Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At present, the seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is made considering fixed base conditions; moreover, the mechanical properties of the building remain intact in time. In this study we investigate whether these two fundamental hypotheses are sound as aging and soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects might play a crucial role in the seismic fragility analysis of RC structures. Among the various aging processes, we consider the chloride-induced corrosion based on probabilistic modeling of corrosion initiation time and corrosion rate. Different corrosion aspects are considered in the analysis including the loss of reinforcement cross-sectional area, the degradation of concrete cover and the reduction of steel ultimate deformation. SSI is modeled by applying the direct one-step approach, which accounts simultaneously for inertial and kinematic interactions. Two-dimensional incremental dynamic analysis is performed to assess the seismic performance of the initial uncorroded (\(\hbox {t}=0\) years) and corroded (\(\hbox {t}=50\) years) RC moment resisting frame structures, having been designed with different seismic code levels. The time-dependent fragility functions are derived in terms of the spectral acceleration at the fundamental mode of the structure \(\hbox {S}_{\mathrm{a}}(\hbox {T}_{1}\), 5 %) and the outcropping peak ground acceleration for the immediate occupancy and collapse prevention limit states. Results show an overall increase in seismic vulnerability over time due to corrosion highlighting the important influence of deterioration due to aging effects on the structural behavior. Moreover, the consideration of SSI and site effects may significantly alter the expected structural performance leading to higher vulnerability values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW, Cornell CA (2005) A vector valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1193–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berto L, Vitaliani R, Saetta A, Simioni P (2009) Seismic assessment of existing RC structures affected by degradation phenomena. Struct Saf 31:284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracci JM, Reinhorn AM, Mander JB (1992), Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: Part I—design and properties of a one-third scale model structure. Technical Report NCEER-92-0027

  • CEB-FIB Task Group 5.6 (2006) Model for service life design, fédération internationale du béton (fib)

  • Celarec D, Vamavatsikos D, Dolšek M (2011) Simplified estimation of seismic risk for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of corrosion over time. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1137–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney A (2008) Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures. J Struct Eng 134(4):581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2008) Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(3):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2009) Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct Saf 31:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D (2010) Fragility increment functions for deteriorating reinforced concrete bridge columns. Eng Mech 136(8):969–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampoli M, Pinto P (1995) Effects of soil-structure interaction on inelastic seismic response of bridge piers. Struct Eng 121(5):806–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Douglas AF (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 128(4):526–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coronelli D, Gambarova P (2004) Structural assessment of corroded reinforced concrete beams: modeling guidelines. J Struct Eng 130(8):1214–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Pinho R, Bommer JJ (2004) A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 2(2):173–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Colombi M, Silva M, Ahmad N, Fardis M, Tsionis G, Papailia A, Taucer F, Hancilar U, Yakut F, Erberik MA (2011) D3.1—fragility functions for common RC building types in Europe, WP3: fragility functions of elements at risk, seventh framework program (FP7): SYNER-G: systemic seismic vulnerability and risk analysis for buildings, lifeline networks and infrastructures safety gain

  • D’Ayala DF, Kappos A, Crowley H, Antoniadis P, Colombi M, Kishali E, Panagopoulos E, Silva V (2012) Providing building vulnerability data and analytical fragility functions for PAGER, final technical report EERI

  • DuraCrete (1998) Modeling of degradation, BRITE-EURAM-Project BE95-1347/R4-5

  • DuraCrete (2000) Probabilistic performance based on durability design of concrete structures: statistical quantification of the variables in the limit state functions, Report No.: BE 95-1347, 62-63

  • Dutta SC, Bhattacharya K, Roy R (2004) Response of low-rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(12):893–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EAK2000 (2000) Greek seismic code, organization of seismic planning and protection

  • Fotopoulou S, Karapetrou S, Pitilakis K, Gehl P, Douglas J, Réveillère A (2012a) D5.3: inventory of mechanisms acting on performances of structures during lifetime, WP 5: real time-dependent risk assessment, seventh framework program (FP7): REAKT—strategies and tools for real time earthquake risk reduction

  • Fotopoulou SD, Karapetrou ST, Pitilakis KD (2012b) Seismic vulnerability of RC buildings considering SSI and aging effects. In: Proceedings of the 15WCEE international conference, Lisboa

  • Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2010) Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J Struct Eng 136(12):1497–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8:339–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Chen ATF (1975) Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1315–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos AJ, Panagiotopoulos C, Panagopoulos G, Panagopoulos El (2003) WP4-reinforced concrete buildings (Level I and II analysis), RISK-UE: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns

  • Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:391–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsan I, Jirsa J (1969) Behavior of concrete under compressive loadings. ASCE J Struct Div 95:2543–2563

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent DC, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 97(ST7):1969–1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok AOL, Stewart JP, Hashash YM, Matasovic N, Pyke R, Wang Z, Yang Z (2007) Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear seismic ground response analysis procedures. J Geotech Eng 133(11):1385–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon O-S, Elnashai A (2007) Probabilistic seismic assessment of structure, foundation and soil interacting systems. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, NSEL Report Series, Report No. NSEL-004

  • Lysmer J (1978) Analytical procedures in soil dynamics. University of California at Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, Report No. UCB/EERC-78/29, CA

  • Lysmer J, Kuhlemeyer RL (1969) Finite dynamic model for infinite media. Eng Mech 95:859–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Malioka V (2009) Condition indicators for the assessment of local and spatial deterioration of concrete structures Swiss federal institute of technology. PhD thesis, Zurich

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2009) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AM, Almansour HH, Martín-Pérez B (2011) Combined effect of reinforcement corrosion and seismic loads on RC bridge columns: modeling. In: 2nd International engineering mechanics and materials specialty conference June 14–17, 2011, Ottawa, ON, pp 1–10

  • National Institute of Building Sciences (2004) Direct physical damage—general building stock, HAZUS-MH Technical manual, Chapter 5. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Neuenhofer A, Filippou FC (1997) Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models. J Struct Eng 123(7):958–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev P, Tesfamariam S (2012) Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 40:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J, Ortega LM, Casal J (1997) Load carrying capacity of concrete structures with corroded reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 11(4):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriquez J, Andrade C (2001) CONTECVET—a validated user’s manual for assessing the residual service life of concrete structures. GEOCISA, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2005) A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 27(3):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saetta A, Simioni P, Berto L, Vitaliani R (2008) Seismic response of corroded r.c. structures. In: International fib symposium, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  • Saez E, Lopez-Caballero F, Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi A (2011) Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil-structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment. Struct Saf 33:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saydam D, Frangopol DM (2011) Time-dependent performance indicators of damaged bridge superstructures. Eng Struct 33:2458–2471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shome N, Cornell CA (1999) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. RMS Report-35, Reliability of Marine Structures Group, Stanford University, Stanford

  • Simioni P (2009) Seismic response of reinforced concrete structures affected by reinforcement corrosion. PhD thesis. Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences University of Braunschweig—Institute of Technology and the Faculty of Engineering University of Florence

  • Simon J, Bracci JM, Gardoni P (2010) Seismic response and fragility of deteriorated reinforced concrete bridges. Struct Eng 136(10):1273–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer FF (1996) Fibre beam-column element for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames. Part I Formul Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart M (2004) Spatial variability of pitting corrosion and its influence on structural fragility and reliability of RC beams in flexure. Struct Saf 26:453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Fenves GL, Seed RB (1999) Seismic soil-structure-interaction in buildings I: analytical aspects. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(1):26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsionis G, Papailia A, Fardis MN (2011) Analytical fragility functions for reinforced concrete buildings and buildings aggregates of Euro-Mediterranean regions—UPAT methodology. Internal Report, Syner-G Project 2009/2012

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2004) Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Spectra 20(2):523–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2005a) Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of MDOF systems through incremental dynamic analysis of an SDOF approximation. ASCE J Struct Eng 131(4):589–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2005b) Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1573–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Meek JW (1974) Dynamic behavior of building foundation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3(2):121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalciner H, Sensoy S, Eren O (2012) Time-dependent seismic performance assessment of a single-degree-of-freedom frame subject to corrosion. Eng Fail Anal 19:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was carried out in the framework of the ongoing REAKT (http://www.reaktproject.eu/) project, funded by the European Commission, FP7-282862.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Research Unit of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Aristotle University, Thessaloníki, Greece

    K. D. Pitilakis, S. T. Karapetrou & S. D. Fotopoulou

Authors
  1. K. D. Pitilakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. T. Karapetrou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. D. Fotopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. T. Karapetrou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitilakis, K.D., Karapetrou, S.T. & Fotopoulou, S.D. Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 1755–1776 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9575-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9575-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation