Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development and application of a real-time loss estimation framework for Portugal

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Portugal has its past marked by the occurrence of very destructive earthquakes. In the well-known 1755 Lisbon earthquake, more than 50 % of the building stock was heavily damaged or destroyed and about 10 % of the population in Lisbon perished. In the beginning of the last century, a moderate event of magnitude 6.0 Mw struck the village of Benavente, causing 46 fatalities and damaging more than 3000 dwellings. The Portuguese building stock in highly populated centres is characterized by a large fraction of masonry buildings, which typically have a higher seismic vulnerability. For these reasons, it is clear that a reliable and accurate platform for damage estimation based on deterministic earthquake scenarios is fundamental, in order to create adequate post-disaster response plans, or to understand which structure types are contributing to the human and economic losses. This study provides an overview of the initial development of this framework for Portugal, as well as a description of the components and input models required for the generation of the seismic input and estimation of damage. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of the platform, two seismic events were considered to assess structural damage throughout mainland Portugal. This framework has been established at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto. It allows earthquake engineers and seismic risk modelers to access damage information and to launch calculations of losses for scenario events. The products can also be of interest to experts and decision makers, who may wish to consider specific types of outputs such as the distribution of building damage, fatalities and the number of homeless.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkar S, Bommer J (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Akinci A, Cultrera G, Erdik M, Pessina V, Tonuk G, Ameri G (2009) Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATC-13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Report ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson G, Boore D (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):2181–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basili R, Kastelic V, Demircioglu M, Garcia Moreno D, Nemser E S, Petricca P, Sboras S P, Besana-Ostman G M, Cabral J, Camelbeeck T, Caputo R, Danciu L, Domac H, Fonseca J, García-Mayordomo J, Giardini D, Glavatovic B, Gulen L, Ince Y, Pavlides S, Sesetyan K, Tarabusi G, Tiberti M, Utkucu M, Valensise G, Vanneste K, Vilanova S, Wössner J (2013). The European Database of Seismogenic Faults (EDSF) compiled in the framework of the Project SHARE. Technical Report, WP 3. doi:10.6092/INGV.IT-SHARE-EDSF

  • Bendimerad F (2001) Loss estimation: a powerful tool for risk assessment and mitigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21(5):467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2004) NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2003 edition (FEMA 450). Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC, USA

  • Cabral J, Moniz C, Batilo J, Figueiredo P, Carvalho J, Matias L, Teves-Costa P, Dias R, Simão N (2013) The 1909 Benavente (Portugal) earthquake: search for the source. Nat Hazards 69(2):1211–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Costa A, Sousa M, Carvalho A, Coelho E (2010) Evaluation of seismic risk and mitigation strategies for the existing building stock: application of LNECLoss to the metropolitan area of Lisbon. Bull Earthq Eng 8:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho EC, Coelho E, Campos-Costa A, Sousa M, Candeias P (2002) Vulnerability evaluation of residential buildings in Portugal. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London, UK

  • Carvalho J, Dias R, Pinto C, Leote J, Mendes-Victor L (2008a) A soil classification for seismic hazard assessment and mitigation of the Algarve. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  • Carvalho A, Zonno G, Franceschina G, Bilé Serra J, Campos Costa A (2008b) Earthquake shaking scenarios for the metropolitan area of Lisbon. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(5):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho J, Torres L, Castro R, Dias R, Mendes-Victor L (2009) Seismic velocities and geotechnical data applied to the soil microzoning of Western Algarve, Portugal. J Appl Geophys 68:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004a) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004b) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Choffat P (1912) Le tremblement de terre du 23 Avril 1909 dans le Ribatejo. Revista de Obras Públicas e Minas, Tomo XLIII, Imprensa Nacional, Lisboa (in French)

  • Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Silva V (2013) OpenQuake Engine Book: Risk v1.0.0. GEM Foundation, Pavia

  • Crowley H, Bommer J, Pinho R, Bird J (2005) The impact of epistemic uncertainty on an earthquake loss model. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1653–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S, Scherbaum F, Danciu L, Beauval C, Drouet S, Douglas J, Basili R, Sandikkaya MA, Segou M, Faccioli E, Theodoulidis N (2012) Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol 16(3):451–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS. Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Buildings Sciences, Washington

  • França JA (1989) Lisboa: urbanismo e arquitectura. Instituto de Cultura e Língua Portuguesa, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S (2004) Review of the development of the capacity spectrum method. ISET J Earthq Technol 41(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini P, Cua G (2012) Procedures for real-time earthquake risk reduction of industrial plants and infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon

  • Grunthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale, vol 15. Chaiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunthal G, Wahlstrom R (2012) The European Mediterranean earthquake catalogue (EMEC) for the last millennium. J Seismol 16(3):535–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH, Heaton TH (1983) Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6):1153–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal K, Wald D (2010) Development of a semi-empirical loss model within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) System. In: Proceedings of the 9th US and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Toronto, Canada

  • Jaiswal K, Wald D (2013) Estimating economic losses from earthquakes using an empirical approach. Earthq Spectra 29(1):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram N, Baker JW (2010) Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(15):1687–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji C, Wald D, Helmberger D (2002) Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake; part I: wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(4):1192–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes-Victor LA, Oliveira CS, Pais I, Teves-Costa P (1994) Earthquake damage scenarios in Lisbon for disaster preparedness. In: Tucker BE, Erdik M, Hwang CN (eds) Issues in urban earthquake risk. NATO ASI series E, Applied Science, vol 271. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 265–289

  • Narciso J, Vilanova S, Lopes I, Oliveira C, Carvalho J, Pinto C, Borges J, Nemser E (2012) Developing a site-conditions map for seismic hazard assessment in Portugal. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Narciso J, Vilanova S, Carvalho J, Pinto C, Lopes I, Nemser E, Oliveira C, Borges J (2013) Site-condition map for Portugal based on Vs30 values and evaluation of the applicability of Vs30 proxies. In: Proceedings of the European geosciences union assembly, Vienna, Austria

  • Oliveira C (1988) “Distribuição dos danos ocorridos em Lisboa aquando dos principais sismos históricos”. Protecção Civil, vol 1, no 4, September, Serviço Nacional de Protecção Civil. Lisbon, Portugal (in portuguese)

  • Oliveira C (2004) The influence of scale on microzonation and impact studies. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation, chapter 2. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 27–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira C (2008) Lisbon earthquake scenarios: a review on uncertainties, from earthquake source to vulnerability modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28:890–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira C, Roca A, Goula X (eds) (2006) Assessing and managing earthquake risk: geo-scientific and engineering knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation—development tools, techniques. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H, Silva V, Henshaw P, Butler L, Nastasi M, Panzeri L, Simionato M, Vigano D (2014) OpenQuake-engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85(3):692–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelaez J, Casado C (2002) Seismic hazard estimate at the Iberian Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2699–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proença J, Oliveira C, Almeida J (2004) Performance-Based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete structures with Masonry infilled panels: the case of block number 22 of the Santa Maria Hospital in Lisbon. ISET J Earthq Technol 41:233–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva V, Crowley H, Varum H, Pinho R (2014a) Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng 13(2):429–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva V, Crowley H, Varum H, Pinho R (2014b) Investigation of the characteristics of Portuguese regular moment-frame RC buildings and development of a vulnerability model. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9669-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva V, Crowley H, Pagani M, Monelli D, Pinho R (2014c) Development of the OpenQuake engine, the Global Earthquake Model’s open-source software for seismic risk assessment. Nat Hazards 72(3):1409–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa M (2006) Risco sísmico em Portugal continenal. PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Sousa M, Oliveira C (1997) Hazard assessment based on macroseismic data considering the influence of geological conditions. Nat Hazards 14:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence R (ed) (2007) Earthquake disaster scenario prediction and loss modelling for urban areas. IUSS Press, Pavia. ISBN 978-88-6198-011-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford P, Strasser F, Bommer J (2008) An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region. Bull Earthq Eng 6(2):149–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Javanbarg M, Di Alessandro C, Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson N, Boore D, Campbell K, Delavaud E, Erdik M, Stafford P (2013) Selection of a global set of ground motion prediction equations. PEER Report 2013/22, Berkeley, USA

  • Stucchi M, Rovida A, Gomez Capera AA, Alexandre P, Camelbeeck T, Demircioglu MB, Gasperini P, Kouskouna V, Musson RMW, Radulian M, Sesetyan K, Vilanova S, Baumont D, Bungum H, Fäh D, Lenhardt W, Makropoulos K, Martinez Solares JM, Scotti O, Živčić M, Albini P, Batllo J, Papaioannou C, Tatevossian R, Locati M, Meletti C, Viganò D, Giardini D (2012). The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899. J Seismol

  • Vilanova S, Fonseca J (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment for Portugal. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1702–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilanova S, Fonseca J, Oliveira C (2012) Ground-motion for seismic hazard assessment in Western Iberia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, DJ, Lin K, Quitoriano V (2008) Quantifying and qualifying ShakeMap uncertainty. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1238

  • Wald D, Allen T (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1379–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill GA, Silva V, Crowley H, Bazzurro P (2014) Exploring the impact of spatial correlations and uncertainties for portfolio analysis in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9730-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills C, Clahan B (2006) Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1483–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden CB, Wald DJ, Lin K, Cua G, Garcia D (2010) A revised ground-motion and intensity interpolation scheme for ShakeMap. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 100:3083–3096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M (2004) Real time prediction of earthquake casualties. In: Malzahn D, Plapp T (eds) Disasters and society-from hazard assessment to risk reduction. Logos, Berlin, pp 165–173

    Google Scholar 

Web references

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Joao Carvalho from the National Laboratory of Energy and Geology (LNEG), Dr. Alexandra Carvalho from the National Laboratory of Civil Engineering (LNEC) and Dr. Susana Vilanova from the Instituto Superior Tecnico (IST) for their valuable contribution on the development of the site conditions model. The Authors are also grateful for the unconditional support of Dr. Fernando Carrilho from the Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), regarding the use of the Portuguese Seismographic Network. The numerous recommendations from Dr. Graeme Weatherill, Dr. Helen Crowley and Dr. Rui Pinho from the EUCENTRE, and Engineer José Oliveira from the Portuguese Civil Protection, were also fundamental in the development of the platform presented herein. Finally, the Authors are also grateful for the suggestions of the two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Vitor Silva

  2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Mário Marques, José Miguel Castro & Humberto Varum

Authors
  1. Vitor Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mário Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Miguel Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Humberto Varum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitor Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, V., Marques, M., Castro, J.M. et al. Development and application of a real-time loss estimation framework for Portugal. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 2493–2516 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9743-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9743-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation