Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 1051–1071 | Cite as

Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies

  • A. PennaEmail author
Original Research Paper


The seismic performance of stone masonry buildings is known to be generally poor with respect to other structural typologies. However, significant differences can be observed for different architectural configurations, structural details and masonry mechanical properties. In particular, the seismic vulnerability of existing stone masonry structures is often governed by local failure modes, typically consisting of out-of-plane overturning of structural portions or crumbling of outer wythes in multi-leaf walls. In buildings with an adequate masonry quality, an overall behaviour controlled by the in-plane capacity of walls can develop and govern the global failure mode, provided that proper connections between perpendicular walls and between walls and floors are effective in contrasting the activation of early local failures. In these cases, the in-plane stiffness of diaphragms (typically vaults and timber floors/roofs) can play a significant role in coupling the response of the different walls, hence controlling the global building capacity. Recent experimental testing campaigns carried out in different laboratories have focused on several aspects of the seismic response of stone masonry buildings and on the effect of several strengthening techniques. The availability of such experimental results allowed validation and improvement of analysis tools and procedures for the assessment of the seismic capacity of existing stone masonry structures. In order to make them available to all practitioners, the research achievements need to be incorporated in codes and guidelines for the assessment and strengthening of existing stone masonry buildings. The procedures currently proposed in several codes are already based on a rational approach, which starts from the acquisition of an adequate structural knowledge level and allows for using nonlinear analysis procedures. They could straightforwardly include new research findings and practical developments.


Stone masonry Seismic assessment Shaking table tests  Multi-body dynamics Equivalent frame 



This article was inspired by a keynote presentation given at the Vienna Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, within a minisymposium organised by Prof. K. Beyer and Dr. T. Wenk, who are gratefully acknowledged. Parts of the presented work have been developed within the framework of the EUCENTRE Executive Projects 2005-08, 2009-12 and 2012-13, and the Reluis Executive Projects 2006-09 and 2010-13, funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection. Prof. G. Magenes, Dr. A.A. Costa, Dr. A. Galasco, Dr. M. Rota, Dr. I.E. Senaldi and a number of students contributed to the experimental and numerical results presented in this work. The manuscript benefited from the useful suggestions and accurate corrections of two anonymous experts.


  1. Abrams DP (2001) Performance-based engineering concepts for unreinforced masonry building structures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 3:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achs G, Adam C (2012) Rapid seismic evaluation of historic brick-masonry buildings in Vienna (Austria) based on visual screening. Bull Earthq Eng 10:1833–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreotti C, Liberatore D, Sorrentino L (2014) Identifying seismic local collapse mechanisms in unreinforced masonry buildings through 3D laser scanning. Key Eng Mater (in press)Google Scholar
  4. AS3700 (2011) Australian Standard, Masonry StructuresGoogle Scholar
  5. ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2006) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  6. Shawa OA, de Felice G, Mauro A, Sorrentino L (2012) Out-of-plane seismic behaviour of rocking masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(5):949–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM (2002) Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear) in masonry assemblage, ASTM E 519–02. West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  8. Belmouden Y, Lestuzzi P (2009) An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings. Constr Build Mater 23(1):40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benedetti D, Carydis P, Pezzoli P (1998) Shaking table tests on 24 masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27:67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Betti M, Galano L, Vignoli A (2014) Comparative analysis on the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Eng Struct 61:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binda L, Penazzi D, Saisi A (2003) Historic masonry buildings: necessity of a classification of structures and masonries for the adequate choice of analytical models. In: Proceedings of the STRUMAS VI, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Brignola A, Frumento S, Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2008) Identification of shear parameters of masonry panels through the in-situ diagonal compression test. Int J Archit Herit 3:52–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brignola A, Pampanin S, Podestà S (2012) Experimental evaluation of the in-plane stiffness of timber diaphragms. Earthq Spectra 28:1687–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattari S, Resemini S, Lagomarsino S (2008) Modelling of vaults as equivalent diaphragms in 3D seismic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Structural analysis of historic construction. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiostrini S, Galano L, Vignoli A (2003) In situ shear and compression tests in ancient stone masonry walls of Tuscany, Italy. J Test Eval ASTM 31(4):289–303Google Scholar
  16. Corradi M, Borri A, Vignoli A (2003) Experimental study on the determination of strength of masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 17:325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa AA (2012) Seismic assessment of the out-of-plane performance of traditional stone masonry walls. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, PortoGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa AA, Arêde A, Campos Costa A, Penna A, Costa A (2013a) Out-of-plane behaviour of a full scale stone masonry façade. Part 1: specimen and ground motion selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:2081–2095Google Scholar
  19. Costa AA, Arêde A, Campos Costa A, Penna A, Costa A (2013b) Out-of-plane behaviour of a full scale stone masonry façade. Part 2: shaking table tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:2097–2111Google Scholar
  20. Costa AA, Arêde A, Penna A, Costa A (2013c) Free rocking response of a regular stone masonry wall with equivalent block approach: experimental and analytical evaluation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:2297–2319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D’Ayala D, Shi Y (2011) Modeling masonry historic buildings by multi-body dynamics. Int J Archit Herit 5:483–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2003) Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spectra 19(3):479–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Felice G (2011) Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. Int J Archit Herit 5(4–5):466–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Felice G, Giannini R (2001) Out-of-plane seismic resistance of masonry walls. J Earthq Eng 5(2):253–271Google Scholar
  25. Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V (1994) Le Chiese e il Terremoto. LINT, Trieste, Italy (in Italian)Google Scholar
  26. Doherty K, Griffith MC, Lam N, Wilson L (2002) Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(4):833–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dolce M, Ponzo FC, Goretti A, Moroni C, Nigro D, Giordano F, De Canio G, Marnetto R (2008) 3d dynamic tests on 2/3 scale masonry buildings retrofitted with different systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th WCEE, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  28. EN 1998-3 (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings—CEN, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  29. Frocht MM (1931) Recent advances in photoelasticity. Trans ASME 55:135–153Google Scholar
  30. Furtmüller T, Adam C (2011) Numerical modeling of the in-plane behavior of historical brick masonry walls. Acta Mech 221:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A (2006) On the use of pushover analysis for existing masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on earthquake engineering, Geneva (CH)Google Scholar
  32. Galasco A, Magenes G, Penna A, Da Paré M (2010) In-plane cyclic shear tests of undressed double leaf stone masonry panels. In: Proceedings of the 14th ECEE, OhridGoogle Scholar
  33. Giuffrè A (1996) A mechanical model for statics and dynamics of historical masonry buildings. In: Petrini V, Save M (eds) Protection of the architectural heritage against earthquakes. CISM Courses and Lectures no. 359. Springer, Wien, pp 71–152Google Scholar
  34. Giuriani E, Marini A (2008) Wooden roof box structure for the anti-seismic strengthening of historic buildings. Int J Archit Herit 2:226–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graziotti F, Magenes G, Penna A (2012) Experimental cyclic behaviour of stone masonry spandrels. In: Proceedings of the 15th WCEE, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffith MC, Vaculik J, Lam NTK, Wilson J, Lumantarna E (2007) Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(6):801–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffith MC, Magenes G, Melis G, Picchi L (2003) Evaluation of out-of-plane stability of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to seismic excitation. J Earthq Eng 7(1):141–169Google Scholar
  38. Javed M, Naeem Kahn A, Penna A, Magenes G (2006) Behaviour of masonry structures during the Kashmir 2005 earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 1st ECEES, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. Lagomarsino S (2014) Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9609-x
  40. Lagomarsino S, Cattari S (2014) PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures. Bull Earthq Eng (under review)Google Scholar
  41. Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lagomarsino S, Resemini S (2009) The assessment of damage limitation state in the seismic analysis of monumental buildings. Earthq Spectra 25(2):323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lemos JV (2007) Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. Int J Archit Herit 1(2):190–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magenes G (2006) Masonry building design in seismic areas: recent experiences and prospective from a European standpoint. In: Proceedings of the 1st ECEES, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Magenes G, Della Fontana A (1998) Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the British masonry society, no. 8, October 1998, pp 190–195Google Scholar
  46. Magenes G, Penna A (2011) Seismic design and assessment of masonry buildings in Europe: recent research and code development issues. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australasian masonry conference, QueenstownGoogle Scholar
  47. Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A (2010a) A full-scale shaking table test on a two-storey stone masonry building. In: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, pap. No. 1432, OhridGoogle Scholar
  48. Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A, Rota M (2010b) Experimental characterisation of stone masonry mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of the 8th international masonry conference, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  49. Magenes G, Penna A, Senaldi IE, Rota M, Galasco A (2014) Shaking table test of a strengthened full scale stone masonry building with flexible diaphragms. Int J Archit Herit 8(3):349–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mannoni T (2005) Archeologia della produzione architettonica. Le tecniche costruttive, Arqueología de la Arquitectura 4:11–19 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  51. Mazzon N, Valluzzi MR, Aoki T, Garbin E, De Canio G, Ranieri N, Modena C (2009) Shaking table tests on two multi-leaf stone masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th Canadian masonry symposium, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  52. Menon A, Magenes G (2011) Definition of seismic input for out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry: I. Formulation, a II. Parametric study. J Earthq Eng 15(2):165–213Google Scholar
  53. MIT (2009) Circolare del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, n. 617/2009, S.O. No. 27, G.U. No. 47/2009, “Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008”Google Scholar
  54. Mouzakis Ch, Vintzileou E, Adami Ch-E, Karapitta L (2012) Dynamic tests on three leaf stone masonry building model before and after interventions. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on structural analysis of historical construction, WroclawGoogle Scholar
  55. NTC (2008) “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni” D.M. 14 gennaio 2008, S.O. No. 30, G.U. No. 29/2008Google Scholar
  56. NZSEE (2006) New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE): assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes. Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk BuildingsGoogle Scholar
  57. Penelis GG (2006) An efficient approach for pushover analysis of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures. J Earthq Eng 10(3):359–379Google Scholar
  58. Penna A, Lagomarsino S, Galasco A (2014a) A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(2):159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Penna A, Senaldi I, Galasco A, Magenes G (2014b) Numerical simulation of the experimental seismic response of unreinforced stone masonry buildings with stiffened diaphragms and improved wall-to-diaphragm connections. In: Proceedings of the 9th international masonry conference, GuimarãesGoogle Scholar
  60. Restrepo Vélez LF, Magenes G, Griffith MC (2014) Dry stone masonry walls in bending—part I: static tests. Int J Archit Herit 8(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia C, Magenes G (2011) Typological seismic risk maps for Italy. Earthq Spectra 27(3):907–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) A framework for the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1045–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sathiparan N, Sakurai K, Numada M, Meguro K (2013) Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of PP-band strengthening stone masonry houses. Bull Earthq Eng 11:2177–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Senaldi IE, Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A, Rota M (2014) The effect of stiffened floor and roof diaphragms on the experimental seismic response of a full scale unreinforced stone masonry building. J Earthq Eng 18:407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simulia (2008) Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  66. Sorrentino L, Kunnath S, Monti G, Scalora G (2008) Seismically induced one-sided rocking response of unreinforced masonry façades. Eng Struct 30(8):2140–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sorrentino L, AlShawa O, Decanini LD (2011) The relevance of energy damping in unreinforced masonry rocking mechanisms. Experimental and analytic investigations. Bull Earthq Eng 9(5):1617–1642Google Scholar
  68. Sorrentino L, Liberatore L, Decanini LD, Liberatore D (2014) The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9519-3
  69. Tassios TP (2010) Seismic engineering of monuments. Bull Earthq Eng 8:1231–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tomasi R, Baldessari C, Piazza M (2009) The refurbishment of existing timber floors: characterization of the in-plane behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference PROHITECH, RomeGoogle Scholar
  71. Tomaževič M (2011) Seismic resistance of masonry buildings in historic urban and rural nuclei: lessons learned in Slovenia. Int J Archit Herit 5:436–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tomaževič M, Velechovsky T, Weiss P (1992) The effect of interventions in the floor structural system on the seismic resistance of historic stone-masonry buildings: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of the 10th WCEE, MadridGoogle Scholar
  73. Tomaževič M, Lutman M, Weiss P (1996) Seismic upgrading of behaviour of old brick-masonry urban houses: tying of walls with steel ties. Earthq Spectra 12(3):599–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tondelli M, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2012) Evaluation of uncertainties in the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings. J Earthq Eng 16:36–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vaculik J, Griffith MC, Magenes G (2014) Dry stone masonry walls in bending—part II: analysis. Int J Archit Herit 8:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB (2009) Experimental characterization of stone masonry in shear and compression. Constr Build Mater 23:3337–3345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson A, Quenneville PJH, Ingham JM (2014) In-plane orthotropic behavior of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings. J Struct Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000819

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  2. 2.European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake EngineeringPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations