Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 2211–2230 | Cite as

The role of site effects in the comparison between code provisions and the near field strong motion of the Emilia 2012 earthquakes

  • Maria Rosaria Gallipoli
  • Leonardo Chiauzzi
  • Tony Alfredo Stabile
  • Marco Mucciarelli
  • Angelo Masi
  • Carmine Lizza
  • Luigi Vignola
Original Research Paper

Abstract

A damaging seismic sequence hit a wide area mainly located in the Emilia-Romagna region (Northern Italy) during 2012 with several events of local magnitude \(\hbox {M}_\mathrm{l} \ge 5\), among which the \(\hbox {M}_\mathrm{l}\) 5.9 May 20 and the \(\hbox {M}_\mathrm{l}\) 5.8 May 29 were the main events. Thanks to the presence of a permanent accelerometric station very close to the epicentre and to the temporary installations performed in the aftermath of the first shock, a large number of strong motion recordings are available, on the basis of which, we compared the recorded signals with the values provided by the current Italian seismic regulations, and we observed several differences with respect to horizontal components when the simplified approach for site conditions (based on Vs30 classes) is used. On the contrary, when using the more accurate approach based on the local seismic response, we generally obtain a much better agreement, at least in the frequency range corresponding to a quarter wavelength comparable with the depth of the available subsoil data. Some unresolved questions still remain, such as the low frequency behaviour (\(<\)1 Hz) that could be due either to complex propagation at depth larger than the one presently investigated or to near source effects, and the behaviour of vertical spectra whose recorded/code difference is too large to be explained with the information currently available.

Keywords

Emilia earthquake Strong motion Site effects  Pseudoacceleration spectrum Housner Intensity 

References

  1. Albarello D, Cesi C, Eulilli V, Guerrini F, Lunedei E, Paolucci E, Pileggi D, Puzzilli LM (2011) The contribution of the ambient vibration prospecting in seismic microzoning: an example from the area damaged by the april 6, 2009 l’aquila (italy) earthquake. Boll Geof Teor Appl 52(3):513–538Google Scholar
  2. Bordoni P, Azzara RM, Cara F, Cogliano R, Cultrera G, Di Giulio G, Fodarella A, Milana G, Pucillo S, Riccio G, Rovelli A, Augliera P, Luzi L, Lovati S, Massa M, Pacor F, Puglia R, Ameri G (2012) Preliminary results from emersito, a rapid response network for site-effect studies. Ann Geophys 55(4):599–607. doi:10.4401/ag-6153 Google Scholar
  3. Chiauzzi L, Masi A, Mucciarelli M, Vona M, Pacor F, Cultrera G, Gallovič F, Emolo A (2012) Building damage scenarios based on exploitation of housner intensity derived from finite faults ground motion simulations. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):517–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowley H, Stucchi M, Meletti C, Calvi GM, Pacor F (2009) Revisiting Italian design code spectra following the L’Aquila earthquake. Progettazione Sismica No 3/2009 Special Issue, IUSS PRESS (ISSN 1973-7432)Google Scholar
  5. Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Oliveto G (2002) Structural and seismological implications of the 1997 seismic sequence in Umbria and Marche, Italy. In: Oliveto G (ed) Innovative approaches to earthquake engineering. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 229–323Google Scholar
  6. Ditommaso R, Mucciarelli M, Gallipoli MR, Ponzo FC (2010) Effect of a single vibrating building on free-field ground motion: numerical and experimental evidences. Bull Earthq Eng 8:693–703. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9134-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galli P, Castenetto S, Peronace E (2012) The MCS macroseismic survey of the Emilia 2012 earthquakes. Ann Geophys 55(4):663–672. doi:10.4401/ag-6163 Google Scholar
  8. Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M (2009) Comparison of site classification from VS30, VS10, and HVSR in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallipoli MR, Bianca M, Mucciarelli M, Parolai S, Picozzi M (2013) Topographic versus stratigraphic amplification: mismatch between code provisions and observations during the L’Aquila (Italy, 2009) sequence. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1325–1336. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9446-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GNDT Working Group (1999) Proposta di riclassificazione sismica del territorio nazionale. Ingegneria Sismica. XVI N.1, gennaio—aprile 1999 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  11. Grimaz S, Malisan P (2013) Epicentral area effects and seismic hazard: a proposal for a multilayer hazard map (submitted to Boll Geof Teor Appl)Google Scholar
  12. Gunay MS, Mosalam KM (2010) Structural engineering reconnaissance of the 6 April 2009. Abruzzo, Italy, Earthquake, and Lessons Learned. PEER report 2010/105. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Housner GW (1952) Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes. Second technical report. August 1952, California Institute of Technology, PasedenaGoogle Scholar
  14. Iervolino I (2012) Probabilità e salti mortali: le insidie della validazione della analisi di pericolosità attraverso l’occorrenza di singoli terremoti. Progettazione Sismica 2:37–43Google Scholar
  15. Iervolino I, De Luca F, Chioccarelli E, Dolce M (2010) L’azione sismica registrata durante il mainshock del 6 aprile 2009 a L’Aquila e le prescrizioni del DM14/01/2008 V.1. Web report. http://www.reluis.it (in Italian)
  16. Kottke AR, Rathje EM (2008) Technical manual for strata. PEER report 2008/10. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, February p 84Google Scholar
  17. Liberatore L, Sorrentino L, Liberatore D, Decanini LD (2013) Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes. Eng Fail Anal. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.009
  18. Luzi L, Puglia R, Pacor F, Gallipoli MR, Bindi D, Mucciarelli M (2011) Proposal for a soil classification based on parameters alternative or complementary to Vs, 30. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1877–1898. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9274-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malagnini L, Herrmann RB, Munafò I, Buttinelli M, Anselmi M, Akinci A, Boschi E (2012) The 2012 Ferrara seismic sequence: regional crustal structure, earthquake sources, and seismic hazard. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19302. doi:10.1029/2012GL053214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martelli L, Calabrese L, Ercolessi G, et al (2013) Microzonazione sismica dell’area epicentrale del terremoto della pianura emiliana del 2012. XXXII Convegno GNGTS—Gruppo Nazionale di Geofisica della Terra Solida, 18–21 November 2013, Trieste, Italy (in Italian)Google Scholar
  21. Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Braga F, Mucciarelli M, Vona M, Ditommaso R (2011) Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila, 2009 ground motions: observed vs code provision values. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masi A, Vona M, Mucciarelli M (2011) Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on RC frames. J Struct Eng 137(3):367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masi A, Santarsiero G, Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Manfredi V, Dusi A, Stabile TA (2013) Performance of the health facilities during the 2012 Emilia earthquake and analysis of the Mirandola Hospital case study. Bull Earthq Eng (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9518-4
  24. Montaldo V, Meletti C, Martinelli F, Stucchi M, Locati M (2007) On-line seismic hazard data for the New Italian building code. J Earthq Eng 11(1):119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mucciarelli M, Pacor F, Vanini M, Bettinali F (1997) Definition of seismic input for base isolation applications: methodologies assessment, statistical analysis and tools developed. In: Proceedings of the Post-SMIRT conference on Seismic Isolation, SMIRT, Taormina, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  26. NTC08 (2008) DM 14 gennaio 2008—Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministero delle Infrastrutture. http://www.cslp.it (in Italian)
  27. Ohori M, Nobata A, Wakamatsu K (2002) A comparison of ESAC and FK methods of estimating phase velocity using arbitrarily shaped micritremor arrays. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2323–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okada H (2003) The microtremor survey method. Geophysical Monograph Series, SEG, 2003, p 129Google Scholar
  29. Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri no. 3519/2006 (2006) Criteri generali per l’individuazione delle zone sismiche e per la formazione e l’aggiornamento delle medesime zone. Gazzetta Ufficiale 11 maggio 2006, No 108 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  30. Parolai S, Richwalski SM, Milkereit C, Faeh D (2006) S-wave velocity profile for earthquake engineering purposes for the Cologne area (Germany). Bull Earthq Eng 4:65–94. doi:10.1007/s10518-005-5758-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pitilakis K, Riga E, Anastasiadis A (2013) New code site classification, amplification factors and normalized response spectra based on a worldwide ground-motion database. Bull Earthq Eng 11:925–966. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9429-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Priolo E, Romanelli M, Barnaba C, Mucciarelli M, Laurenzano G, Dall’Olio L, Abu Zeid N, Caputo R, Santarato G, Vignola L, Lizza C, Di Bartolomeo P (2012) The Ferrara thrust earthquakes of May-June 2012: preliminary site response analysis at the sites of the OGS temporary network. Ann Geophys 55(4):591–597. doi:10.4401/ag-6172 Google Scholar
  33. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2):337–352Google Scholar
  34. SESAME Project (2004) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations. Measurements, processing and interpretation, WP12, deliverable No. D23.12, 2004. http://sesame-fp5.obs.ujf-renoble.fr/Papers/HV_User_Guidelines.pdf
  35. Sorrentino L, Liberatore L, Liberatore D, Masiani R (2013) The behaviour of vernacular buildings in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9455-2
  36. Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V, Crowley H, Calvi GM, Boschi E (2011) Seismic hazard assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian building code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1885–1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Rosaria Gallipoli
    • 1
  • Leonardo Chiauzzi
    • 2
  • Tony Alfredo Stabile
    • 1
  • Marco Mucciarelli
    • 2
    • 3
  • Angelo Masi
    • 2
  • Carmine Lizza
    • 4
  • Luigi Vignola
    • 4
  1. 1.National Research Council - IMAATitoItaly
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of BasilicataPotenzaItaly
  3. 3.CRS-OGSNational Institute of Oceanography and ExperimentalTriesteItaly
  4. 4.Mallet s.r.lMarsicovetereItaly

Personalised recommendations