Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop modeling strategies to accurately model column behavior under seismic loading, including residual displacement. To this end, seven shaking table tests are considered to evaluate the accuracy of existing modeling approaches in capturing residual displacement, maximum displacement and base shear. It is found that, although the recommended modeling strategies can estimate maximum displacement and maximum base shear with reliable accuracy, but the discrepancy of their results corresponding to residual displacement are unacceptable. Following this, a modified concrete constitute model representing damage accumulation from cyclic loading is implemented for the fiber-element analysis. Analyses using modified concrete constitute model leads to decrease the error of modeling strategies in capturing residual displacement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ATC (1999) FEMA306: evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: basic procedures manual (ATC-43 Project). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun CA, Motahari M, and Luco N (2006) Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. PEER 2006/05. In: technical report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley, California
Berry MP, and Eberhard MO (2008) Performance modeling strategies for modern reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: technical report 2007–07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
CEB (1996) RC frames under earthquake loading: state of the art report, no. 231. European Committee for Concrete, Lausanne
Chang G, and Mander J (1994) Seismic energy-based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part I - evaluation of seismic capacity. In: report no. NCEER-94-0006, Departmentof Civil and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY
Christopoulos C, Pampanin S, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: singledegree of freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):97–118
Dazio A (2004) Residual displacements in capacity designed reinforced concrete structures. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1–6 August 2004
Elwood KJ, Moehle JP (2003) Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames. In: PEER report 2003/01, Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California
Esmaeili-Gh A, Xiao Y (2002) Seismic behavior of bridge columns subjected to various loading patterns. PEER report 2002/12. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California
Fu Q, and Menun C (2006) Residual displacement caused by fault-normal near-field ground motions. In: the 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, California
Hachem MM, Mahin SA, and Moehle JP (2003) Performance of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns under bidirectional earthquake loading. In: technical report 2003–06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
JBDPA (2001) Guidelines for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, Tokyo, Japan
Jeong HIL, Sakai J, Mahin S (2008) Shaking table tests and numerical investigation of self-centering reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: technical report 2008–06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
Lee WK, Billington SL (2010) Modeling residual displacements of concrete bridge columns under earthquake loads using fiber elements. J Bridge Eng 15(3):240–249
MacRae GA, Kawashima K (1997) Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(7):701–716
Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2013) Emilia earthquake: the seismic performance of precast RC buildings. Earthq Spectra 30(2):891–912 May 2014
OpenSees Development Team (2002) Opensees: open system for earthquake engineering simulations. Version 3.4, Berkeley, CA
Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, and Priestley MJN (2002) Residual deformations in the performance-based seismic assessment of frame structures, No. ROSE-2002/02. In: technical report, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part II: multidegree of freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):119–147
Phan V, Saiidi MS, Anderson J, Ghasemi H (2007) Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng 133:982–989
Priestley MJN, Park R (1987) Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. Struct J Am Concr Inst 84(1):61–76
Riddell R, and Newmark NM (1979) Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes. Structural research series No. 468. In: technical report, Department of Civil Engineering, Illinois University, Urbana-Campaign, Illinois
Ruiz-Garcia J, and Miranda E (2005) Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements, No. 153. In: technical report, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, California
Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E (2006) Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(3):315–336
Saiidi MS, Ardekani SM (2012) An analytical study of residual displacements in RC bridge columns subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Bridge Struct 8:35–45
Sakai J, and Unjoh S (2006) Earthquake simulation test of reinforced concrete bridge column under multidirectional loading. In: proceedings of 4th international workshop on seismic design and retrofit of transportation facilities, MCEER, San Francisco, CA
Sakai J, and Mahin S (2004) Mitigation of residual displacements of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: proceedings 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada
Sakai J, Jeong H, and Mahin S (2005) Earthquake simulator tests on the mitigation of residual displacements of reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: proceedings 21st US–Japan bridge engineering workshop, Tsukuba, Japan
Shin YB (2007) Dynamic response of ductile and non-ductile reinforced concrete columns. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Smyrou E, Tasiopoulou P, Bal İE, Gazetas G, and Vintzileou E (2011) Structural and geotechnical aspects of the Christchurch (2011) and Darfield (2010) earthquakes in New Zealand. Seventh national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey
Stanton J, and McNiven H (1979) The development of a mathematical model to predict the flexural response of reinforced concrete beams to cyclic loads, using system identification. In: report no. EERC 79–02, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif
USGS (2011) United States Geological Survey. http://www.usgs.gov/
Wehbe N, Saiidi M, Sanders D (1999) Seismic performance of rectangular bridge columns with moderate confinement. ACI Struct J 96(2):248–259 March-April
Yazgun U (2009) The use of post-earthquake residual displacements as a performance indicator in seismic assessment. DISS. ETH NO. 18645. PhD Dissertation, ETH Zurich University
Yazgan U, Dazio A (2011) Simulating maximum and residual displacements of RC structures: I. Accuracy. Earthquake Spectra 27(4):1187–1202
Zhao J, Sritharan S (2006) Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based seismic analysis of RC bridges. ACI Spring Convention, Charlotte, NC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moshref, A., Tehranizadeh, M. & Khanmohammadi, M. Investigation of the reliability of nonlinear modeling approaches to capture the residual displacements of RC columns under seismic loading. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 2327–2345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9718-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9718-6