Skip to main content
Log in

Lateral load testing of an existing two story masonry building up to near collapse

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory testing, although necessary to understand failure mechanisms of individual masonry walls, spandrels or small scale building models, cannot fully mimic the real system behavior of masonry structures. In order to observe the performance of an existing two story masonry structure, cyclic lateral load testing up to near collapse was conducted. The test building was sliced approximately in the middle through the reinforced concrete slabs of both stories and one side was strengthened with the objective of obtaining a strong reaction wall. The other side of the structure was taken as the test structure with a floor plan of approximately 10 m × 10 m. Hydraulic actuators attached at the slabs of both stories were employed to impose one way cyclic displacement excursions. Flexural and shear deformations on a number of walls were measured and crack propagations were monitored. The structure was tested up to a lateral strength drop of approximately 20 % from the ultimate load, which occurred at a drift ratio of about 0.60 %. The failure of the walls in the building, which were mostly failed in a diagonal tension mode, was concentrated on the first story. Results of this valuable test provide important data on the performance of an actual masonry building and were employed to assess the applicability of various stiffness and strength and simplified load-deformation models in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams D, Smith T, Lynch J, Franklin S (2007) Effectiveness of rehabilitation on seismic behaviour of masonry piers. J Struct Eng ASCE 133:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K (2012) Peak and residual strengths of brick masonry spandrels. Eng Struct 41:533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K, Dazio A (2012) Quasi-static cyclic tests on masonry spandrels. Earthq Spectra 28(3):907–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binici B, Yakut A, Ozcebe G, Erenler A (2015) Provisions for the seismic risk evaluation of existing RC buildings in Turkey under Urban Renewal Law. Earthq Spectra 31(3):1353–1370

  • Dolce M (1989) Models for in-plane loading of masonry walls, Corso sul consolidamento degli edifice in muratura in zona sismica, Ordine degli Ingegneri, Potenza

  • ElGawady M, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2005) In-plane seismic response of URM walls upgraded with FRP. J Compos Constr ASCE 9:524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 6 (2005) design of masonry structures, part 1-1: general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA

  • Franklin S, Lynch J, Abrams D (2001) Performance of rehabilitated URM shear walls: flexural behavior of piers, ST6 Project Final Report, Mid-America Earthquake Center Publication, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Illinois, USA

  • Ganz HR, Thurlimann B (1982) Versuche über die Festigkeit von Zweiachsig beanspruchtem Mauerwerk. Bericht Nr. 7502-3, Institut Fur Baustatik und Konstruktion ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (in German)

  • Guidelines for the Assessment of Buildings under High Risk (GABHR) (2013) Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Government of Republic of Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Hsiao FP, Hwang SJ (2007) In-situ tests of buildings in Rei-Pu Elementary School, NCREE Research Programs and Accomplishments, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, 5–8

  • Hsiao FP, Chiou TC, Hwang SJ, Chiou YJ (2008) Field test of RC school buildings applying seismic retrofit and evaluation, NCREE Research Programs and Accomplishments, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, 9–12

  • Magenes G, Calvi GM (1997) In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1091–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G, Kingsley GR, Calvi GM (1995) Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story masonry building: test procedure and measured experimental response, experimental and numerical investigation on a brick masonry building prototype. Report No: 3.0, Gruppo Nazionale La Difesa Dai Terremoti, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

  • Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MEU) (2012) The Urban Renewal Law for regions under disaster risk, Law No: 6306, Official Gazette: Date, 28(309), Volume 52, Turkey

  • Moon FL (2004) Seismic strengthening of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures with flexible diaphragms. PhD Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

  • Nasser AA (2013) Effect of plastering on clay brick masonry behavior using Taguchi method. Int J Multidiscip Curr Res 1:174–179

  • Paquette J, Bruneau M (2003) Pseudo-dynamic testing of unreinforced masonry building with flexible diaphragm. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 129(6):708–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Gamble WL (2000) Reinforced concrete slabs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell AP, Elwood KJ, Ingham JM (2014) Lateral force–displacement response of unreinforced masonry wall with flanges. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 140(4):04013087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzada K, Khan AN, Elnashai AS, Ashraf M, Javed M, Naseer A, Alam B (2012) Experimental seismic performance evaluation of unreinforced brick masonry buildings. Earthq Spectra 28(3):1269–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih CT, Chu SY, Liou YW, Hsiao FP, Huang CC, Chiou TC, Chiou YC (2014) In situ test of school buildings retrofitted with external steel-framing systems. J Struct Eng ASCE 141:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Specification for the Buildings to be Built in Disaster Areas (2007) Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara

  • USAASCE/SEI 41-13 (2013) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, USA

  • Website of Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MEU) (2015). http://www.csb.gov.tr/projeler/alo181/index.php?Sayfa=haberdetay&Id=11980. Accessed 15 June 2015

  • Yi T (2004) Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of an unreinforced masonry structure with flexible diaphragms. PhD Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Directorate of Infrastructure and Urban Renewal for conducting this study. The second author acknowledges the support from TUBA-GEBIP for continuing research endeavors. The contributions of Baran Çobanoğlu, Salim Azak and METU Structural Mechanics Laboratory workers Osman Keskin, Murat Demirel and Barış Esen during the site and laboratory work are also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper Aldemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldemir, A., Binici, B., Canbay, E. et al. Lateral load testing of an existing two story masonry building up to near collapse. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 3365–3383 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9821-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9821-3

Keywords

Navigation