Abstract
All current empirical approaches for pile design in liquefied soils agree that the ultimate soil pressure on the pile is drastically reduced relative to the reference ultimate pressures, in the absence of liquefaction. However, there is disagreement with regard to the extent of the aforementioned reduction and also controversy about the pile and soil parameters which control it. For instance, well documented experimental data from centrifuge tests show that significant negative excess pore pressures may develop due to the dilation of the liquefied soil that flows around the upper part of the pile, thus enhancing ultimate soil pressures well above the recommended values. In view of the above objective uncertainties, the problem was analyzed numerically using a 3D dynamic procedure. Namely, FLAC 3D was combined with the NTUA Sand constitutive model, for dynamic loading and liquefaction of cohesionless soils, and was consequently used to perform parametric analyses for various pile, soil and seismic excitation characteristics. To ensure the validity of the predictions, the numerical methodology was first verified against the afore mentioned centrifuge experiments. It is thus concluded that dilation-induced negative excess pore pressures are indeed possible for common pile and soil conditions encountered in practice. As a result, apart from the relative density of the sand, a common parameter in most empirical relations, a number of other dilation related factors influence also the ultimate soil pressure, such as: the effective confining stress, the permeability of the sand and the predominant excitation period, as well as the pile diameter and deflection. Furthermore, it is shown that dilation effects are more pronounced at the upper and middle segments of the pile, having an overall detrimental effect on pile response. Finally, a preliminary evaluation of numerical results shows that the development of a new methodology for the evaluation of p–y response in laterally spreading soils which would incorporate the above effects is feasible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar YB, El-Tahir E-TA (1986) Low strain dynamic properties of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1001–1015
Andrianopoulos KI, Papadimitriou AG, Bouckovalas GD (2010) Bounding surface plasticity model for the seismic liquefaction analysis of geostructures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(10):895–911
Arulmoli K, Muraleetharan KK, Hossain MM, Fruth LS (1992) VELACS: verification of liquefaction analyses by centrifuge studies; Laboratory Testing Program—Soil Data Report. Research Report, The Earth. Technology Corporation
Brandenberg SJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL, Chang D (2007) Static pushover analyses of pile groups in liquefied and laterally spreading ground in centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(9):1055–1066
Chaloulos YK (2012) Numerical investigation of pile response under liquefaction and ground lateral spreading. PhD Thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering, NTUA, Athens
Chaloulos YK, Bouckovalas GD, Karamitros DK (2013) Pile response in submerged lateral spreads: common pitfalls of numerical and physical modeling techniques. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 55:275–287
Chaloulos YK, Bouckovalas GD, Karamitros DK (2014) Analysis of liquefaction effects on ultimate pile reaction to lateral spreading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCF)GT.1943-5606.0001047
Cubrinovski M, Ishihara K (2007) Simplified analysis of piles subjected to lateral spreading: parameters and uncertainties. In: Pittilakis K (ed) 4th International conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece
Elgamal A, Lu J, Yang Z (2005) Liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations and remediation: 3D numerical simulation. J Earthq Eng. 9(SPEC. ISS.):17–45
Ghosh B, Madabhushi SPG (2003) A numerical investigation into effects of single and multiple frequency earthquake motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(8):691–704
González L, Abdoun T, Dobry R (2009) Effect of soil permeability on centrifuge modeling of pile response to lateral spreading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(1):62–73
Karamitros DK (2010) Development of a numerical algorithm for the dynamic elastoplastic analysis of geotechnical structures in two and three dimensions. PhD Thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering, NTUA, Athens
Liu L, Dobry R (1997) Seismic response of shallow foundation on liquefiable sand. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(6):557–566
Papadimitriou AG, Bouckovalas GD (2002) Plasticity model for sand under small and large cyclic strains: a multiaxial formulation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(3):191–204
Popescu R, Prevost JH, Deodatis G, Chakrabortty P (2006) Dynamics of nonlinear porous media with applications to soil liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(6–7):648–665
Saxena SK, Avramidis AS, Reddy KR (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cemented sands at low strains. Can Geotech J 25(2):353–368
Schnaid F, Prietto PDM, Consoli NC (2001) Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):857–868
Sharma SS, Fahey M (2003) Degradation of stiffness of cemented calcareous soil in cyclic triaxial tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(7):619–629
Tokimatsu K, Seed HB (1987) Evaluation of settlement in sands due to earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng 113(8):861–878
Tokimatsu K, Suzuki H (2009) Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction based on large shaking table tests. In: Kokusho T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshimine M (eds) Performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Taylor & Francis, London
Vesic AS (1972) Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 98(SM3):265–290
Acknowledgments
In support of our research, Itasca Inc. has granted free use of FLAC3D (4.0) through Educational Loan S/N 242-001-0165. This contribution is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouckovalas, G., Chaloulos, Y. Kinematic interaction of piles in laterally spreading ground. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 1221–1237 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9553-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9553-1