Abstract
Nuclear fuel fabrication and reprocessing facilities have glove boxes that are extensively used as a primary containment for radiological material. These equipment are maintained under negative pressure using ventilation system and possess high degree of leak tightness. Sometimes, they are used as a standalone structure and many a times, interconnected to each other. Normally, they are not anchored to the floor, which raises serious concerns about their seismic performance. To check seismic stability of the glove boxes and evaluate safety margins in design, tri directional fullscale shake table experiments of two interconnected glove boxes had been carried out. Two configurations were compared; in first, both the boxes were connected through flexible linkage (material transfer tunnel) and in second both were rigidly connected via structural members. Objective of experiments was to observe effects of seismic excitation on leak tightness, structural integrity and overall stability of two interconnected glove boxes. Subsequently, nonlinear finite element analysis was carried out to establish and develop analysis methodology. Experimental results were utilized for model benchmarking. Furthermore, a numerical method was developed to determine safe upper bounds on sliding displacements. This paper highlighted critical findings emanated from experimental results and examined their effect on seismic stability. Enhanced seismic stability in case of rigidly connected boxes was observed. Rigid body motions (mainly sliding and low magnitude rocking) dominated the response with very limited effect of elastic motions. Methodology used for modelling and analyzing glove boxes under seismic loading using finite element methods was also presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
10648-1, ISO (1997) Containment enclosures—Part 1: design principles. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
10648-2, ISO (1992) Containment enclosures—Part 2: classification according to leak tightness and associated checking methods. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
AERB/SG/S-11 (1990) Seismic studies and design basis ground motion for nuclear power plant sites. The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), Mumbai
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (2010) Boiler and pressure vessel code, Section-III, Divison 1- Subsection NB. ASME, New York
Anitescu M, Potra FA (1997) Formulating dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems. Nonlinear Dyn 14(3):231–247
ASCE, 43-05 (2005) Seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components in nuclear facilities. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston
Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River
Bhaskararao AV, Jangid RS (2006) Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers. Bull Earthq Eng 4:43–64
Bhaskararao AV, Jangid RS (2007) Optimum viscous damper for connecting adjacent SDOF structures for harmonic and stationary white-noise random excitations. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 36:563–571
C852-09, ASTM standard (2009) Standard guide for design criteria for plutonium glove boxes. American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken
Department of Earthquake Engineering (DEQ), IIT Roorkee. Envelope spectra for 500 MWE plant on rock site, project number-P-483. External Report, Department of earthquake engineering, Roorkee
Ghosh AK, Reddy GR, Kushwaha HS (2001) Evaluation of seismic fragility of structures and components: outline of a proposed program of study. Internal Report, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Mumbai
Heinstein MW, Mello FJ, Attaway SW, Laursen TA (2000) Contact impact modelling in explicit transient dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187(3–4):621–640
Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL (1977) Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 5:283–292
Housner GW (1963) The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 53:403–417
IEEE, 344™ (2004) IEEE recommended practice for seismic qualification of class 1E equipment for nuclear power generating stations. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Iyenger RN, Raghukanth STG (2003) Unform hazard spectra for Tarapur and Mumbai. BRNS project: interim progress report. MCV/RNI/DAE/102, BARC, Mumbai
Patel CC, Jangid RS (2014) Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper. Struct Control Health Monit 21:205–224
Peña F, Prieto F, Lourenço PB, CamposCosta A, Lemos JV (2007) On the dynamics of rocking motion of single rigid block structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:2383–2399
Saraswat A, Reddy GR, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Kumar Arun (2014) Seismic stability of a standalone glove box structure. Nucl Eng Design 276:178–190
Saraswat A, Reddy GR, Ghosh AK, Ghosh S, Kumar Arun (2015) Seismic stability of interconnected glove boxes. Nucl Eng Des 293:357–370
Sharf I, Gilardi G (2002) Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling. Mech Mach Theory 37:1213–1239
Simo JC, Laursen TA (1992) An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Comput Struct 42(1):97–116
Simulia Abaqus 6.10 Documentation, Analysis user’s manual, Chapters 35–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saraswat, A., Reddy, G.R., Umashankar, C. et al. Seismic stability of two interconnected steel structures freely standing on the floor. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 3259–3282 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9936-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9936-1