Abstract
The paper deals with the experimental research and theoretical and numerical analysis on panels made with the construction technology known as Large Lightly Reinforced Concrete Walls–Wood Blocks System (LLRCW–WBS). The results of a series of experimental tests performed on real scale panels subjected to vertical load and cyclic horizontal actions on their plane are presented. Theoretical and numerical analysis have been carried out to understand the experimental results and providing calculation models suitable for the seismic design of LLRCW–WBS panels. Theoretical procedures and numerical models allow to determine the main mechanical parameters characterizing the seismic capacity of the panels, that are strength, deformation capacity, dissipative capacity and collapse modes. Results from theoretical and numerical analysis show a good correspondence with experimental results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ATC 40 Applied Technology Council (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report ATC 40, Redwood City
Comodini F, Fulco A, Mezzi M (2013) Results and analytical simulation of axial and diagonal compression tests on reinforced concrete panels cast with wood blocks system. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9566-9
Comodini F, Fulco A, Mezzi M (2014) Experimental vertical compression tests on reinforced concrete panels made with wood blocks system and theoretical evaluation of critical load. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9653-6
Council Directive 89/106/EEC (2011) Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products
De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2008) A review of research on seismic behavior of irregular building structures since 2002. Bull Earthq Eng 6(2):285–308
EC8 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
EOTA (2002) ETAG 09: non load-bearing permanent shuttering kits/systems based on hollow blocks or panels of insulating materials and sometimes concrete. Brussels
Fajfar P, Duhovnik J, Reflak J, Fishinger M, Breska Z (1981) The behavior of buildings and other structure during the earthquakes of 1979 in Montenegro. Ikpir publication no. 19A, University of Lubljana
FEMA 273 (1997) Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Gasparini G, Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Ceccoli C, Malavolta D (2008) Results of pseudo-static tests with cyclic horizontal load on RC panels made with wood-concrete caisson blocks. In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing
Hamid NH, Mander JB (2010) Lateral seismic performance of multipanel precast hollowcore walls. J Struct Eng ASCE 136(7):795–804. doi:10.1061/(Asce)St.1943-541x.0000183
Holden T, Restrepo J, Mander JB (2003) Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(3):286–296. doi:10.1061/(Asce)0733-9445
Linee guida CSLP (2011) GU Repubblica Italiana, Consiglio Superiore dei lavori pubblici parere n.117, Linee guida per sistemi costruttivi a pannelli portanti basati sull’impiego di blocchi cassero e calcestruzzo debolmente armato e gettato in opera
Magliulo G, Pentangelo V, Maddaloni G, Capozzi V, Petrone C, Lopez P, Talamonti R, Manfredi G (2012a) Shake table tests for seismic assessment of suspended continuous ceilings. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1819–1832. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9383-6
Magliulo G, Petrone C, Capozzi V, Maddaloni G, Lopez P, Talamonti R, Manfredi G (2012b) Shake table tests on infill plasterboard partitions. Open Constr Build Technol J 6(Suppl1–M10):155–163. doi:10.2174/1874836801206010155
Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2013) Emilia earthquake: the seismic performance of precast RC buildings. Online Early Earthq Spectra. doi:10.1193/091012EQS285M
Moroni MO (2002) Concrete shear wall construction. World Housing Encyclopedia. http://www.world-housing.net/uploads/concrete_shear_wall.pdf
Newmark NM, Hall WJ (1982) Earthquake Spectra and Design. EERI Monograph, EERI, Oakland
NTC (2008) GU Repubblica Italiana, Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni D.M. 14 gennaio 2008
Orackal K, Massone L, Wallace J (2009) Shear strength of lightly reinforced wall piers and spandrels. ACI Struct J 106(4):455–465
Paulay T, Park R (1975) Shear walls having rectangular cross section. In: Reinforced concrete structures. Wiley, New York, chap 12.2.2, pp 618–619
Priestley M, Paulay T (1992) Structural wall system. In: Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York, chap 5.2, pp 363–376
Raynsford N (1999) The UK’s approach to sustainable development in construction. Build Res Inf 27(6):419–423. doi:10.1080/096132199369273
Rejec K, Isakovi´c T, Fischinger M (2012) Seismic shear force magnification in RC cantilever structural walls, designed according to Eurocode 8. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):567–586. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9294-y
Ricci I, Palermo M, Gasparini G, Silvestri S, Trombetti T (2013) Results of pseudo-static tests with cyclic horizontal load on cast in situ sandwich squat concrete walls. Eng Struct 54:131–149. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.046
SAP2000 NL (1995) Computer and structure Inc., University Ave, Berkeley, CA
SAP2000 NL (2014) Computer and structure Inc., University Ave, Berkeley, CA
Scotta R (2010) Pareti strutturali in legno cemento. Costruzioni ecosostenibile, Belluno, Convegno
UNI-EN 12369-2 (2004) Wood-based panels. Characteristic values for structural design
Wood S, Greer W (1991) Collapse of eight-story rc building during 1985 Chile earthquake. J Struct Eng 117(2):600–619
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comodini, F., Fulco, A. & Mezzi, M. Experimental, analytical and numerical analysis of the seismic behavior of Large Lightly R/C Walls cast with Wood Blocks System. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 3471–3491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9766-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9766-6