(2):532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Cimmino M, Capozzi V, Manfredi G (2014a) FEM analysis of the strength of RC beam-to-column dowel connections under monotonic actions. Constr Build Mater 69:271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2014b) Emilia earthquake: the seismic performance of precast RC buildings. Earthq Spectra 30(2):891–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Cimmino M, Capozzi V, Manfredi G (2015) Cyclic shear test on a dowel beam-column connection of precast buildings. Earthq Struct 9(3):541–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozden S, Akpinar E, Erdogan H, Atalay HM (2014) Performance of precast concrete structures in October 2011 Van earthquake, Turkey. Mag Concr Res 66(11):543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psycharis IN, Mouzakis HP (2012) Shear resistance of pinned connections of precast members to monotonic and cyclic loading. Eng Struct 41:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo G (2012) SAFECAST project: European research on seismic behaviour of the connections of precast structures. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon

  • Toniolo G, Colombo A (2012) Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concr 13(2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP (1986) Mathematical-models for dowel action under monotonic and cyclic conditions. Mag Concr Res 38(134):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoubek B, Isakovic T, Fahjan Y, Fischinger M (2013) Cyclic failure analysis of the beam-to-column dowel connections in precast industrial buildings. Eng Struct 52:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoubek B, Fischinger M, Isakovic T (2015) Estimation of the cyclic capacity of beam-to-column dowel connections in precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 13(7):2145–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection within the National project DPC-ReLUIS 2015 WP2 and by ASSOBETON (Italian Association of Precast Industries). The authors also acknowledge eng. Vittorio Capozzi for the collaboration during the tests and engs. Maria Gabriella Castellano and Danilo De Fusco (FIP Industriale S.P.A.) for the interesting comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Magliulo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magliulo, G., Cimmino, M., Ercolino, M. et al. Cyclic shear tests on RC precast beam-to-column connections retrofitted with a three-hinged steel device. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 3797–3817 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0114-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0114-x

Keywords

Navigation