Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 1279–1295 | Cite as

Seismic fragility analysis of large unanchored steel tanks considering local instability and fatigue damage

Original Research Paper

Abstract

When unanchored steel liquid storage tanks are subjected to strong ground motions, the contained liquid may cause uplift of the tank base resulting in compressive buckling of the tank shell and or ultra low-cycle fatigue (ULCF) damage to the shell-to-base welded connections. This paper presents a method for investigating the shell buckling and connection ULCF vulnerability for unanchored steel tank geometries using simplified mass-spring models and incremental dynamic analysis. The presented simplified mass-spring models simulate resistance to local base uplift, tank rocking, and provide equilibrium-based approaches for determining tank shell compressive forces resulting from dynamic earthquake loadings. In this study, four existing tanks (considering both broad and slender geometries) are analyzed under 20 recorded ground motions, scaled at 30 different levels (from 0.05 to 1.5 g) for a total of 2400 dynamic analyses. Results from the incremental dynamic analyses are used to create fragility curves, wherein shell buckling and connection ULCF probabilities are related to the level of seismic excitation. Results from the analyses on the four existing tank geometries highlight shell buckling vulnerabilities for both broad and slender tank geometries under moderate seismic excitation.

Keywords

Unanchored steel tanks Fragility curves Dynamic analysis Fatigue Shell buckling 

References

  1. Ahari MN, Eshghi S, Ashtiany MG (2009) The tapered beam model for bottom plate uplift analysis of unanchored cylindrical steel storage tanks. Eng Struct 31(2009):623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: part 1—guidelines. American Lifeline Allainces, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31(1):579–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clough DP (1977) Experimental evaluation of seismic design methods for broad cylinder tanks. EERC 77/10. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC)Google Scholar
  5. Clough DP, Clough RW (1978) Earthquake simulator studies of cylindrical tanks. Nucl Eng Des 46(2):367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clough RN, Niwa A (1979) Static tilt tests of tall cylindrical liquid storage tanks. EERC 79/06. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC)Google Scholar
  7. Cortes G, Nussbaumer A (2010) Seismic behavior of shell-to-base connections in large storage tanks. Rapport de mandat No. IC 495-1. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. EC8-1 (2014) Eurocode 8 Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. ENV 1998-1. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. EC8-4 (1998) Eurocode 8 Part 4: Silos, Tanks, and Pipelines. ENV 1998-4. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  10. FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—earthquake model. HAZUS MR4 technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujikazu S, Akira I, Hajime H, Yukio M (1988) Experimental study on uplifting behavior of flat-based liquid storage tanks without anchors. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, pp 649–654Google Scholar
  12. Haroun MA (1983) Behaviour of unanchored oil storage tanks: imperial valley earthquake. J Tech Top Civ Eng 109(1):23–38Google Scholar
  13. Haroun MA, Housner GW (1981) Seismic design of liquid storage tanks. In: Proceedings of the journal of technical councils, ASCE, vol 107, no TC-1, pp 191–207Google Scholar
  14. Housner GW (1963) The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):381–387Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen LS (1949) Impulsive hydrodynamics of fluid inside a cylindrical tank and of fluid surrounding a cylindrical pier. Bull Seismol Soc Am 39(3):189–203Google Scholar
  16. K-NET (2010) Japanese National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED). http://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp/
  17. Malhotra PK (1995) Base uplifting analysis of flexibly supported liquid-storage tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:1591–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malhotra PK (2000) Practical nonlinear seismic analysis of tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(2):473–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS (1994a) Beam model for base-uplifting analysis of cylindrical tanks. J Struct Eng 120(12):3471–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS (1994b) Uplifting analysis of base plates in cylindrical tanks. J Struct Eng 120(12):3489–3505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malhotra PK, Veletsos AS, Tang HT (1993) Seismic response of unanchored liquid storage tanks. SMiRT-12, Stuttgart, Germany. August 15–20, 1993, pp 201–212Google Scholar
  22. Manos GC (1993) Shell buckling of unanchored model storage tanks subjected to seismic lateral loading. SMiRT-12, Stuttgart, Germany, August 15–20, 1993, pp 225–230Google Scholar
  23. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual. PEER. University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu
  24. NZSEE (2009) Seismic design of storage tanks. New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Rourke MJ, So P (2000) Seismic fragility curves for on-grade steel tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(4):801–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peek R, Jennings PC (1988) Simplified analysis of unanchored tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:1073–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PEER (2000) Strong motion database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, CA. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/
  28. Prinz GS, Nussbaumer A (2012) On the low-cycle fatigue capacity of unanchored steel liquid storage tank shell-to-base connections. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1943–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prinz GS, Nussbaumer A (2014) Effect of radial base-plate welds on ULCF capacity of unanchored tank connections. J Constr Steel Res 103(2014):131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Protezione C (2010) Italian Department of Civil Protection. http://www.protezionecivile.it/
  31. Psycharis IN (1982) Dynamic behavior of rocking structures allowed to uplift. Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Razzaghi MS, Eshghi S (2014) Probabilistic seismic safety evaluation of precode cylindrical oil tanks. J Perform Constr Facil 29(6):04014170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shih C (1981) Failure of liquid storage tanks due to earthquake excitation. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Swiss Seismological Service (2004) Seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland. Swiss Seismological Service, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LeTourneau UniversityLongviewUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations