Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theory of plastic mechanism control for MRF–CBF dual systems and its validation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the theory of plastic mechanism control is presented for moment resisting frame–concentrically braced frames dual systems, i.e. for structural systems combined by moment resisting frames and concentrically braced frames. It is aimed at the design of structures failing in global mode, i.e. whose collapse mechanism is characterised by the yielding of all the tensile diagonals and the occurrence of buckling in the compressed ones, and by plastic hinge formation at all the beam ends and at the base of first storey columns. The proposed methodology is based on the application of the kinematic theorem of plastic collapse, by imposing that the global mechanism equilibrium curve has to lie below all the other equilibrium curves corresponding to undesired mechanisms. The practical application of the design methodology is illustrated by means of a worked example. In addition, the results of a non-linear static pushover and dynamic analyses of the designed structure are also discussed in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CEN (2003) PrEN 1998-1. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

  • CEN (2005) EN 1993-1-1—Eurocode 3: design of steel structures. Part 1: general rules and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, 2005

  • Conti MA, Mastrandrea L, Piluso V (2009) Plastic design and seismic response of knee braced frames. Adv Steel Constr 5(3):343–366

    Google Scholar 

  • CSI (1998) SAP 2000: Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures. Analysis Reference, Computers and Structures Inc., University of California, Berkeley

  • D’Aniello M, La Manna Ambrosino G, Portioli F, Landolfo R (2013) Modelling aspects of the seismic response of steel concentric braced frames. Steel Compos Struct Int J 5:539–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aniello M, Landolfo R, Piluso V, Rizzano G (2012) Ultimate behavior of steel beams under uniform bending. J Constr Steel Res 78:144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicleli M, Calik EE (2008) Physical theory hysteretic model for steel braces. ASCE 0733-9445 134:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell BV, Myers AT, Deierlein GG, Kanvinde AM (2006) Testing and simulation in steel braces. Paper presented at the conference 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco

  • Georgescu D, Toma C, Gosa O (1991) Post-critical behaviour of ‘K’ braced frames. J Constr Steel Res 21:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giugliano MT, Longo A, Mastrandrea L, Montuori R, Piluso V (2009) Plastic design of MRF-CBF systems. In: ICASS ’09 sixth international conference on advances in steel structures, Hong Kong, China16, 17, 18 December 2009

  • Giugliano MT, Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2010) Failure mode and drift control of MRF-CBF dual systems. Open Constr Build Technol J 4:121–133. doi:10.2174/1874836801004010121

    Google Scholar 

  • Giugliano MT, Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2011) Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:1455–1474. doi:10.1002/eqe.1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güneyisi EM, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R, Mermerdaş K (2013) A novel formulation of the flexural overstrength factor of steel beams. J Constr Steel Res 90:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda K, Mahin SA (1984) A refined physical theory model for predicting the seismic behaviour of braced frames. Report UMEE 77R3, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Michigan

  • Italian Seismic code. D.M. 14 gennaio 2008: Norme tecniche sulle costruzioni e Circolare esplicativa n. 617 del 02 febbraio 2009

  • Jain AK, Goel SC, Hanson RD (1978) Hysteresis behaviour of bracing members and seismic response of braced frames with different proportions. Report UMEE 78R3, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Michigan

  • Jalayer F, Cornell CA (2003) A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD). Seismic Formats, PEER, Report 2003/06

  • Lee K, Bruneau M (2002) Review of energy dissipation compression members in concentrically braced frames. Report MCEER-02-0005, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Buffalo, New York

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2008a) Failure mode control of X-braced frames under seismic actions. J Earthq Eng 12:728–759. doi:10.1080/13632460701457231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2008b) Plastic design of seismic resistant V-Braced frames. J Earthq Eng 12:1246–1266. doi:10.1080/13632460802211867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2008c) Influence of design criteria on the seismic reliability of X-braced frames. J Earthq Eng 12:406–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo A, Mastrandrea L, Piluso V, (2008d) Design approach for failure mode control of MRF-CBF dual systems. EUROSTEEL 2008, 3–5 September, Graz, Austria

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2012a) Theory of plastic mechanism control of dissipative truss moment frames. Eng Struct 37(2012):63–75. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2012b) Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames. J Struct Eng 138(11):1388–1397. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000569 ( ASCE, ISSN 0733–9445/2012/11)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V (2009) Seismic reliability of V-braced frames: influence of design methodologies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:1587–1608. doi:10.1002/eqe.919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastrandrea L, Montuori R, Piluso V (2003a) Failure mode control of seismic resistant EB-frames. In: Stessa 2003, 4th international conference on behavior of steel structures in seismic areas, Naples, 9–12 October 2003. Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Mastrandrea L, Montuori R, Piluso V (2008) (b) “Shear-moment interaction in plastic design: eccentrically braced frames” Stessa 2003, 4th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures Naples, 9–12 October 2003. Rotterdam: Balkema

  • Mazzolani FM, Piluso V (1996) Theory and design of seismic resistant steel frames. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzolani FM, Piluso V (1997) Plastic design of seismic resistant steel frames. Earthq Eng Structl Dyn 26:167–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori R, Nastri E, Piluso V (2014a) Theory of plastic mechanism control for eccentrically braced frames with inverted Y-scheme. J Constr Steel Res 92:122–135. doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori R, Nastri E, Piluso V (2014b) Rigid-plastic analysis and moment-shear interaction for hierarchy criteria of inverted Y EB-Frames. J Constr Steel Res 95:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori R, Nastri E, Piluso V (2014c) Theory of plastic mechanism control for the seismic design of braced frames equipped with friction dampers. Mech Res Commun. doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.10.020

  • Montuori R, Piluso V (2000) Plastic design of steel frames with dog-bone beam-to-column joints. In: Third international conference on behaviour of steel structures in seismic areas, STESSA 2000, Montreal, 21–24 August, 2000

  • Sabelli R, Mahin S, Chang C (2003) Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings 580 with buckling-restrained braces. Eng Struct 25(5):655–666.58 (665–701)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (1999) Tentative lateral force requirement. Seismol Comm Struct

  • SEAOC (1995) Vision 2000—a framework for performance based design, vol I-III, seismology committee, structural engineers association of California, Sacramento, San Francisco, Los Angeles, California

  • Tremblay R (2002) Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members. J Constr Steel Res 58:665–701. doi:10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00104-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Goel SC (1989) Brace fractures and analysis of phase I structure. J Struct Eng 102:1960–1976. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriz P, Filippou FC, Mahin SA (2008) Modelling for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces. J Struct Eng 134(4):619–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering of Salerno, Salerno, Italy

    A. Longo, R. Montuori & V. Piluso

Authors
  1. A. Longo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Montuori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Piluso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Longo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Longo, A., Montuori, R. & Piluso, V. Theory of plastic mechanism control for MRF–CBF dual systems and its validation. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 2745–2775 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9612-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9612-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation