Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role played by inclination in both the load carrying capacity and seismic assessment of masonry bell towers is investigated through the results obtained from different analyses on three case studies. The Italian Code for the built heritage is not explicit about the influence of inclination on the seismic assessment of towers, leaving to practitioners the task to properly consider it, potentially leading to both an overestimation of the capacity and an underestimation of the horizontal actions. The case studies investigated in this paper are three leaning masonry bell towers, all exhibiting a quite meaningful inclination and all located in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), recently (2012) stricken by a moderate/high intensity seismic sequence. This study compares the procedure provided by the Italian Code with the finite element (FE) results obtained through non-linear static analyses and proposes a modification of the Italian code simplified mechanical model (SMM), which explicitly accounts for the actual inclination of the towers within a cantilever beam approach. The FE results show that inclination may considerably reduce the load carrying capacity, increasing the seismic vulnerability of the structures. The SMM approach proposed properly takes into account the role played by inclination, always providing results on the safe side with respect to FEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abruzzese D, Miccoli L, Yuan J (2009) Mechanical behavior of leaning masonry Huzhu Pagoda. J Cult Herit 10:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzani A, Binda L, Carpinteri A, Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G (2010) A multilevel approach for the damage assessment of historic masonry towers. J Cult Herit 11:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli G, Betti M, Vignoli A (2016) A numerical study on seismic risk assessment of historic masonry towers: a case study in San Gimignano. Bull Earthq Eng 14:1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar A, Sahin A, Özcan M, Yildirim F (2010) Numerical damage assessment of Haghia Sophia bell tower by nonlinear FE modeling. Appl Math Model 34:92–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardeschi K, Padovani C, Pasquinelli G (2004) Numerical modelling of the structural behaviour of Buti’s bell tower. J Cult Herit 5:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binda L, Zanzi L, Lualdi M, Condoleo P (2005) The use of georadar to assess damage to a masonry bell tower in Cremona, Italy. NDT & E Int 38:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camata G, Cifelli L, Spacone R, Conte J, Torrese P (2008) Safety analysis of the bell tower of S. Maria Maggiore Cathedral in Guardiagrele (Italy). In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

  • Carpinteri A, Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G (2006) Numerical assessment of three medieval masonry towers subjected to different loading conditions. Mason Int 19:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Casolo S (1998) A three dimensional model for vulnerability analyses of slender masonry medieval towers. J Earthq Eng 2(4):487–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Casolo S (2001) Significant ground motion parameters for evaluation of the seismic performance of slender masonry towers. J Earthq Eng 5(2):187–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Casolo S, Milani G, Uva G, Alessandri C (2013) Comparative seismic vulnerability analysis on ten masonry towers in the coastal Po Valley in Italy. Eng Struct 49:465–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California. Report No. PEER-1999/02. University of California, Berkeley

  • Circolare 617 2009 (Explicative Notes of Italian National Technical Code) (2009) Istruzioni Per L’applicazione Delle «Nuove Norme Tecniche Per Le Costruzioni» Di Cui Al Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008, CIRCOLARE 2 Febbraio 2009, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 47, 26 Febbraio 2009 (in Italian)

  • CSI, Computers and Structures Inc. (2013) CSi Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge, Berkeley

  • DPCM (Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri) (2011) Linee Guida Per La Valutazione E La Riduzione Del Rischio Sismico Del Patrimonio Culturale Con Riferimento Alle Norme Tecniche Per Le Costruzioni Di Cui Al Decreto Del Ministero Delle Infrastrutture E Dei Trasporti Del 14 Gennaio 2008 [Guidelines for assessment and sesimic risk reduction of cultural heritage], Rome (in Italian)

  • Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman J (1992) Leaning towers. Meccanica 27(3):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman J (1995) The stone skeleton: structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivorra S, Pallares FJ (2006) Dynamic investigations on a masonry bell tower. Eng Struct 28:660–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço PB, de Borst R, Rots J (1997) A plane stress softening plasticity model for orthotropic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:4033–4057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano R, Sacco E (1998) Damage of masonry panels reinforced by FRP sheets. Int J Solids Struct 35(15):1723–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani G, Valente M (2015a) Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: possibilities of non-linear Finite Elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms. Eng Fail Anal 47:129–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani G, Valente M (2015b) Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches. Eng Fail Anal 54:13–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani G, Lourenço PB, Tralli A (2006a) Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls, Part I: failure surfaces. Comput Struct 84(3–4):166–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani G, Lourenço PB, Tralli A (2006b) Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls, Part II: structural examples. Comput Struct 84(3–4):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani G, Casolo S, Naliato A, Tralli A (2012) Seismic assessment of a medieval masonry tower in northern Italy by limit, nonlinear static, and full dynamic analyses. Int J Archit Herit 6(5):489–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modena C, Valluzzi MR, Tongini FR, Binda L (2002) Design choices and intervention techniques for repairing and strengthening of the Monza cathedral bell-tower. Constr Build Mater 16:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTC 2008 (New Technical Norms on Constructions) (2008) Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008, Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministero delle Infrastrutture (GU n.29 04/02/2008), Rome (in Italian)

  • Pena F, Lourenço PB, Mendez N, Oliveira D (2010) Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower. Eng Struct 32:1466–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintucchi B, Zani N (2014) Effectiveness of nonlinear static procedures for slender masonry towers. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva P, Perotti F, Guidoboni E, Boschi E (1998) Seismic analysis of the Asinelli Tower and earthquakes in Bologna. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17:525–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo G, Bergamo O, Damiani L, Lugato D (2010) Experimental analysis of the Saint Andrea Masonry Bell Tower in Venice. A new method for the determination of Tower Global Young’s Modulus E. Eng Struct 32:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko S (1938) Vibration problems in engineering. D. Van Nostrand, Inc., New York, pp 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente M, Milani G (2016a) Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North-East of Italy. Eng Struct 114:241–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente M, Milani G (2016b) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108:74–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH, Fenton GA, Heredia-Zavoni E (1999) SIMQKE-II, conditioned earthquake ground motion simulator. User’s manual. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalka KA (2002) Global structural analysis of buildings. Taylor & Francis E-Library, London, pp 43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanotti Fragonara L, Boscato G, Ceravolo R et al (2016) Dynamic investigation on the Mirandola bell tower in post-earthquake scenarios. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9970-z

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering ABC, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Gabriele Milani, Rafael Shehu & Marco Valente

Authors
  1. Gabriele Milani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael Shehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Valente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Milani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Milani, G., Shehu, R. & Valente, M. Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 1707–1737 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0043-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation