Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating ground motion incoherence through finite source simulation: a case study of the 1980 El-Asnam Earthquake

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial variability of ground motions has significant influence on dynamic response of extended structures such as bridges and tunnels. In this study, the widely used finite-source ground motion simulation approach, the so-called Empirical Green’s Function (EGF) method, is extended to synthesize seismic motions across an array of stations located at bedrock in the epicentral region of the 1980 El-Asnam region (North-West Algeria). The target event being simulated is the October 10 1980 \( M_{s} = 7.2 \) Earthquake, and the EGF is obtained from the ground motion recorded at Sogedia Factory station during the 8 November 1980 \( M_{L} = 5.6 \) aftershock. Coherency functions are then estimated from the simulated ground accelerations. A parametric study investigating the influence of shear wave velocity, earthquake magnitude, and epicentral distance is conducted by simulating ground acceleration for different scenarios using the Hybrid Green’s Function method. The main finding of the study is that finite source effects can cause significant loss in coherency at bedrock in the near-field. In the far-field, the source effect alone does not seem to produce incoherent motion, which implies that scattering and local site effects could be dominating there. Furthermore, coherency functions are found to be more sensitive to inter-station separation in the near-field than in the far-field. Increasing shear wave velocity seems to increase coherency functions, and larger earthquakes seem to produce more incoherent motion than smaller ones. The simulation method presented here produces incoherent motion mainly due to the finite source effect, while path effects are partially accounted for through the EGF, and local site effects are not considered. In this sense, the estimated coherency functions represent that of plane waves. A parametric model of plane wave coherency is calibrated and presented based on the simulation results. The results indicate that the parametric model can be used as a first approximation, and at least an upper bound of lagged coherency in the near-field region of the El-Asnam Earthquake scenario. This model could be useful in random vibration analysis or generation of spatially variable ground motion for time history analysis of lifeline structures in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aagaard BT, Graves RW, Rodgers A, Brocher TM, Simpson RW, Dreger D, Petersson NA, Larsen SC, Ma S, Jachens RC (2010) Ground-motion modelling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, part II: simulation of long-period and broadband ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:2945–2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson N, Schneider JF, Stepp JC (1991a) Spatial coherency of shear waves from the Lotung, Taiwan large-scale seismic test. Struct Saf 10:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson N, Schneider JF, Stepp JC (1991b) Empirical spatial coherency functions for application to soil-structure interaction analyses. Earthq Spectra 7(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afif Chaouch K, Tiliouine B, Hammoutene M (2014) Effects of layered stochastic soil profile on the coherency functions of spatially variable seismic ground motions: case study of the El-Asnam region (NW Algeria). In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on numerical methods in geotechnical engineering: probabilistic methods and neural networks, vol 2, pp 441–446

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancheta TD, Stewart JP, Abrahamson NA (2011) Engineering characterization of earthquake ground motion coherency and amplitude variablity. In: 4th IASPEI/IAEE international symposium: effects of surface geology on seismic motion. University of California Santa Barbara, 23–26 Aug 2011

  • Betbeder-Matibet J, Bour M (2002) Lois d’atténuation pour les valeurs du pic du mouvement et d’ordonnées spectrales. Cahier Technique AFPS 23:23–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi K, Hao H (2012) Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions. Probab Eng Mech 29:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielak J, Ghattas O, Kim EJ (2005) Parallel octree-based finite element method for large-scale earthquake ground motion simulation. Comput Model Eng Sci 10:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielak J, Graves RW, Olsen KB, Taborda R, Ramirez-Guzman L, Day SM, Ely GP, Roten D, Jordan TH, Maechling PJ, Urbanic J, Cui Y, Juve G (2010) the shakeout earthquake scenario: verification of three simulation sets. Geophys J Int 180:375–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt BA, Herraiz M (1983) Simplified estimation of seismic moment from seismograms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:735–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure appl Geophys 160:635–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:440–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapellier D, Mari JL (2011) Cours de géophysique, Université de Lausanne. Institut français du pétrole

  • Cisternas A, Dorel J, Gaulon R (1982) Models of the complex source of the El-Asnam Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:2245–2266

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechamps A, Gaudemer Y (1981) Etude d’ondes telesismiques longues périodes. Journées Scientifiques d’Alger sur le séisme d’El-Asnam du 10 Octobre 1980, 15 et 16 Juin: 132–138

  • Dechamps A, Gaudemer Y, Cisternas A (1982) The El-Asnam, Algeria, earthquake of 10 october 1980: multiple-source mechanism determined from long-period records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1111–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1996) A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multiple support seismic excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:713–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despeypoux (1984) Some lessons to be drawn from the El-Asnam Earthquake of 10 October 1980. In Proceedings of the 8th world conference earthquake engineering V, San Francisco, California, USA, pp 849–856

  • Ding H, Song Z (2010) Effects of source parameters on coherency function of ground motion. J Vib Shock 29(7):16–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding H, Liu Q, Jin X, Yuan Y (2004) Coherency function model of ground motion at base-rock. In Proceedings of the 14th world conference earthquake engineering, paper no. 2692, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Faccioli E (1991) Studies on the spatial variability of ground motion for the design of extended structures. In: International workshop on seismology and earthquake engineering, Mexico, pp 177–186

  • Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A (1997) 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. J Seismol 1:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller RJ (1976) Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66:1521–1523

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves RW (1996) Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1091–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves RW, Pitarka A (2010) Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:2095–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of strong ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:617–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammoutene M, Tiliouine B, Bard PY (1992) A two dimensional nonstationary optimized accelerogram scaled for magnitude, distance and soil conditions. In Proceedings of the 10th world conference earthquake engineering, vol 2, pp 817–821, Madrid, Spain

  • Hao H, Gaull BA (2004) Prediction of seismic ground motion in Perth Wester Australia for engineering application. In: 13th world conference earthquake engineering, paper no. 1892, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Hao H, Oliveira CS, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion progressing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nucl Eng Des 111:293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke E (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. J Eng Mech ASCE 112(2):914–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS, Wang W (1990) Response of indeterminate two span beam to spatially varying earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindy A, Novak M (1980) Pipeline response to random ground motion. J Eng Mech ASCE 106(2):339–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Horike M, Takeuchi Y (1996) Comparison of spatial variation of seismic motion in three different geological conditions. In Proceeding of the 11th world conference earthquake engineering, paper no. 135, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Irikura K (1983) Semi empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ Jpn 33:63–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong acceleration motions using empirical Green’s function. In: Proceedings of the 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, vol 7, pp 151–156

  • Irikura K, Kamae K (1994) Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Greens function technique. Ann Geophys XXXVII(6):1721–1743

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K, Muramatu I (1982) Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international microzonation conference, Seattle, pp 447–458

  • Irikura K, Kagawa T, Sekiguchi H (1997) Revision of the empirical Green’s function method by Irikura (1986), programme and abstracts. The Seismological Society of Japan, vol 2, p B25

  • Jenkins GW, Watts DG (1969) Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Chen C, Mi-yu Zhang (2000) Far-field analysis of effects of unilateral rupturing fault on the space correlation of strong ground motion. Acta Seismol Sin 13(5):544–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Midorikawa S (2004) A simplified method for simulation of strong ground motion using finite rupture model of the earthquake source. J Seismol 8:467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Mohan K (2008) Simulation of accelerograms from simplified deterministic approach for the 23rd October 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu, Japan earthquake. J Seismol 12:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamae K, Irikura K (1998) Source model of the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake and simulation of near source ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:400–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamae K, Irikura K, Pitarka A (1998a) A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green’s function. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamae K, Bard PY, Irikura K (1998b) Prediction of strong ground motion at EURO-SEISTEST site using the empirical Green’s function method. J Seismol 2:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1979) A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1645–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatitsch D, Vilotte J-P (1998) The spectral element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(2):268–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang JZ, Hao H, Gaull BA, Sinadinovski C (2006) Simulation of strong motions with a combined Grenn’s function and stochastic approach. Earthquake Engineering in Australia, Canberra, 24–26 Nov 2006

  • Liang JZ, Hao H, Gaull BA, Sinadinovski C (2008) Estimation of strong ground motions in Southwest Western Australia with a combined Green’s function and stochastic approach. J Earthq Eng 12(3):382–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco JE, Wong HL (1986) Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:891–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupoi A, Franchin P, Pinto PE, Monti G (2005) Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai PM, Imperatori W, Olsen KB (2010) Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S backscattering. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:2124–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzieri I, Stupazzini M, Guidotti R, Smerzini C (2013) SPEED: spectral elements in elastodynamics with discontinuous Galerkin: a con-conforming approach for 3D multi-scale problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 95(12):991–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke W, Lerner Lam AL, Dubendorff B, Pacheco J (1990) Polarization and coherence of 5 to 30 Hz seismic wave fields at a hard rock site and their relevance to velocity heterogeneities in the crust. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80:430–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikumo T, Irikura K, Imagawa K (1981) Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (abs.). IASPEI 21st General Assembly, London

  • Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM (1992) Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridge. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak M, Hindy A (1979) Seismic response of buried pipelines. In: Proceedings of the third Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Montreal, Canada, Jun, vol 1, pp 177–203

  • Nuti C, Vanzi I (2004) Influence of earthquake spatial variability on the differential displacement of soil and single degree of freedom structures. Technical Report DIS 1/2004, Departement of Structures, University of Roma Tre

  • Oliveira CS, Hao H, Penzien J (1991) Ground motion modeling for multiple-input structural analysis. Struct Saf 10:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavic R, Koller MG, Bard PY, Lacave-Lachet C (2000) Ground motion prediction with the empirical Grenn’s function technique: an assessment of uncertainties and confidence level. J Seismol 4:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovski J, Milutinovic Z (1981) Deconvolution analysis of surface accelerogram records in El-Asnam region. Actes des journées scientifiques sur le séisme d’El-Asnam du 10.10.80, Alger, 15-16 Juin:373–401

  • Pitarka A (1999) 3D elastic finite-difference modelling of seismic motion using staggered grids with nonuniform spacing. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:54–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan O, Novak M (1993) Coherency functions for spatially correlated seismic ground motions, Geotechnical Research Centre Report No. GEOT 9 93, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, 1993

  • Roumelioti Z, Kiratzi A, Thcodulidis N, Papaioannou C (2000) A comparative study of a stochastic and deterministic simulation of strong ground motion applied to the Kozani-Grevena (NW Greece) 1995 sequence. Ann Geophys 43(5):951–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupakhety R, Sigbjörnsson R (2012) Spatial variability of strong ground motion: novel system-based technique applying parametric time series modelling. Bull Earthq Eng 10:1193–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupakhety R, Sigbjörnsson R (2013) Rotation-invariant measures of earthquake response spectra. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1885–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupakhety R, Sigbjörnsson R (2014a) Three-dimensional characteristics of strong-ground motion in the near-fault area. In Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, 25–29 Aug 2014

  • Rupakhety R, Sigbjörnsson R (2014b) Rotation-invariant formulation of strong ground-motion parameters. In Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, 25–29 Aug 2014

  • Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjörnsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 8(4):787–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa-Cruz S, Heredia-Zavoni E, Harichandran RS (2000) Low-frequency behavior of coherency for strong ground motions in Mexico city and Japan. In: 12th World conference in earthquake engineering, Auckland, New-Zealand, Paper No. 76:1–8

  • Schneider JF, Abrahamson NA, Stepp JC (1992) The spatial variability of earthquake ground motion and effects of local site conditions. In Proceedings of the 10th world conference earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, vol 2, pp 967–972

  • Shinouzuka M, Deodatis G, Harada T (1987) Digital simulation of seismic ground motion. Technical Report NCEER-87-0017

  • Smerzini C, Villani M (2012) Broadband numerical simulations in complex near field geological configurations: the case study of the Mw 6.3 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2436–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, McLaren JP, Saikia CK (1988). Site-specific estimation of spatial incoherence of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, recent advances in ground-motion evaluation. ASCE, Park City, Utah, pp 188–202

  • Somerville PG, Mclaren JP, Sen MK, Helmberger DV (1991) The influence of site condition on the spatial incoherence of ground motions. Struct Saf 10:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spudich P (1994) Recent seismological insights into the spatial variation of earthquake ground motions. In: Proceedings of ATC-35 Seminar on New developments in earthquake ground motion estimation and implications for engineering design practice, ATC 35-1, pp 13.1–13.31

  • Suzuki S, Asano K (2000) Simulation of near source ground motion and its characteristics. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling M, Abrahamson N (2007) Spatial coherency of ground motions for embedded structures. In: 4th International conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Yielding G, Jackson JA, King GCP, Sinvhal H, Vita-Finzi C, Wood RM (1981) Relations between surface deformation, fault geometry, seismicity, and rupture characteristics during the E1-Asnam (Algeria) earthquake of 10 October 1980. Earth Planet Sci Lett 56:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A (1994) On the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its effects on lifelines. Eng Struct 16(7):534–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A (2009) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions. Modeling and engineering applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Harada T (1997) Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherence and strain estimates. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Shinozuka M (1991) Stochastic differential ground motion. Struct Saf 10:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LGSDS, Seismic Engineering and Structural Dynamics Laboratory, National Polytechnic School, Algiers, Algeria

    K. AfifChaouch, B. Tiliouine & M. Hammoutene

  2. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC), University of Iceland, Selfoss, Iceland

    R. Sigbjörnsson & R. Rupakhety

Authors
  1. K. AfifChaouch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Tiliouine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Hammoutene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Sigbjörnsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Rupakhety
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rupakhety.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AfifChaouch, K., Tiliouine, B., Hammoutene, M. et al. Estimating ground motion incoherence through finite source simulation: a case study of the 1980 El-Asnam Earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 1195–1217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9867-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9867-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation