Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the reliability of nonlinear modeling approaches to capture the residual displacements of RC columns under seismic loading

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop modeling strategies to accurately model column behavior under seismic loading, including residual displacement. To this end, seven shaking table tests are considered to evaluate the accuracy of existing modeling approaches in capturing residual displacement, maximum displacement and base shear. It is found that, although the recommended modeling strategies can estimate maximum displacement and maximum base shear with reliable accuracy, but the discrepancy of their results corresponding to residual displacement are unacceptable. Following this, a modified concrete constitute model representing damage accumulation from cyclic loading is implemented for the fiber-element analysis. Analyses using modified concrete constitute model leads to decrease the error of modeling strategies in capturing residual displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATC (1999) FEMA306: evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: basic procedures manual (ATC-43 Project). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California

  • Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun CA, Motahari M, and Luco N (2006) Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. PEER 2006/05. In: technical report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Berry MP, and Eberhard MO (2008) Performance modeling strategies for modern reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: technical report 2007–07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • CEB (1996) RC frames under earthquake loading: state of the art report, no. 231. European Committee for Concrete, Lausanne

  • Chang G, and Mander J (1994) Seismic energy-based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part I - evaluation of seismic capacity. In: report no. NCEER-94-0006, Departmentof Civil and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY

  • Christopoulos C, Pampanin S, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: singledegree of freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Dazio A (2004) Residual displacements in capacity designed reinforced concrete structures. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1–6 August 2004

  • Elwood KJ, Moehle JP (2003) Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames. In: PEER report 2003/01, Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California

  • Esmaeili-Gh A, Xiao Y (2002) Seismic behavior of bridge columns subjected to various loading patterns. PEER report 2002/12. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Fu Q, and Menun C (2006) Residual displacement caused by fault-normal near-field ground motions. In: the 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, California

  • Hachem MM, Mahin SA, and Moehle JP (2003) Performance of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns under bidirectional earthquake loading. In: technical report 2003–06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • JBDPA (2001) Guidelines for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong HIL, Sakai J, Mahin S (2008) Shaking table tests and numerical investigation of self-centering reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: technical report 2008–06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • Lee WK, Billington SL (2010) Modeling residual displacements of concrete bridge columns under earthquake loads using fiber elements. J Bridge Eng 15(3):240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae GA, Kawashima K (1997) Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(7):701–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2013) Emilia earthquake: the seismic performance of precast RC buildings. Earthq Spectra 30(2):891–912 May 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenSees Development Team (2002) Opensees: open system for earthquake engineering simulations. Version 3.4, Berkeley, CA

  • Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, and Priestley MJN (2002) Residual deformations in the performance-based seismic assessment of frame structures, No. ROSE-2002/02. In: technical report, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

  • Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part II: multidegree of freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan V, Saiidi MS, Anderson J, Ghasemi H (2007) Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng 133:982–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Park R (1987) Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. Struct J Am Concr Inst 84(1):61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell R, and Newmark NM (1979) Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes. Structural research series No. 468. In: technical report, Department of Civil Engineering, Illinois University, Urbana-Campaign, Illinois

  • Ruiz-Garcia J, and Miranda E (2005) Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements, No. 153. In: technical report, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, California

  • Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E (2006) Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(3):315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi MS, Ardekani SM (2012) An analytical study of residual displacements in RC bridge columns subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Bridge Struct 8:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai J, and Unjoh S (2006) Earthquake simulation test of reinforced concrete bridge column under multidirectional loading. In: proceedings of 4th international workshop on seismic design and retrofit of transportation facilities, MCEER, San Francisco, CA

  • Sakai J, and Mahin S (2004) Mitigation of residual displacements of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: proceedings 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

  • Sakai J, Jeong H, and Mahin S (2005) Earthquake simulator tests on the mitigation of residual displacements of reinforced concrete bridge columns. In: proceedings 21st US–Japan bridge engineering workshop, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Shin YB (2007) Dynamic response of ductile and non-ductile reinforced concrete columns. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

  • Smyrou E, Tasiopoulou P, Bal İE, Gazetas G, and Vintzileou E (2011) Structural and geotechnical aspects of the Christchurch (2011) and Darfield (2010) earthquakes in New Zealand. Seventh national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Stanton J, and McNiven H (1979) The development of a mathematical model to predict the flexural response of reinforced concrete beams to cyclic loads, using system identification. In: report no. EERC 79–02, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif

  • USGS (2011) United States Geological Survey. http://www.usgs.gov/

  • Wehbe N, Saiidi M, Sanders D (1999) Seismic performance of rectangular bridge columns with moderate confinement. ACI Struct J 96(2):248–259 March-April

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazgun U (2009) The use of post-earthquake residual displacements as a performance indicator in seismic assessment. DISS. ETH NO. 18645. PhD Dissertation, ETH Zurich University

  • Yazgan U, Dazio A (2011) Simulating maximum and residual displacements of RC structures: I. Accuracy. Earthquake Spectra 27(4):1187–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Sritharan S (2006) Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based seismic analysis of RC bridges. ACI Spring Convention, Charlotte, NC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Tehranizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moshref, A., Tehranizadeh, M. & Khanmohammadi, M. Investigation of the reliability of nonlinear modeling approaches to capture the residual displacements of RC columns under seismic loading. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 2327–2345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9718-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9718-6

Keywords

Navigation