Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of cladding panels on the first period of one-story precast buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the recent severe seismic events, as L’Aquila (2009) and Emilia earthquakes (2012), the collapse of cladding panels system in precast buildings has been frequently observed due to their connection system failure. Such a damage have demonstrated the deficiency of the actual design approach, that considers cladding panels as non-structural elements, neglecting any interaction with the structure under bi-directional and dynamic seismic excitations. This paper investigates the influence of vertical cladding panels on the first vibration period of one-story precast concrete buildings, with floor rigid in its own plane. At this purpose, a bare structural elastic model and an innovative elastic model of the building with cladding system are implemented and a parametric study is performed. The results of the parametric study show a high influence of the panels on the first period of the analyzed buildings, as well as the inadequacy for this typology of buildings of the simplified relationship for computing the fundamental period proposed by some codes. More suitable formulas are proposed to evaluate the first period in a linear static analysis of one-story precast buildings, both in the case of bare buildings and of buildings with cladding system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird A, Diaferia R, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2011a) Parametric investigation of seismic interaction between precast concrete cladding systems and moment resisting frames. Paper presented at the Structures Congress 2011

  • Baird A, Palermo A, Pampanin S (2011) Facade damage assessment of multi-storey buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull N Z Earthq Eng 44(4):368–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Dal Lago B (2013) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11(4):1061–1081. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9418-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998–1. Brussels, Belgium

  • Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M (2011) Fragility analysis and seismic record selection. J Struct Eng 137(3):379–390. doi:10.1061/(Asce)St.1943-541x.0000115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland N, Ghosh SK (2007) Seismic design of precast/prestressed concrete structures. 1st edn. PCI

  • Colombo A, Toniolo G (2010) Problemi di progettazione sismica delle connessioni dei pannelli di tamponamento. In: Diciottesimo congresso del Collegio dei Tecnici della Industrializzazione Edilizia, Brescia, Italy, pp 799–806 (in Italian)

  • CSI (1978–2011) SAP2000 linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis and design of three dimensional structures. CSI Computer & Structures, Berkeley, California

  • D’Ambrisi A, Mezzi M (2005) A probabilistic approach for estimating the seismic response of elasto-plastic SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(14):1737–1753. doi:10.1002/Eqe.509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrisi A, Mezzi M (2009) Probabilistic estimate of seismic response design values of RC frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(15):1709–1727. doi:10.1002/Eqe.925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. M. 14/01/2008 (2008) NormeTecniche per le Costruzioni G.U. n. 29 4 febbraio 2008 (in Italian)

  • Ercolino M, Coppola O, Petrone C, Magliulo G (2012a) Report sui danni registrati a Mirandola (MO) in seguito all’evento sismico del 29 maggio 2012. v. 1.0 edn. (in Italian)

  • Ercolino M, Coppola O, Petrone C, Magliulo G (2012b) Report sui danni registrati a San Felice sul Panaro (MO) in seguito agli eventi sismici del 20 e 29 maggio 2012 v. 1.0 edn.

  • Faggiano B, Iervolino I, Magliulo G, Manfredi G, Vanzi I (2009) Post-event analysis of industrial structures behavior during L’Aquila earthquake. Progettazione sismica 3 (English Special Edition):203–208

  • Foutch DA, Goel SC, Roeder CW (1987) Seismic testing of full-scale steel building. 1. J Struct Eng Asce 113(11):2111–2129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. J Struct Eng Asce 123(11):1454–1461. doi:10.1061/(Asce)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454)

  • Goel RK, Chopra AK (1998) Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings. J Struct Eng Asce 124(4):426–433. doi:10.1061/(Asce)0733-9445(1998)124:4(426)

  • Goodno BJ, Craig JI, Meyyappa M, Palsson H (1983) Cladding-structure interaction in highrise buildings. Georgia Institute of Tech, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodno BJ, Palsson H (1986) Analytical studies of building cladding. J Struct Eng-Asce 112(4):665–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodno BJ, Palsson H, Douglas GP (1984) Localized response and implications for seismic design. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, pp 1143–1150

  • Günaydın E, Topkaya C (2013) Fundamental periods of steel concentrically braced frames designed to Eurocode 8. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(10):1415–1433. doi:10.1002/eqe.2279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry RM, Roll F (1986) Cladding–frame interaction. J Struct Eng Asce 112(4):815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PJ, Stojadinovic B (2010) Seismic performance assessment and probabilistic repair cost analysis of precast concrete cladding systems for multistory buildings. University of California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center CoE

  • Ioannou I, Borg R, Novelli V, Melo J, Alexander D, Kongar I, Verrucci E, Cahill B, Rossetto T (2012) The 29th May 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake. EPICentre Field Observation Report UCL:No. EPI-FO-290512

  • Kramar M, Isakovic T, Fischinger M (2010) Seismic collapse risk of precast industrial buildings with strong connections. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(8):847–868. doi:10.1002/Eqe.970

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Capozzi V, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2011) Neoprene-concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings. Eng Struct 33(2):532–538. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Cimmino M, Capozzi V, Manfredi G (2014a) Numerical evaluation of the strength of beam-to-column dowel connections in precast buildings under monotonic actions. Constr Build Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.036

  • Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2014b) Emilia earthquake: the seismic performance of precast RC buildings earthq spectra 30(2):891–912. doi:10.1193/091012EQS285M

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008) Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 30(9):2580–2588. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F, Fenves GL (2013) OpenSees Manual http://opensees.berkeley.edu. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Accessed 27 Feb 2013

  • Meyyappa M, Palsson H, Craig JI (1981) Modal parameter estimation for a highrise building using ambient response data taken during construction. In: Proceedings of 2nd specialty conference dynamic response structure: experimentation, observation, prediction, and control, Atlanta, Georgia, pp 141–151

  • Osanai Y, Watanabe F, Okamoto S (1996) Stress transfer mechanism of socket base connections with precast concrete columns. ACI Struct J 93(3):266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsson H, Goodno BJ, Craig JI, Will KM (1984) Cladding influence on dynamics response of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12(2):215–228. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290120206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCI (2007) Architectural precast concrete manual committee. West Jackson Blvd C

  • Posada M, Wood SL (2002) Seismic performance of precast industrial buildings in Turkey. In: Proceedings, 7th US national conference on earthquake engineering, earthquake engineering research institute, Boston, MA, p 543

  • Rihal SS (1988) Earthquake resistance and behavior of heavy facades/claddings and connections in medium-rise steel-framed buildings. In: Proceedings of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan 6:207–212

  • Roeder CW, Foutch DA, Goel SC (1987) Seismic testing of full-scale steel building. 2. J Struct Eng Asce 113(11):2130–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo G (2012) SAFECAST project: European research on seismic behaviour of the connections of precast structures. 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal

  • Wang ML (1987) Cladding performance on a full scale test frame. Earthq Spectra 3(1):119–173. doi:10.1193/1.1585423

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection within the national project DPC— ReLUIS 2014. The authors thank Eng. Orsola Coppola for his valuable collaboration in the execution of the numerical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Magliulo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magliulo, G., Ercolino, M. & Manfredi, G. Influence of cladding panels on the first period of one-story precast buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 1531–1555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9657-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9657-2

Keywords

Navigation