Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, seismic assessment of one story precast industrial buildings that constitute majority of industrial facilities in Turkey was investigated by using probabilistic approach. For this purpose, 98 one story precast industrial buildings that represent general structural aspects of precast industrial building stock of Turkey were used. Strength and deformation capacities of buildings were determined by inelastic methods and seismic demands were calculated by nonlinear time history analyses. In order to represent low, moderate and high intensity earthquake levels, more than 300 ground motion records were used. Fragility curves of precast buildings were then constructed by comparing the displacement capacities and seismic demands. Peak ground velocity was used as ground motion parameter to construct analytical fragility curves. Assessment of inventory buildings was performed by considering the effect of lateral strength ratio, stiffness and ductility parameters. Observations have shown that probabilities of lower damage levels (slight and moderate) are almost similar and they are independent from structural parameters considered. It was also observed that ductility and lateral strength ratios (Vt/W) have significant effect on seismic fragilities of precast industrial buildings at higher damage levels. Based on the observations, building stock was classified in three groups. Results have shown that strength and ductility based classification of existing precast industrial buildings is quite effective and it can be used as an important tool for the seismic assessment studies of one story precast industrial buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkar S, Ozen O (2005) Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct D 37:1411–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Sucuoglu H, Yakut A (2005) Displacement based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthq Spectra 21(4):901–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Silva WJ, Chiou BS-J, Wooddell KE, Graves RW, Kottke AR, Boore DM, Kishida T, Donahue JL (2014) NGA-West2 database. Earthq Spectra 30:989–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atakoy H (2000) The August 17th earthquake and the prefabricated structures built by the members of the prefabric union. Concrete Prefabrication, No: 52-53

  • Bilgin H (2013) Fragility-based assessment of public buildings in Turkey. Eng Struct 56:1283–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englekirk RE (2003) Seismic design of reinforced and precast concrete buildings. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA (2008) Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey. Eng Struct 30:1360–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy U, Tankut T, Ozcebe G (1995) The seismic behavior of precast buildings connections. The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, project number: INTAG-504

  • Ersoy U, Ozcebe G, Tankut T (2000) Observed precast building damages in 1999 Marmara and Duzce earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 10th prefabrication symposium, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Karimi K, Bakhshi A (2006) Development of fragility curves for unreinforced masonry buildings before and after upgrading using analytical method. In: Proceedings of first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Kayhan AH (2008) Damage and economic loss estimation for pin connected precast buildings. PhD Thesis, Pamukkale University

  • Kircil MS, Polat Z (2006) Fragility analysis of mid-rise rc frame buildings. Eng Struct 28(9):1335–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberatore L, Sorrentino L, Liberatore D, Decanini LD (2013) Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes. Eng Fail Anal 34:629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanci M (2010) Seismic performance estimation of existing industrial precast structures based on building inventories. M. Sc. Thesis, Pamukkale University

  • Palanci M (2014) Estimation of earthquake insurance rates by using probabilistic methods in existing industrial precast buildings. PhD Thesis, Pamukkale University

  • Palanci M, Senel SM (2013) Rapid seismic performance assessment method for one story hinged precast buildings. Struct Eng Mech 48(2):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanci M, Kalkan A, Yilmaz Y and Senel SM (2014) Effect of various hysteretic models on seismic fragilities of precast industrial buildings. In: Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Parisi F, De Luca F, Petruzzelli F, De Risi R, Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I (2012) Field inspection after the May 20th and 29th 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. http://www.reluis.it. Accessed 01 April 2016

  • Posada M, Wood SL (2002) Seismic performance of precast industrial buildings in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 7th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Boston, p 542

  • Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley, Canada, p 667

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Sritharan S, Conley JR, Pampanin S (1999) Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J 44(6):42–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia, p 721

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability functions: compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy

  • Scott BD, Park R, Priestley MJN (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI Struct J 79(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Senel SM, Palanci M (2013) Structural aspects and seismic performance of 1-story precast buildings in Turkey. J Perform Constr Facil 27(4):437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senel SM, Palanci M, Kalkan A, Yılmaz Y (2013) Investigation of shear and overturning safety of hinged connections in existing precast buildings. Tek Dergi 24(4):6505–6528

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Kim SH, Kushiyama S, Yi JH (2002) Fragility curves of concrete bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Earthq Eng Vib 1(2):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sucuoglu H, Yazgan U (2003) Simple survey procedures for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. In: Wasti ST, Ozcebe G (eds) Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings. NATO Science Series IV Kluwer, Netherlands, pp 97–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • TEC 1975 (1975) Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC 1998 (1998) Specifications for structures to be built in seismic zones. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC 2007 (2007) Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Y (2013) The investigation of structural parameters that affect seismic performance of existing one story precast industrial buildings. M. Sc. Thesis, Pamukkale University

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support provided by Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Project No: 110M255. The authors wish to express their gratitude to directorate of DOIZ) for providing design projects of precast buildings. Ground motion records used in this study are downloaded from the PEER web site. The authors also acknowledge the PEER for providing the processed data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevket Murat Senel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palanci, M., Senel, S.M. & Kalkan, A. Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 271–289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x

Keywords

Navigation