Abstract
In this study, the longitudinal seismic fragility of a five-span cable-stayed bridge with tall piers is investigated using the fragility method. The OpenSees is applied to develop a finite element model of the cable-stayed bridge, and both the geometric and material nonlinearities are considered. A suite of 80 ground motions is selected to perform the nonlinear time history analysis, and the seismic responses of the expansion joint, deck, cables, and piers are discussed to determine the damage indexes of these components. Next, fragility curves are developed to assess the seismic performance of the cable-stayed bridge. The results show that the expansion joint, deck and cables are the vulnerable components, while the failure probability of the pier is relatively low. Moreover, the effects of the deck-pier connections and viscous fluid dampers on the vulnerability of the components and the bridge system are also studied. It is shown that the vulnerability of the cable and deck is sensitive to the deck-pier connections. Moreover, the deck-pier connection enhances the stiffness of the cable-stayed bridge. Therefore, it affects the seismic response of the cable-stayed bridge. However, the deck-pier connection has relatively slight effect on the system fragility. Furthermore, the location of the viscous fluid dampers significantly affects their effectiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Ghaffar AM, Nazmy AS (1991) 3-D nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges. J Struct Eng 117:3456–3476. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3456)
Allam SM, Datta TK (2000) Analysis of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion by response spectrum method. Eng Struct 22:1367–1377. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00076-0
Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis. PEER Report 2006/08. University of California, Berkeley, CA
Barnawi WT, Dyke SJ (2014) Seismic fragility relationships of a cable-stayed bridge equipped with response modification systems. J Bridge Eng 19:A4013003. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000468
Calvi GM, Sullivan TJ, Villani A (2010) Conceptual seismic design of cable-stayed bridges. J Earthq Eng 14:1139–1171. doi:10.1080/13632469.2010.505275
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24:139–171. doi:10.1193/1.2857546
Casciati F, Cimellaro GP, Domaneschi M (2008) Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices. Comput Struct 86:1769–1781. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.01.012
Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B (2004) Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Eng Struct 26:187–199. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006
Dyke SJ, Caicedo JM, Turan G, Bergman LA, Hague S (2003) Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. J Struct Eng ASCE 129:857–872. doi:10.1061//ASCE/0733-9445/2003/129:7/857
Gimsing NJ, Georgakis CT (2011) Cable supported bridges: concept and design. Wiley, Hoboken
Guo AX, Yuan WC, Lan CM, Guan XC, Li H (2015) Time-dependent seismic demand and fragility of deteriorating bridges for their residual service life. Bull Earthq Eng 13:2389–2409. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9722-x
Harmsen S, Perkins D, Frankel A (1999) Deaggregation of probabilistic ground motions in the central and eastern United States. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1–13
HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology, sr2 edn. National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC)
Miyamoto HK, Gilani ASJ, Wada A, Ariyaratana C (2010) Limit states and failure mechanisms of viscous dampers and the implications for large earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:1279–1297. doi:10.1002/eqe.993
Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:823–839. doi:10.1002/eqe.655
Opensees Manual (2009) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley
Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2008) Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1157–1174. doi:10.1002/eqe.801
Pandey MD (1998) An effective approximation to evaluate multinormal integrals. Struct Saf 20:51–67. doi:10.1016/s0167-4730(97)00023-4
Pang YT, Wu X, Shen GY, Yuan WC (2014) Seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertainties. J Bridge Eng 19:04013015. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000565
PEER Ground Motion Database (2015) PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site
Ramadan OMO, Mehanny SSF, Elhowary HA (2014) Seismic vulnerability of box girder continuous bridges under spatially variable ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1727–1748. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9683-0
Soneji BB, Jangid RS (2007) Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge. Eng Struct 29:57–70. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034
Soneji BB, Jangid RS (2008) Influence of soil–structure interaction on the response of seismically isolated cable-stayed bridge. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28:245–257. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.06.005
Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM, Priestley MJN, Kowalsky MJ (2003) The limitations and performances of different displacement based design methods. J Earthq Eng 7:201–241. doi:10.1142/S1363246903001012
Tondini N, Stojadinovic B (2012) Probabilistic seismic demand model for curved reinforced concrete bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 10:1455–1479. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9362-y
Wu WP, Li LF, Shao XD (2016) Seismic assessment of medium-span concrete cable-stayed bridges using the component and system fragility functions. J Bridge Eng 21:04016027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000888
Yuan XX, Pandey MD (2006) Analysis of approximations for multinormal integration in system reliability computation. Struct Saf 28:361–377. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.10.002
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51278183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Hu, S. & Wang, L. Seismic fragility assessment of a multi-span cable-stayed bridge with tall piers. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 3727–3745 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0106-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0106-x