Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic assessment of a real RC asymmetric hospital building according to NTC 2008 analysis methods

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seismic assessment of existing buildings is an essential issue of seismic engineering. This work is focused on the evaluation of the seismic performance of existing RC buildings according to the current Italian Technical Code, which almost coincides with the European Eurocode 8. Alternative types of analyses, all consistent to the Code provisions, have been performed with reference to a case-study, that is a real RC hospital building. An accurate knowledge of the building has been achieved, as a result of a collaboration between the University of Florence and the Regional Government. Both elastic and inelastic modeling, as well as static and dynamic ones, have been adopted in the analysis. The global response—with special attention to torsional effects—and the seismic performance of each single member have been found with all the performed analyses. The comparison among the analyses has been performed in terms of both global and local response parameters, and the reliability of each analysis has been pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnastopoulos SA, Alexopoulou C, Kyrkos MT (2010) An answer to an important controversy and the need for caution when using simple models to predict inelastic earthquake response of buildings with torsion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(5):521–540

  • Anagnastopoulos SA, Kyrkos MT, Stathopoulos KG (2013) Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of art. In: Proceedings of the ASEM13, Jeju Korea

  • Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2012) Corrective eccentricities for assessment by nonlinear static analysis method of 3D structures subjected to bidirectional ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012(41):1751–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco M, Marino E, Rossi PP (2013) An analytical method for the evaluation of the in-plan irregularity of non-regularly asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9438-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Causevic M, Mitrovic S (2010) Comparison between the non-linear dynamic and static analysis of structures according to European and US provisions. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofaro MT (2009) Metodi di valutazione della resistenza a compressione del calcestruzzo di strutture in c.a. esistenti. PhD Dissertation, Università di Firenze (in Italian)

  • Cristofaro MT, Pucinotti R, Tanganelli M, De Stefano M (2015) The dispersion of concrete compressive strength of existing buildings. Computational methods, seismic protection, hybrid testing and resilience in earthquake engineering. In: Cimellaro GP et al (eds) Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 33. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06394-2_16

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2013) The effect of common irregularities on the seismic performance of existing RC framed buildings. Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures. In: Lavan O, De Stefano M (eds) Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 24. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_4

  • De Luca F, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2011) La verifica di edifici esistenti in cemento armato: criticità dell’attuale approccio normativo italiano. 26° convegno nazionale. AICAP, Padova

  • De Stefano M, Mariani V (2014) Pushover analysis for plan irregular building structures, In: Perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology, series: geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, Ansal A. Ed. No. 34, pp 429–448. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_13

  • De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2008) A review of research on seismic behaviour of irregular building structures since 2002. Bull Earthq Eng 6:285–308. ISSN:1570-761X

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2013a) On the variability of concrete strength as a source of irregularity in elevation for existing RC buildings: a case study. Bull Earthq Eng 11(5):1711–1726. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9463-2, ISSN: 1573–1456

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2013b) Effect of the variability in plan of concrete mechanical properties on the seismic response of existing RC framed structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11(4):1049–1060. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9412-5, ISSN: 1573–1456

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2014) Variability in concrete mechanical properties as a source of in-plan irregularity for existing RC framed structures. Eng Struct 59:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2015) Torsional effects due to concrete strength variability in existing buildings. Earthq Struct 8(2):379–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Leo A, Pascale G (1994) Prove non distruttive sulle costruzioni in cemento armato. Atti del Convegno Sistema Qualità e Prove non Distruttive per l’affidabilità e la sicurezza delle strutture civili. Bologna SAIE, Italia

  • EC2 (2003) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures. European standard EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

  • EC8 (2005) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, European standard EN 1998. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

  • Fajfar P, Marusic D, Perus I (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. J Earthq Eng 9(6):831–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašparik J (1992) Prove non distruttive nell’edilizia. Quaderno didattico A.I.P.N.D, Brescia

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacchetti R, Lacquaniti L (1980) Controlli non distruttivi su impalcati da ponte in calcestruzzo armato, Nota tecnica 04. Università degli Studi di Ancona, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Istituto di Scienza e Tecnica delle Costruzioni, Italia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gűnay MS, Sucuoğlu H (2010) An improvement to linear-elastic procedures for seismic performance assessment. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:907–931. doi:10.1002/eqe.980

    Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2009a) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8:339–362. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2009b) Spettri, Accelerogrammi e le Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Progettazione Sismica I(1):33–50

  • Itaca (2008) Database of the Italian strong motions data. http://itaca.mi.ingv.it

  • Legge 2/2/1974 n. 64 (1974) Provvedimenti per le costruzioni con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche. G.U. del 21/04/1974

  • Legge 5/11/1971 n. 1086 (1971) Norme per la disciplina delle opere in conglomerato cementizio armato, normale e precompresso ed a struttura metallica. G.U. 321 del 21/12/1971

  • Masi A (2005) La stima della resistenza del calcestruzzo in situ mediante prove distruttive e non distruttive. Il Giornale delle Prove Non Distruttive, Monitoraggio

    Google Scholar 

  • Masi A (2008) Analisi di dati sperimentali per la stima degli effetti dell’estrazione sulla resistenza di carote prelevate da strutture in c.a. In: Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Monti G (eds) Proceedings of the Reluis2Rm08 “Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in c.a.”, Roma, 29–30 Maggio, Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher, ISBN 978-88-7699-129-5

  • Masi A, Vona M, Manfredi V (2008) A parametric study on RC existing buildings to compare different analysis methods considered in the European seismic code (EC8-3). In: Proceedings of the 14th WCEE, Beijing, China

  • Min LL PP (2009) CIRCOLARE 2 febbraio 2009, n. 617 Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle «Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni» di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008. G.U. n. 47 del 26/02/2009, Supplemento Ordinario n. 27 (in Italian)

  • NTC (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. D.M. Ministero Infrastrutture e Trasporti 14 gennaio 2008, G.U.R.I. 4 Febbraio 2008, Roma (in Italian)

  • Palmer D (1981) An Introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Geophysics 46(11):1508–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruš I, Fajfar P (2005) On the inelastic torsional response of single-story structures under bi-axial excitation. Earthq. Eng Struct Dyn 34:931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP2000 Advanced (2009) Version 14.0.0, Structural analysis program. Analysis reference manual. Computer and Structures, Inc. Berkley, CA, USA

  • Sirles C, Viksne A (1990) Site-specific shear wave velocity determinations for geotechnical engineering applications. Geotech Environ Geophys Soc Expl Geophys 3:121–131

  • Smerzini C, Galasso C, Iervolino I, Paolucci R (2013) Ground motion record selection based on broadband spectral compatibility. Earthquake Spectra. doi:10.1193/052312EQS197M

  • Tanganelli M, Viti S, De Stefano M, Reinhorn A (2013) Influence of infill panels on the seismic response of existing RC buildings: a case study. Seism Behav Des Irregul Complex Civil Struct 119–133. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_4

  • UNI EN ISO 6892-1 (2009) Materiali metallici—Prova di trazione—Parte 1: Metodo di prova a temperatura ambiente

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the project DPC-ReLUIS 2010/2013 Task 1.1.2. “Strutture in cemento armato ordinarie e prefabbricate”. The Authors also wish to thank the Government of Regione Toscana for providing the building database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture (DiDA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    A. La Brusco, M. Tanganelli, S. Viti & M. De Stefano

  2. Department of Structural Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    V. Mariani

Authors
  1. A. La Brusco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Mariani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Tanganelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Viti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. De Stefano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Viti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

La Brusco, A., Mariani, V., Tanganelli, M. et al. Seismic assessment of a real RC asymmetric hospital building according to NTC 2008 analysis methods. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 2973–2994 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9758-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9758-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation