Skip to main content
Log in

A novel shell element for nonlinear pushover analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a procedure for the assessment of reinforced concrete structures in terms of seismic capacity based on the nonlinear pushover method. Structural systems containing shear walls are dealt with by adopting a newly developed reinforced shell element in which arbitrary distributions of steel reinforcement and nonlinear material behavior for both concrete and re-bars are considered. Stand-alone structural walls and a full-scale 3D building with shear walls placed along two directions are analyzed. Numerical simulations are presented that demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed approach in obtaining limit loads and failure mechanisms at an affordable computational cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Association Française de Normalisation (2001) Règles de construction parasismique PS applicables aux bâtiments, dites Règles PS 92 (Norme P 06–013), amendement A1: 01/02/2001. Tech. rep., AFNOR

  • Berto L, Vitaliani R, Saetta A, Simioni P (2009) Seismic assessment of existing RC structures affected by degradation phenomena. Struct Saf 31(4):284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R (1987) Computation of post-bifurcation and post-failure behavior of strain-softening solids. Comput Struct 25(2):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAST3M (2013) User manual. Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, available from: http://www-cast3m.cea.fr/. Accessed on May 2014

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:903–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combescure D, Sollogoub P (2004) Rapport DM2S (SEMT/EMSI/RT/02-047/C) IAEA CRP-NFE Camus Benchmark—Experimental results and specifications to the participants. Tech. rep., CEA, Direction de l’Energie Nucléaire

  • Combescure D, Sollogoub P, Ile N, Reynouard JM, Nazé PA (2001) Camus III international benchmark—synthesis of the participant reports. Tech. rep., CEA, Direction de l’Energie Nucléaire, http://www-tamaris.cea.fr/media/resultats/CAMUS3/BenchmarkCamus3. Accessed on July 2014

  • Cosenza E, Maddaloni G, Magliulo G, Pecce M, Ramasco R (2005) Il Progetto Antisismico di Edifici in Cemento Armato. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorkin E, Bathe K (1984) A continuum mechanics based four-node shell element for general non-linear analysis. Eng Comput 1:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12(1):51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS (2002) Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis? J Earthq Eng 6(1):123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1992-1-1 (2004) Eurocode 2—design of concrete structures—part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. Tech. rep, European Committee for Standardization

  • Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2006) Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. J Struct Eng 132(11):1721–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent D, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div 97(ST7):1964–1990

  • Kotronis P, Raguenau F, Mazars J (2005) A simplified modelling strategy for R/C walls satisfying PS92 and EC8 design. Eng Struct 27:1197–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawinkler H, Seneviratna G (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6):452–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2010) Seismic evaluation of an existing complex RC building. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):363–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu XZ (2014) A multi-layer shell element for shear walls based on OpenSEES-THUShell. Tsinghua University, available from: http://www.globethesis.com/?t=1102360218461424. Accessed on July 2014

  • Marmo F, Rosati L (2012) Analytical integration of elasto-plastic uniaxial constitutive laws over arbitrary sections. Int J Numer Methods Eng 91(9):990–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmo F, Rosati L (2013) The fiber-free approach in the evaluation of the tangent stiffness matrix for elastoplastic uniaxial constitutive laws. Int J Numer Methods Eng 94(9):868–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulas MG, Coronelli D, Martinelli L (2007a) Multi-scale modelling approach for the pushover analysis of existing RC shear walls part I: model formulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(9):1169–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulas MG, Coronelli D, Martinelli L (2007b) Multi-scale modelling approach for the pushover analysis of existing RC shear walls part II: experimental verification. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(9):1189–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS (2001) Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng Struct 23:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2014) OpenSEES. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (2.4.3). University of California at Berkeley, available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu/. Accessed on May 2014

  • Papanikolaou VK, Elnashai AS (2005) Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis I: methodology. J Earthq Eng 9(6):923–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou VK, Elnashai AS, Pareja JF (2006) Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: comparative results. J Earthq Eng 10(1):127–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott B, Park R, Priestley M (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI J 79(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer F (1996) Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: part I. formulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(7):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RL (2014) FEAP—a finite element analysis program, programmer manual. University of California at Berkeley, available from: http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/feap/. Accessed on May 2014

  • Valoroso N, Marmo F, Sessa S (2014) Limit state analysis of reinforced shear walls. Eng Struct 61:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2007) Study on the performance-based seismic design method for shear wall structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Tongji University, Shanghai

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nunziante Valoroso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valoroso, N., Marmo, F. & Sessa, S. A novel shell element for nonlinear pushover analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 2367–2388 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9724-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9724-3

Keywords

Navigation