Skip to main content
Log in

Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current design approaches consider cladding panels (CPs) in precast RC buildings as non-structural elements not interacting with the frame. Frame/CP connections are typically designed only for wind or seismic actions perpendicular to the panel plane; unrestrained displacements in the panel plane are presumed. Past seismic events have clearly demonstrated the inadequacy of this design approach. CPs do in fact interact with the frame, modifying the response of buildings subjected to seismic action. This means that substantial and unexpected forces act on the connections and may lead to connection failure. Evidence of such out-of-plane forces in joints arising in buildings with deformable roof diaphragms is given here. This work proposes using CPs as structural elements to enhance the seismic performance of framed industrial buildings. If the friction acting between the panels is taken into account, CP walls become part of the resisting structure, leading to a dual frame/wall system. This concept can be used both in the design of new buildings and the retrofitting of existing ones. The case study reported here was conducted with CPs arranged horizontally and with pinned connections. We show that the results are highly sensitive to the assumed friction coefficient, and also that they differ substantially from analytical design values obtained disregarding friction effects. Friction between panels is known to be unpredictable, especially when structures are subjected to seismic movement with a strong vertical component. The consequence is that forces and displacements in framed buildings are random in a way which cannot be accepted in structural design. This work therefore proposes control of friction magnitude with suitable devices between panels: CPs can act as resistant and dissipative shear walls in industrial buildings, and are effective and relatively low-cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013a) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1061–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013b) Azione diaframma in strutture prefabbricate con pannelli di parete. In: Proceedings of XV convegno ANIDIS. L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Padova:digilab, July, 2013

  • CEN-EN-1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo A, Toniolo G (2012a) Precast concrete structures: the lesson learnt from L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concr J FIB 13(2):71–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo A, Toniolo G (2012b) Problems of seismic design of the cladding panels of precast buildings. In: New Zealand society for earthquake engineering (NZSEE) annual conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, Apr 13–15

  • Craig J, Goodno BJ, Pinelli J, Moor C (1992) Modeling and evaluation of ductile cladding connection systems for seismic response attenuation in buildings. In: 10th World conference on earthquake engineering (10WCEE), vol 7. Madrid, July 19–24, pp 4183–4188

  • Dal Lago B, Lamperti Tornaghi M., Dal Lago A. (2012) Studio sul comportamento bidirezionale di connessioni meccaniche scorrevoli pannello-telaio. In: Proceedings of XIX convegno CTE, Bologna, November

  • Dolce M, Cardone D, Croatto F (2005) Frictional behavior of steel–PTFE interfaces for seismic isolation. Bull Earthq Eng 3:75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara L, Felicetti R, Toniolo G, Zenti C (2011) Friction dissipative devices for cladding panels in precast buildings. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 15(9):1319–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini D, Vanmarcke EH (1976) SIMQKE: a program for artificial motion generation. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • GCR Nist 96–681 (1995) Literature review on seismic performance of building cladding systems. National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Department of Commerce, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodno BJ, Palsson H (1986) Analytical studies of building cladding. J Struct Eng. 112(4)

  • Henry RM, Roll F (1986) Cladding–frame interaction. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(4):815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal A, Pampanin S, Buchanan A, Palermo A (2007) Improved seismic performance of LVL post-tensioned walls coupled with UFP devices. In: 8th Pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Singapore, Dec 5–7

  • Menegotto M (2009) Observations on precast concrete structures of industrial buildings and warehouses. In: Progettazione sismica 3:149–153 (Special issue on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake)

  • Midas Gen ver 741 (2008) release No 2, Copyright 1989–2007. MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd

  • Palsson H, Goodno BJ, Graig JI, Will KM (1984) Cladding influence on dynamics response of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12(2):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli J-P, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (1995) Energy-based seismic design of ductile cladding systems. J Struct Eng 121(3):567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli J-P, Moor C, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (1996) Testing of energy dissipating cladding connections. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz AE, Magana RA, Trados MK, HuoX (1994) Experimental study of joint connections in precast concrete walls. In: 5th US National conference on earthquake engineering, Chicago, July 10–14

  • Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquake. ASCE J Struct Div 96(12):2557–2573

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the company Antonio Basso S.p.A. The contribution by Luigi Casarin and Andrea Della Via, whom conducted some of the presented numerical analyses, is also acknowledged. This study has been developed within the scope of the FSE Project “Study of new systems for seismic improvement of existing precast buildings” supported by Regione Veneto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo De Stefani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scotta, R., De Stefani, L. & Vitaliani, R. Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 3527–3552 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9763-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9763-9

Keywords

Navigation