Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shaking table test method of building curtain walls using floor capacity demand diagrams

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic demands of a curtain wall (CW) relate to the floor response of the main structure. These demands include both acceleration and deformation. Floor capacity spectrum combines these demands into one acceleration-displacement response spectrum (ADRS) representing the CW as a single degree of freedom system. The in-plane (IP) load–displacement relationship can be transformed to the acceleration-displacement format (capacity curve) of the ADRS. The intersection of the capacity curve and the ADRS is the performance point (PP) of the CW system. Another way to determine the PP is through the floor response analysis of the main structure where the pairs of acceleration and displacement demands form the demand PPs. In shaking table testing of the CW system, the two coordinates of the PP can be simulated by applying the IP deformation with a specially designed loading frame, then exciting the test specimen by the shaking table in the out-of-plane direction. PPs are accurately reproduced and the seismic performance of the CW system is evaluated. The applicability and reliability of this novel shaking table test method are discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Architectural Manufacture Association (2009a) Recommended dynamic test method for determining the seismic drift causing glass fallout from a wall system (AAMA 501.6-09). Schaumburg, IL

  • American Architectural Manufacture Association (2009b) Recommended static testing method for evaluating curtain wall and storefront systems subjected to seismic and wind induced interstory drift (AAMA 501.4-09). Schaumburg, IL

  • Andrew C (2007) Architectural design for earthquake. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, SEI/ASCE 7–10. ASCE Standard No. 7–10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird A, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2012) Façade damage assessment of concrete buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Structural Concrete 13(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2001) NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA Report No. 274. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2011) FEMA E-74: reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage—a practical guide. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Z, Zhang Y, Liu J (1998) Shaking table test of glass curtain wall’s seismic response. In: Proceedings of the 5th national conference of earthquake engineering, pp 876–871 (in Chinese)

  • China National Standard (2001) Shaking table test method of earthquake resistant performance for building curtain wall (GB/T 18575-2001). Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • China National Standard (2014) Shaking table test method of earthquake resistant performance for building curtain wall (GB/T 18575-201X). Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Computers and Structures Inc. (2012) SAP2000 V14: integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual, Berkeley, CA

  • Evans D, Ramirez FJL (1989) Glass damage in the September 19, 1985 Mexico earthquake. In: Bertero VV (ed) Lessons learned from the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, pp 234–236

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2006) FEMA 461: Interim protocols for determining seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components through laboratory testing. Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Puerto Rico

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA (1998). Development and use of capacity spectrum method. In: Proceedings of 6th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Seattle. CD-ROM. EERI, Oakland

  • Günay S, Mosalam KM (2013) PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited. J Earthq Eng 17(6):829–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B (2014) Floor seismic demand of the curtain wall system on tall buildings and experimental methodology with shaking table. Doctoral dissertation, Tongji University

  • International Building Code (2006). Whittier, CA

  • International Code Council—Evaluation Service (ICC-ES) (2012) AC156: acceptance criteria for seismic qualification by shake-table testing of nonstructural components and systems, Whittier, CA

  • Lu W, Huang B (2008) Study on the shaking table test methods of architectural curtain walls. J Disaster Prevent Mitig Eng 28(4):447–453 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Yan D (1998) Cycle loading and shaking table testing of hidden frame glass curtain wall. Build Struct 3:54–57 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) of the People’s Republic of China (2003) Technical code for glass curtain wall engineering (JGJ102-2003). China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) of the People’s Republic of China (2010) Code for seismic design of buildings (GB 50011-2010). China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E, Mosqueda G, Retamales R, Pekcan G (2012) Performance of nonstructural components during the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake. Earthq Spectra 28(S1):S453–S471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitherman R, Sabol TA (1995) Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: reconnaissance report-nonstructural damage. Earthq Spectra 11(Supp. 2):453–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi A (2005) Development of a seismic vulnerability evaluation procedure for architectural curtain walls. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University

  • Tongji University (2001) Technical specification for point supported glass curtain wall (CECS127: 2001). China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Hao R (2001) Shaking table test of the stone curtain wall with undercut connections. Building Structure 31(4):70 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Xiao C, Zhao X (2002) Seismic performance test of curtain wall with shaking table. Build Struct 32(9):65–67 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by China National Science and Technology Major Project under award number 2013ZX06005004-002-001 and China National Science Foundation under award numbers 51078290 and 51578405. This support is greatly acknowledged. The second and fourth authors recognize the additional funding from the Republic of Singapore’s National Research Foundation through a grant to the Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore (BEARS) for Singapore-Berkeley Building Efficiency and Sustainability in the Tropics (SinBerBEST) Program. BEARS has been established by the University of California, Berkeley as a center for intellectual excellence in research and education in Singapore. The authors thank Dr. Selim Günay of UC-Berkeley for his valuable comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Structural Engineering and Disaster Reduction, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Wensheng Lu, Baofeng Huang & Shiming Chen

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, 723 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1710, USA

    Khalid M. Mosalam

Authors
  1. Wensheng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baofeng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Khalid M. Mosalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid M. Mosalam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, W., Huang, B., Chen, S. et al. Shaking table test method of building curtain walls using floor capacity demand diagrams. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 3185–3205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9866-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9866-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation